PO.SHP01.02 · 科学与健康政策
低收入和中等收入国家癌症临床试验中患者及患者团体的参与
Patient and patient group engagement in cancer clinical trials in low- and middle-income countries
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
我们在低收入和中等收入国家(LMIC)对癌症患者及患者团体开展了定性焦点小组讨论(FGD),以了解他们在癌症临床试验生态系统中的角色,并确定改善参与的策略。这些FGD是由National Cancer Institute牵头、旨在更好地刻画LMIC临床试验格局的更广泛的混合方法研究工作的一部分。来自六个WHO区域的参与者通过合作伙伴组织招募,这些组织分发了包含招募表单链接的电子邮件邀请,该表单收集人口统计学和临床试验经历信息。凡在LMIC中具有癌症亲身经历的个人均受邀参加。共开展了九场90分钟的半结构化FGD,来自25个国家的45名参与者参加。访谈经过录音、转录,并在Dedoose中使用定向内容分析法进行双人编码。大多数参与者报告其主要角色为癌症患者倡导者或癌症患者/幸存者(33/45)。大多数参与者表示,患者和患者团体并未系统性地参与临床试验,并指出对参与价值认识有限以及研究者被认为存在抵触是最大的挑战。LMIC中试验可及性有限和标准诊疗欠佳成为主要挑战。在参与的情况下,参与活动包括向患者宣教临床试验知识以及支持招募。参与者描述了理想的角色,包括充当患者与研究者之间的桥梁,研究者从设计到成果传播的各个环节都寻求患者的参与。参与者指出了若干促进患者参与度的因素,包括对临床流程的了解、获取特定临床试验信息的渠道、面向患者团体和研究者双方的能力建设,以及为参与建立正式流程和提供报酬。改善癌症诊疗质量和可及性成为许多人的重要优先事项。本研究从具有亲身经历者的视角,对LMIC癌症临床试验中患者及患者团体的参与情况进行了初步评估。研究结果揭示了当前与理想的患者及患者团体参与水平之间存在差距,其成因是认识有限、LMIC中的结构性障碍以及研究者被认为存在的抵触。加强认识、能力和结构化的参与机制,可能使患者团体能够充当社区与研究者之间的有效桥梁,并有助于在全球范围内改善以患者为中心的癌症诊疗。
查看英文原文 English abstract
We conducted qualitative focus group discussions (FGD) with cancer patients and patient groups in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) to understand their role in the cancer clinical trial ecosystem and identify strategies to improve engagement. These FGDs are part of a broader mixed-methods effort led by the National Cancer Institute to better characterize the clinical trial landscape in LMICs. Participants from six WHO regions were recruited through partner organizations, which disseminated email invitations including a link to a recruitment form collecting demographic and clinical trial experience information. Individuals in LMICs who have lived experience with cancer were invited to attend. Nine 90-minute semi-structured FGDs were conducted with 45 participants from 25 countries. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and double-coded in Dedoose using directed content analysis. Most participants reported their primary role as a cancer patient advocate or person with cancer or survivor (33/45). Most participants said that patients and patient groups are not systematically involved in clinical trials, citing limited awareness about value of engagement and perceived researcher resistance as the greatest challenges. Limited availability of trials in LMICs and poor standard of care emerged as major challenges. When involved, engagement activities included educating patients about clinical trials and supporting recruitment. Participants described an ideal role that included serving as a bridge between patients and researchers, with involvement sought by researchers from design through dissemination. Participants noted several facilitators to increase patient engagement, including knowledge about the clinical process, access to information about specific clinical trials, capacity building for both patient groups and researchers, and implementing a formal process and compensation for engagement. Improving cancer care quality and access emerged as an important priority for many. This study provides an initial assessment of patient and patient group involvement in cancer clinical trials in LMICs from the perspective of people with lived experience. Findings reveal a gap between current and ideal levels of patient and patient group engagement, driven by limited awareness, structural barriers in LMICs, and perceived researcher resistance. Strengthening awareness, capacity, and structured mechanisms for involvement may enable patient groups to serve as effective bridges between communities and researchers and help improve patient-centered cancer care globally.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Eldridge, None..
A. Galassi, None..
S. Gopal, None..
O. Ginsburg, None..
M. Cira, None.