PO.CL01.11 · 临床研究

仅基于血浆对CHIP、低VAF胚系变异和体细胞变异的分类可在无配对正常样本的情况下实现准确的肿瘤分数估算

Plasma-only classification of CHIP, low-VAF germline, and somatic variants enables accurate tumor-fraction estimation without matched normal samples

编号 7824 展板 5 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 45 主讲 Haoran Tang
分会场 Liquid Biopsies: Circulating Nucleic Acids 5
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tiantian Zheng, Yong Huang, Chao Dai, Junmei Wang, Xiaohong Wang, Pan Du

Predicine, Inc., Hayward, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:克隆性造血(CHIP)和胚系变异常出现在游离DNA(cfDNA)中并混淆肿瘤基因分型。我们分析了历史配对血浆和外周血单个核细胞(PBMC)/白膜层样本,以(i)量化CHIP患病率和变异等位基因频率(VAF)分布,(ii)表征归因于拷贝数变异(CNV)或比对伪影的低VAF胚系信号,(iii)通过整合片段组学、CNV背景和纵向VAF动态来鉴定肿瘤来源的体细胞变异,以及(iv)对仅基于血浆的肿瘤分数(TF)估算进行基准评估。数据由PredicineCARE和PredicineATLAS检测生成。 方法:我们回顾性分析了约1,000例血浆样本,涵盖前列腺癌、乳腺癌、结直肠癌、肺癌、胰腺癌及其他实体瘤,并配有配对的PBMC/白膜层标本。UMI感知流程对单核苷酸变异/插入/缺失/CNVs进行判定。对变异进行注释,包括CHIP驱动基因(例如DNMT3A、TET2、ASXL1、PPM1D、TP53、SF3B1/SRSF2/U2AF1、JAK2)、群体AF、热点及内部知识库。使用全基因组胚系SNP骨架对低VAF胚系事件进行判定,以解释在局部CNV下偏离约50%杂合期望的情况。我们训练并锁定了一个仅基于血浆的分类器(CHIP/胚系/体细胞),并从肿瘤归属的变异中估算突变来源的TF,两者均以配对正常样本标签作为基准。纵向分析(基线+随访,相隔数月)评估了VAF动态并进一步提高了肿瘤分数的检测灵敏度。 结果:CHIP普遍存在,以DNMT3A/TET2/ASXL1为主,仅少数为高VAF克隆;VAF分布在有和无TF标准化的情况下进行了汇总。低VAF胚系信号频繁出现但常由CNV驱动,通过SNP骨架模型得以解决。在单时间点血浆中,>95%的VAF>2%的CHIP变异被正确分类。当两次采血之间TF变化>2倍时,纳入纵向VAF动态可进一步区分低VAF CHIP,而肿瘤来源的变异则追踪反应/进展。仅基于血浆的TF与配对正常样本TF显示出极佳的一致性(一致性相关系数>0.95)。 结论:CHIP常见且常为低VAF;相当一部分表观低VAF胚系发现实际上反映了拷贝数诱导的VAF偏移。一种整合CNV感知胚系建模、CHIP基因背景、片段组学和纵向VAF动态的仅基于血浆的策略,可紧密再现配对正常样本的真值,在无配对PBMC/白膜层的情况下实现准确的体细胞判定和肿瘤分数估算。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Clonal hematopoiesis (CHIP) and germline variants commonly appear in cell-free DNA (cfDNA) and confound tumor genotyping. We analyzed historical paired plasma and Peripheral Blood Mononuclear Cell (PBMC)/buffy coat samples to (i) quantify CHIP prevalence and variant allele frequency (VAF) distributions, (ii) characterize low-VAF germline signals attributable to copy number variation (CNV) or alignment artifacts, (iii) identify tumor-derived somatic variants by integrating fragmentomics, CNV context, and longitudinal VAF dynamics, and (iv) benchmark plasma-only tumor-fraction (TF) estimation. Data were generated with the PredicineCARE and PredicineATLAS assays. Methods: We retrospectively profiled ~1,000 plasma samples spanning prostate, breast, colorectal, lung, pancreatic, and other solid tumors with matched PBMC/buffy coat specimens. UMI-aware pipelines called single nucleotide variants/insertions/deletions/CNVs. Variants were annotated for CHIP drivers (e.g., DNMT3A, TET2, ASXL1, PPM1D, TP53, SF3B1/SRSF2/U2AF1, JAK2 ), population AF, hotspots, and an in-house knowledge base. Low-VAF germline events were adjudicated using a genome-wide germline SNP skeleton to explain deviations from the ~50% heterozygous expectation under local CNV. We trained and locked a plasma-only classifier (CHIP/germline/somatic) and estimated mutation-derived TF from tumor-assigned variants, benchmarking both against matched-normal labels. Longitudinal analyses (baseline + follow-up, months apart) assessed VAF dynamics and further improved the tumor fraction detection sensitivity. Results: CHIP was prevalent and dominated by DNMT3A/TET2/ASXL1 , with a minority of high-VAF clones; VAF distributions were summarized with and without TF normalization. Low-VAF germline signals were frequent but often CNV-driven, resolved by the SNP-skeleton model. On single-timepoint plasma, >95% of CHIP variants with VAF > 2% were correctly classified. Incorporating longitudinal VAF dynamics further differentiated low-VAF CHIP when TF changed >2-fold between draws, while tumor-derived variants tracked response/progression. The plasma-only TF showed excellent concordance with matched-normal TF (concordance correlation coefficient > 0.95). Conclusions: CHIP is common and often low-VAF; a non-trivial fraction of apparent low-VAF germline findings reflect copy-number-induced VAF shifts. A plasma-only strategy that integrates CNV-aware germline modeling, CHIP gene context, fragmentomics, and longitudinal VAF dynamics closely reproduces matched-normal truth, enabling accurate somatic calling and tumor-fraction estimation without matched PBMC/buffy coat.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Zheng, Predicine, Inc. Employment. Y. Huang, Predicine, Inc. Employment. C. Dai, Predicine, Inc. Employment. J. Wang, Predicine, Inc. Employment. X. Wang, Predicine, Inc. Employment. P. Du, Predicine, Inc. Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索