PO.CL05.07 · 临床研究
三级淋巴样结构(TLS)代表性细胞在冷肿瘤中引发对抗PD-1联合治疗的应答
Tertiary lymphoid structure (TLS) representative cells elicit response to anti-PD-1 + therapy in a cold tumor
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
肿瘤微环境(TME)内免疫细胞的组成与激活表型可显著影响基于PD-1的免疫治疗的疗效应答。利用Farcast TruTumor组织培养平台,我们研究了在免疫冷TME中出现意外抗PD-1应答的潜在促成因素。从知情同意的患者中采集新鲜切除的头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)样本(n=5)及配对血液。从肿瘤中制备外植体,并在培养中使用抗PD-1(Nivolumab,132 μg/ml)处理72小时。采用组织病理学和流式细胞术读出评估应答。在所分析的五个样本中,一个应答者(S2)相对于对照,肿瘤中表现出裂解的caspase-3表达升高(增加2.5倍)。有趣的是,与四个非应答者(NR)样本(平均免疫含量=4.5%)相比,该样本(免疫含量<2%)表现出冷肿瘤免疫微环境。为研究观察到的应答的潜在因素,我们评估了基线免疫谱。与NR样本相比,样本S2表现出更具异质性的Lo-SSC区室。其特征为高比例的CD23⁺滤泡B细胞(增加3.9倍)、CD11c⁺树突状细胞(增加1.5倍)以及表达DC-LAMP⁺的成熟树突状细胞(增加2.9倍)。这些亚群提示了通常存在于TLS中或与TLS相关的免疫细胞亚群。尽管应答者样本中CD8⁺T细胞的总体比例相对较低,但其早期(CD8⁺PD-1⁺)和晚期(CD8⁺CD39⁺)耗竭T细胞的比例均低15倍,同时干细胞样(CD8⁺TCF1⁺)T细胞增加12倍。在TruTumor平台上对肿瘤外植体进行离体培养后,应答者样本在处理组相对于未处理对照中表现出促炎M1巨噬细胞独特增加1.8倍,而在非应答者样本中未观察到明显变化。有趣的是,抗PD-1处理导致出现NKT细胞群(CD3⁺CD56⁺)以及表达Granzyme B的NK细胞增加(CD3⁻CD56⁺Granzyme B⁺)。总之,我们的数据揭示,对抗PD-1的应答并不仅仅取决于CD8⁺T细胞的丰度,还涉及TME内TLS代表性免疫亚群的重要贡献。具体而言,滤泡B细胞、干细胞样CD8⁺T细胞、CD11c⁺细胞和DC-LAMP⁺树突状细胞的存在,即使在其他方面为免疫贫乏表型的情况下,也可能促成治疗应答。TruTumor组织培养平台提供了一个转化模型,用于研究肿瘤对免疫治疗的应答,并深入洞察肿瘤应答如何超越TME中CD8⁺T细胞的单纯存在。
查看英文原文 English abstract
The composition and activation phenotype of immune cells within the tumor microenvironment (TME) can significantly influence therapeutic response to PD-1 based immunotherapy. Using the Farcast TruTumor histoculture platform, we investigated potential factors contributing to the unexpected anti-PD-1 responsiveness in an immune cold TME. Freshly resected Head and Neck Squamous Cell Carcinoma (HNSCC) samples (n=5) and matched blood were collected from consented patients. Explants were generated from the tumors and treated in culture with anti PD-1 (Nivolumab132 µg/ml) for 72 h. The response was evaluated using histopathology and flow cytometry readouts. Among the five samples analysed, one responder (S2) exhibited elevated cleaved caspase-3 expression (2.5-fold increase) in the tumor relative to the control. Interestingly, this sample (immune content <2%), exhibited a cold tumor immune microenvironment compared with the four non-responder (NR) samples (mean immune content = 4.5%). To investigate factors underlying the observed response, we evaluated the baseline immune profile. Sample S2 exhibited a more heterogenous Lo-SSC compartment compared to NR samples. This was characterized by a high proportion of CD23⁺ follicular B cells (3.9-fold increase), CD11c⁺ dendritic cells (1.5-fold increase), and DC-LAMP + expressing mature dendritic cells (2.9-fold increase) compared to NR samples. These sub-populations are indicative of immune cell subsets typically present in or associated with TLS. Although the responder sample contained a relatively low overall proportion of CD8⁺T cells, it exhibited 15 fold lower proportions of both early (CD8⁺PD-1⁺) and late (CD8⁺CD39⁺) exhausted T-cells, while displaying a 12-fold increase in stem-like (CD8⁺TCF1⁺) T cells. Upon ex vivo culture of tumor explants on TruTumor platform, the responder sample showed a distinct increase of 1.8-fold in pro-inflammatory M1 macrophages in the treated relative to the untreated control, whereas no appreciable change was observed in the non-responder samples. Interestingly, anti PD-1 treatment led to the emergence of an NKT-cell population (CD3⁺CD56⁺) and an increase in NK cells expressing Granzyme B (CD3⁻CD56⁺Granzyme B⁺). In summary, our data reveals that response to anti-PD-1 is not solely dependent on the abundance of CD8⁺ T cells but also involves substantial contributions from TLS representative immune sub-populations within the TME. Specifically, the presence of follicular B cells, stem-like CD8⁺ T cells, CD11c⁺ cells, and DC-LAMP + dendritic cells may contribute to treatment responsiveness, even in the context of an otherwise immune-poor phenotype. The TruTumor histoculture platform provides a translational model to study tumor response to immunotherapy with insights into how tumor responsiveness, transcends beyond mere presence of CD8 + T cells in the TME.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Sankaran,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
P. Chevour,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
K. Jaganathan,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
B. Das,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
M. Nath,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
A. Haseeb,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
J. Paul,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
V. A,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
O. M,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore, Employment.
R. M,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
J. C,
DBR & SK Super Speciality Hospital, Tirupati Employment.
V. T,
DBR & SK Super Speciality Hospital, Tirupati Employment.
M. Ganesh,
Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore Employment.
A. Prabha,
Vydehi Institute of Medical Sciences and Research Centre, Bangalore Employment.
P. Bv,
Sri Lakshmi Multi Speciality Hospital, Bangalore Employment.
U. K,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
M. Kapur,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
R. Malhotra,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
G. K,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
P. .,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.
M. Malhotra,
Farcast Biosciences India Pvt. Ltd., Bangalore Employment.