PO.PS01.12 · 人群科学

Functional Class I, Class II, and nonclassical HLA variation drives lymphoma and myeloma risk in the all of us research program

编号 6266 展板 28 时间 4/21 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 33 主讲 Lara Sucheston-Campbell, MS;PhD
分会场 Environmental and Occupational Risk Factors, Infection, and Aging
该海报暂无可访问的完整资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Lara Sucheston-Campbell1, Saanika Tambe1, Lian Zuo1, Alyssa Clay-Gilmour2, Vijai Joseph3, Benjamin Tycko4, Wendy Cozen5

1Wayne State University, Barbara Ann Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI,2Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC,3Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York City, NY,4Hackensack Meridian School of Medicine, Nutley, NJ,5UCI School of Medicine, Irvine, CA

摘要 Abstract

Background: HLA-mediated immune surveillance involves classical, non-classical, and class I-like pathways. Because lymphoma and myeloma rely on different immune mechanisms, we evaluated HLA class I/II, non-classical, and class I-like loci across ancestries using allele-level amino acids(AA), heterozygosity (HET), evolutionary divergence (HED), IEDB-derived peptide-binding breadth (PBW; 9-mer binding entropy), and positional amino-acid heterozygosity (residue mismatch). Methods: Hodgkin lymphoma (HL), NHL and subtypes, and multiple myeloma (MM) in All of Us Cohort were identified using ICD/SNOMED; controls lacked hematologic malignancy. HIBAG-imputed allele with n>20 cases were analyzed in EUR, AFR, and AMR. Models adjusted for age, sex, PCs, and admixture proportions tested ORs, 95% CIs, and FDR<0.1. We used joint PRS-HLA models to test whether HLA metrics contributed risk information beyond the lymphoma PRS. Results: We replicated EUR HET and/or HED class I/II associations with NHL (N=1668), DLBCL (N=490), HL (N=393), and FL (N=435), and extended these patterns using PBW and AA-level metrics. In NHL, we confirmed that HET-C reduced risk (p=0.027) and found greater PBW was protective (OR=0.49; p=0.09). Similarly, in CLL, we replicated the HET-A association (p=0.027), identified PBW-A effect (OR=0.25; p=.03), and a positional signal at A-163 (OR=.83, p=0.015) that also appeared in NHL(p=.015). Neither locus showed HED effects.Novel MM associations with HET-B and -C (OR≈0.74; p<0.03), were supported by a positional hit at B-42 (OR=0.77; P=0.033) and a PBW-C effect (OR≈0.24; p=0.01), while HED remained null. In contrast, DLBCL showed protection across all class I metrics as well as at MICB (OR=0.75; p=0.006) and MHC-like HET (OR=0.73; p=0.084). In EUR DLBCL, A*01:01 (OR=1.23; p=0.076) and A26:01 (OR=1.56; p=0.051) showed risk effects consistent with some prior reports reinforced by multiple A-locus positional signals (P<0.02).Novel AFR-specific findings included A*68:02 in: HL (OR=2.88; p=1.8×10⁻⁵), mirrored by a positional hit at A-30 (OR≈3.0, p=.0004), NHL at B*07:02 (OR=1.69; p=0.018) and for C1-motif alleles C07:01 (OR=1.51, p=.04) and C*07:02 (OR= 2.02, p=.00017) consistent with a KIR-C1 mechanism.The DLBCL PRS replicated (which includes an HLA-B variant) in EUR (OR=1.25, 95% CI 1.15-1.36; p=7.3×10⁻⁷) and joint models showed HED (p=0.0028) and HET (OR=0.86, 95% CI 0.80-0.93, p=7.0×10⁻ 5 ) remained significant when combined with PRS. AIC identified HET + PRS with covariates as the best model. The PRS did not replicate in AFR or AMR. Conclusion: We replicated classical HLA associations and identified novel non-classical and functional HLA features that shape B-cell malignancy risk across ancestries. Furthermore, adding orthogonal HLA metrics provided substantial, independent information beyond the PRS.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Sucheston-Campbell, None.. S. Tambe, None.. L. Zuo, None.. A. Clay-Gilmour, None.. V. Joseph, None.. B. Tycko, None.. W. Cozen, None.

在会议检索中打开