PO.CL01.11 · 临床研究
创新性生物标志物发现:一种利用乳腺癌患者血浆和尿液进行无创、全面肿瘤表征的方法
Innovative biomarker discovery: A non-invasive, comprehensive tumor characterization approach with plasma and urine from breast cancer patients
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:来自血浆的循环游离DNA(cfDNA)分析已在乳腺癌的临床应用中展现出可观的潜力,然而尿液cfDNA仍较少被探索。在我们此前一项针对血浆来源及配对尿液cfDNA的初步研究(n=30)中,我们发现血浆和尿液可能是用于分子分析的互补性液体活检样本。
方法:在本研究中,我们扩大到更大的患者队列。为提高检测的敏感性,我们采用Urinary Analyte Stabilizer进行直接保存,这提高了尿液样本中cfDNA的产量和质量。我们利用QIAGEN的QIAseq Human Breast Cancer Panel、Element Biosciences的Aviti系统、CLC二级分析和QCI Interpret生物信息学解决方案,对来自乳腺癌患者的150份配对血浆和尿液样本进行了广泛分析。
结果:尿液中的cfDNA水平较血浆有所升高,但两种体液之间的相关性极小。与初步研究相比,验证研究实现了更高的测序精度以及增强的变异检测和识别能力。两种cfDNA来源均产生了定量和定性上可比的结果,血浆与尿液中体细胞变异的中位数分别为137个和131个。此外,53%的变异丰度超低,VAF<3%。变异在配对的血浆和尿液cfDNA样本中分布相似(致病性5% vs. 4%,可能致病性15% vs. 17%,意义未明变异VUS 73% vs. 76%)。我们在两种体液中发现了571个共有变异,每份样本共有致病性变异的中位数为14个。
结论:释放尿液cfDNA作为一种无创方法的临床价值,可能重新定义液体活检策略,为肿瘤演变和治疗反应提供更全面、更动态的视角。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Circulating cell-free DNA (cfDNA) profiling from blood plasma has demonstrated considerable potential for clinical applications in breast cancer, yet urinary cfDNA remains less explored. In a previous pilot study of plasma-derived and matching urinary cfDNA (n=30), we have found plasma and urines may be complementary liquid biopsy samples for molecular profiling.
Methods: In this study, we expand to a larger patient cohort. To enhance the sensitivity of the assay, we utilized direct preservation with Urinary Analyte Stabilizer, which led to improved yield and quality of cfDNA from urine samples. We conducted an extensive analysis of 150 matched plasma and urine samples from breast cancer patients utilizing QIAGEN's QIAseq Human Breast Cancer Panel, Element Biosciences' Aviti system, CLC secondary analysis and QCI Interpret bioinformatic solutions.Results: The cfDNA levels in urine were increased compared to plasma but with minimal correlation between the two body fluids. Compared to the pilot study the validation study achieved improved sequencing precision and enhanced variant detection and identification. Both cfDNA sources led to quantitatively and qualitatively comparable results with a median number of 137 vs. 131 somatic variants in plasma vs. urine. Further, 53% of the variants had a super low abundance with VAF< 3%. The variants were similarly distributed in matching plasma and urinary cfDNA samples (5 vs. 4% pathogenic, 15 vs. 17% likely pathogenic, 73 vs. 76% VUS). We found 571 shared variants among both body fluids with a median of 14 shared pathogenic variants per sample.
Conclusion: Unlocking the clinical utility of urinary cfDNA as a non-invasive approach could redefine liquid biopsy strategies, offering a more comprehensive and dynamic view of tumor evolution and therapeutic response.
利益披露 Disclosure
I. Nel,
Qiagen Travel.
Element Biosciences Travel.
E. Firsova,
Qiagen Travel.
L. Weydandt, None..
B. Aktas, None.