PO.CL01.11 · 临床研究

高灵敏度cfDNA检测KRAS扩增亚型以指导靶向治疗反应和耐药机制

High-sensitivity cfDNA detection of KRAS amplification subtypes to inform targeted therapy response and resistance mechanisms

海报缩略图:高灵敏度cfDNA检测KRAS扩增亚型以指导靶向治疗反应和耐药机制
编号 7822 展板 3 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 45 主讲 Haoran Tang
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 5
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Yong Huang, Lisha Zhu, Binggang Xiang, Pan Du

Predicine, Inc., Hayward, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:KRAS是关键的致癌驱动基因,其突变和扩增均可作为重要的治疗靶点和耐药生物标志物。KRAS的点突变、野生型等位基因扩增或突变型等位基因扩增(有时通过突变型等位基因特异性失衡(MASI))均可能极大影响癌症治疗。在游离DNA(cfDNA)样本中检测KRAS扩增尤其具有挑战性,因为KRAS跨越12号染色体上一个高度可变区段内相对较小的45kb区域。在cfDNA中实现对KRAS扩增的灵敏、准确检测并区分扩增类型仍是肿瘤药物开发中的迫切需求。 方法:我们开发了一种专有算法,以增强对大基因组区域的肿瘤分数估算和CNV判定。使用200例血浆样本,我们建立了肿瘤分数、观察到的拷贝数和变异等位基因频率之间关系的新模型。该模型可对KRAS扩增事件进行更全面的研究,包括区分KRAS的局灶性扩增与大基因组片段水平扩增,以及在携带KRAS驱动突变的样本中区分野生型等位基因扩增与突变型等位基因扩增。改进后的模型还提高了在可分配扩增类型时对KRAS扩增判定的灵敏度。 结果:应用新模型可在大多数评估样本中准确确定KRAS扩增类型。在一个包含800例cfDNA样本、代表多种实体瘤的扩展队列中,使用改进模型后KRAS扩增阳性病例增加了10%。在超过80%的病例中可以解析扩增类型(野生型等位基因或突变型等位基因扩增;局灶性或大基因组水平)。在基线和治疗中样本中均观察到KRAS ctDNA动态变化。 结论:本研究对cfDNA样本中的KRAS扩增谱进行了深入分析,并引入了一种改进的KRAS拷贝数判定模型。该增强方法提高了检测灵敏度,并通过区分扩增亚型提供了更丰富的生物学洞察。这些进展加强了基于cfDNA的KRAS评估在治疗决策和药物开发中的临床实用性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: KRAS is a key oncogenic driver gene, and both mutations and amplifications serve as important therapeutic targets and resistance biomarkers. Point mutations, amplifications of the wildtype allele, or amplifications of the mutant allele (sometimes via mutant allele-specific imbalance (MASI)) in KRAS all may impact cancer therapy greatly. Detection of KRAS amplifications in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) samples is particularly challenging because KRAS spans a relatively small 45kb region within a highly variable segment on chromosome 12. Achieving sensitive and accurate detection of KRAS amplifications in cfDNA and distinguishing the amplification types remains a pressing need in tumor drug development. Methods: We developed a proprietary algorithm to enhance tumor fraction estimation and CNV calling of large genomic regions. Using 200 plasma samples , we developed a new model for the relationship among tumor fraction, observed copy number and variant allele frequencies. This model enables more comprehensive investigation of KRAS amplification events, including differentiation between focal amplification and large genomic fragment level amplification of KRAS , and between wild type allele amplification and mutant allele amplification in samples with KRAS driver mutations. The refined model also improves sensitivity of KRAS amplification calling when the amplification types can be assigned. Results: Application of the new model allowed accurate determination of KRAS amplification types in most of the evaluated samples. In an expanded cohort of 800 cfDNA samples representing diverse solid tumors, KRAS amplification positive cases increased by 10% with the use of the refined model. Amplification types (wild-type allele or mutant allele amplification; focal or large genomic level) could be resolved in more than 80% of the cases. KRAS ctDNA dynamics were observed in both baseline and on-treatment samples. Conclusions: This study provides an in-depth analysis of KRAS amplification profiles in cfDNA samples and introduces an improved model for KRAS copy number calling. The enhanced method increases detection sensitivity and yields richer biological insights by distinguishing amplification subtypes. These advancements strengthen the clinical utility of cfDNA-based KRAS assessment for therapeutic decision-making and drug development.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Huang, Predicine, Inc. Employment. L. Zhu, Predicine, Inc. Employment. B. Xiang, Predicine, Inc. Employment. P. Du, Predicine, Inc. Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索