PO.ET03.01 · 实验与分子治疗

靶点上的WRN突变驱动TA重复扩增的MSI癌症对WRN抑制剂的耐药

On-target WRN mutations drive resistance to WRN inhibitors in TA-repeat-expanded MSI cancers

海报缩略图:靶点上的WRN突变驱动TA重复扩增的MSI癌症对WRN抑制剂的耐药
编号 374 展板 7 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 16 主讲 Gabriele Picco, PhD
分会场 Mechanisms of Drug Resistance 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Gabriele Picco1, Yanhua Rao2, Angham Al Saedi1, Samantha Walker1, Shriram Bhosle1, Yang Lee3, Maria Garcia-Casado1, Gilberto Valdes Garcia2, Kieron May4, Francesco Sassi5, James P. Phelan2, Philip Landis2, Brian Jones6, Diana Munoz6, Jay Prakash Jain6, Paul A. Barsanti6, Joshua P. Taygerly6, Michael P. DeMartino2, Emanuel Gonçalves7, Andrea Bertotti5, Livio Trusolino5, Michael A. White6, Geeta Sharma3, Matthew A. Coelho1, Jonathan Houseley4, Benjamin Schwartz3, Mathew J. Garnett1

1Wellcome Sanger Institute, Cambridge, United Kingdom,2GSK, Upper Providence, PA,3GSK, Cambridge, MA,4Babraham Institute, Cambridge, UK, United Kingdom,5Candiolo Cancer Institute, Candiolo, Torino, Italy, Italy,6IDEAYA Biosciences, South San Francisco, CA,7Instituto Superior Técnico (IST), Lisboa, United Kingdom

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
Werner解旋酶抑制剂(WRNi)正在针对具有DNA错配修复缺陷的微卫星不稳定(MSI)肿瘤进行临床开发。构成这一易感性基础的一个关键遗传特征是TA二核苷酸重复的扩增,它使细胞选择性地依赖于WRN功能。尽管存在这种明确的合成致死性,但在WRN基因缺失或抑制的选择压力下肿瘤细胞进化的途径仍然完全未知。在此,我们研究了癌细胞进化如何塑造对WRN抑制的反应并揭示耐药机制。全基因组CRISPR筛选结合完全的WRN敲除显示不存在旁路通路,强调了WRN在MSI细胞中不可或缺且不可冗余的功能。药物基因组学分析鉴定出WRNi敏感性的调节因子,包括MRN复合物、ATM和SMARCAL1,但没有一个能够挽救细胞活力,证实了WRN-MSI合成致死相互作用的稳健性。WRN-MSI合成致死性在多种模型中保持稳健,包括患者来源类器官和免疫治疗难治性肿瘤。利用半饱和诱变、跨越多种组织谱系细胞系的长期药物暴露以及体内验证,我们鉴定出一系列驱动对多种WRNi获得性耐药的复发性靶点上WRN突变。在经HRO761治疗的细胞系来源和患者来源异种移植瘤中获得性WRN突变的体内证据支持了这一点,为该耐药机制提供了直接的临床前验证。通过短读长测序推断并经长读长测序测定的TA重复在WRNi治疗下保持稳定,且与耐药无关联。耐药克隆未显示MMR恢复或其他旁路机制的证据。某些WRN突变赋予广泛的交叉耐药,而另一些则保留了对替代WRNi的敏感性;例如,I852F保留了对VVD-133214的敏感性但对HRO761无敏感性,而F730L对两者均赋予泛耐药却仍对GSK4418959易感。这三种化合物均为临床进展中的WRN抑制剂,目前正在推进I期试验。在体外获得对HRO761继发性耐药的患者来源类器官中也验证了部分差异性敏感和耐药模式。最后,耐药克隆对合理策略仍然易感:将WRNi与irinotecan联合可抑制耐药性生长,而ATR抑制剂和正交WRNi则提供了延长反应的额外途径。这些发现确立了靶点上WRN突变作为WRN抑制剂耐药的主导机制,并为基于耐药信息的临床试验设计定义了框架。它们还勾勒出检测和克服耐药的可行策略,包括基于ctDNA的分子监测和合理的联合治疗以延长临床获益。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Werner helicase inhibitors (WRNi) are in clinical development for microsatellite-unstable (MSI) tumours with defective DNA mismatch repair. A key genetic feature underlying this vulnerability is the expansion of TA dinucleotide repeats, which renders cells selectively reliant on WRN function. Despite this clear synthetic lethality, routes of tumour cell evolution under the selective pressure of WRN genetic loss or inhibition remain entirely unknown. Here, we investigate how cancer cell evolution shapes response to WRN inhibition and informs resistance mechanisms. Genome-wide CRISPR screens combined with complete WRN knockout revealed no bypass pathways, underscoring WRN's essential and non-redundant function in MSI cells. Pharmacogenomic profiling identified modulators of WRNi sensitivity, including the MRN complex, ATM, and SMARCAL1, but none rescued viability, confirming the robustness of the WRN-MSI synthetic-lethal interaction. WRN-MSI synthetic lethality remains robust across diverse models, including patient-derived organoids and immunotherapy-refractory tumours. Using semi-saturation mutagenesis, prolonged drug exposure across cell lines from diverse tissue lineages, and in vivo validation, we identified a spectrum of recurrent on-target WRN mutations driving acquired resistance to multiple WRNi. This was supported by in vivo evidence of acquired WRN mutations in both cell line-derived and patient-derived xenografts treated with HRO761, providing direct preclinical validation of this resistance mechanism. TA repeats, inferred by short-read sequencing and measured by long-read sequencing, remained stable under WRNi treatment and were unlinked to resistance. Resistant clones showed no evidence of MMR restoration or other bypass mechanisms. Some WRN mutations conferred broad cross-resistance, whereas others preserved sensitivity to alternative WRNi; for example, I852F retained sensitivity to VVD-133214 but not to HRO761, whereas F730L conferred pan-resistance to both yet remained vulnerable to GSK4418959. All three compounds are clinically advanced WRN inhibitors currently progressing through Phase I trials. Some differential sensitivity and resistance patterns were also validated in patient-derived organoids that acquired secondary resistance to HRO761 in vitro. Finally, resistant clones remained vulnerable to rational strategies: combining WRNi with irinotecan suppressed resistant outgrowth, while ATR inhibitors and orthogonal WRNi offer additional routes to extend response. These findings establish on-target WRN mutation as the dominant mechanism of resistance to WRN inhibitors and define a framework for resistance-informed clinical trial design. They also outline actionable strategies to detect and overcome resistance, including ctDNA-based molecular monitoring and rational combination therapies to extend clinical benefit.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. Picco, GSK ). Y. Rao, GSK Employment. A. Al Saedi, None.. S. Walker, None.. S. Bhosle, None.. M. Garcia-Casado, None. G. Valdes Garcia, GSK Employment. K. May, None.. F. Sassi, None. J. P. Phelan, GSK Employment. P. Landis, GSK Employment. B. Jones, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. D. Munoz, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. J. Prakash Jain, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. P. A. Barsanti, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. J. P. Taygerly, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. M. P. DeMartino, GSK Employment. E. Gonçalves, None.. A. Bertotti, None.. L. Trusolino, None. M. A. White, IDEAYA Biosciences Employment. G. Sharma, GSK Employment. M. A. Coelho, None.. J. Houseley, None. B. Schwartz, GSK Employment. M. J. Garnett, GSK ).

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索