PO.PS01.12 · 人群科学

诊断前绿地暴露与卵巢癌确诊女性的生存

Pre-diagnosis green space exposure and survival in women diagnosed with ovarian cancer

海报缩略图:诊断前绿地暴露与卵巢癌确诊女性的生存
编号 6254 展板 16 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 33 主讲 Charlotte (Charlie) Roscoe, PhD
分会场 Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors, Infection, and Aging
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Jaileene Pérez-Morales1, Hari S. Iyer2, Jaime E. Hart3, Francine Laden4, Laura D. Kubzansky5, Joshua M. Moreau1, Guillermo Armaiz-Pena6, Shelley Tworoger1, Charlotte Roscoe1

1Division of Oncological Sciences, OHSU Knight Cancer Institute, Portland, OR,2Rutgers Cancer Institute of New Jersey, New Brunswick, NJ,3Channing Division of Network Medicine, Department of Medicine, Brigham and Women's Hospital and Harvard Medical School, Boston, MA,4Department of Environmental Health, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA,5Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA,6Cancer Biology and Women’s Health Divisions, Ponce Health Sciences University School of Medicine, Ponce, PR

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:尽管治疗手段不断进步,浸润性卵巢癌患者的五年相对生存率仍为50%。越来越多的文献表明,痛苦、抑郁和其他社会心理压力源对生存产生负面影响。绿地暴露——如公园、花园、森林和街道树木——已被证实与较低的应激激素水平和较低的抑郁风险相关。因此,我们的目的是评估在Nurses' Health Study(NHS)和NHSII队列的病例中,诊断前的绿化暴露是否与卵巢癌生存改善相关。 方法:采用归一化植被指数(NDVI;30m²分辨率)——一种卫星衍生的光合植被覆盖指标——按季节评估NHS和NHSII队列参与者居住地址周围邻近(270m)和步行可达(1230m)距离缓冲区内的绿化暴露(1988年至2018年每两年更新一次)。我们采用时变Cox比例风险模型评估已确诊病例的累积诊断前最大平均NDVI暴露与卵巢癌特异性生存之间的关系。模型校正了年龄和日历时间、美国地区、人口密度以及与卵巢癌生存相关的诊断前因素,包括绝经状态、乳腺癌或卵巢癌家族史和产次。额外校正了时变抑郁——自报的抗抑郁药使用或临床诊断的抑郁——以评估绿地暴露与生存之间关系的潜在中介作用。 结果:分析纳入了1,052名确诊卵巢癌的女性。在校正除抑郁外的所有因素时,我们观察到累积诊断前270m NDVI暴露每增加0.1个单位(10%),卵巢癌死亡风险有提示性下降(校正HR 0.92;95% CI 0.79,1.07)。加入抑郁后,反向关联略有增强(校正HR 0.90,95% CI 0.76,1.07),但未达到统计学显著性。未观察到累积诊断前1230m NDVI暴露的关联。 结论:诊断前居所附近的绿化暴露与卵巢癌病例的生存改善呈提示性关联。校正抑郁状态后反向关联略有增强,表明绿化与生存的关联不太可能完全由抑郁状态解释;应探索其他潜在的机制途径(如污染和温度降低、睡眠质量改善、身体活动、维生素D水平和免疫功能)。正在进行的分析将按组织学亚型评估关联。未来研究需要评估自然暴露(包括但不限于绿地)的类型和质量与患者风险和生存的关系,并按地理和生态区域进行分层。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Despite treatment advances, the five-year relative survival is 50% for patients with invasive ovarian cancer. Increasing literature demonstrates that distress, depression, and other psychosocial stressors negatively influence survival. Exposure to green spaces - e.g., parks, gardens, forests and street trees - has been associated with lower stress hormone levels and reduced risk of depression. Thus, our objective was to evaluate if greenness exposure, pre-diagnosis, was associated with improved ovarian cancer survival among cases in the Nurses' Health Study (NHS) and NHSII cohorts. Methods: Greenness exposure was assessed seasonally within nearby (270m) and walkable (1230m) distance buffers surrounding NHS and NHSII cohort participants' residential addresses (updated biennially from 1988 to 2018) using the Normalized Difference Vegetation Index (NDVI; 30m 2 resolution)-a satellite-derived indicator of photosynthetic vegetation cover. We used time-varying Cox proportional hazards models to assess cumulative, pre-diagnosis, maximum average NDVI exposure and ovarian cancer specific survival among confirmed cases. Models were adjusted for age and calendar time, US region, population density, and pre-diagnosis factors associated with ovarian cancer survival, including menopause status, family history of breast or ovarian cancer, and parity. Time-varying depression - self-reported antidepressant use or clinician diagnosed depression - was additionally adjusted to evaluate potential mediation of the relationship between greenspace exposure and survival. Results: Analyses included 1,052 women with confirmed ovarian cancer. We observed a suggestive decrease in ovarian cancer mortality risk for a 0.1 unit (10%) increase in cumulative pre-diagnosis 270m NDVI exposure (aHR 0.92; 95% CI 0.79, 1.07) when adjusting for all factors except depression. Adding depression led to a slightly stronger inverse association (aHR 0.90 95% CI 0.76, 1.07), although it did not reach statistical significance. No association was observed for cumulative pre-diagnosis 1230m NDVI exposure. Conclusions: Pre-diagnosis near-residence greenness exposure was suggestively associated with improved survival among ovarian cancer cases. Adjusting for depression status slightly strengthened the inverse association, indicating that the association of greenness with survival is unlikely to be fully explained by depression status; other potential mechanistic pathways (e.g., pollution and temperature reduction, improved sleep quality, physical activity, vitamin D levels and immune function) should be explored. On-going analyses will assess associations by histologic subtype. Future studies are needed to assess the type and quality of nature exposure, including but not limited to green spaces, with risk and survival among patients, with stratification by geographic and ecological regions.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Pérez-Morales, None.. H. S. Iyer, None.. J. E. Hart, None.. F. Laden, None.. L. D. Kubzansky, None.. J. M. Moreau, None.. G. Armaiz-Pena, None.. S. Tworoger, None.. C. Roscoe, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索