PO.ET03.05 · 实验与分子治疗
研究PLK4和GDF15在NSCLC致瘤性和EGFR-TKI耐药中的作用
Investigating the role of PLK4 and GDF15 in NSCLC tumorigenicity and EGFR-TKI resistance
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)占所有肺癌的近85%,对表皮生长因子受体(EGFR)酪氨酸激酶抑制剂(TKI)耐药的产生仍是一个重大临床挑战,限制了长期治疗成功。新出现的证据表明,PI3K/Akt和TGF-beta信号传导是EGFR-TKI耐药的关键驱动因素。Polo样激酶4(PLK4)是一种丝氨酸/苏氨酸激酶,调节中心粒复制并维持基因组稳定性,而其过表达可通过PI3K/Akt激活促进致癌转化和肿瘤进展。值得注意的是,PLK4驱动的信号传导与应激反应通路交叉,创造出有利于生存和治疗耐药的细胞环境。在此背景下,生长分化因子15(GDF15)是一种应激反应性细胞因子和TGF-beta超家族成员,在NSCLC中显著上调,尤其是在有吸烟史的患者中。GDF15通过TGF-beta和ErbB串扰促进转移、上皮-间质转化(EMT)和治疗耐药。此外,GDF15也正在成为NSCLC中的新型生物标志物和潜在治疗靶点,在EGFR-TKI耐药和增强致瘤性中发挥关键作用。
假设/目的:我们假设PLK4和GDF15的过表达通过PI3K-Akt-mTOR、TGF-beta和ErbB信号传导驱动NSCLC的肿瘤发生和EGFR-TKI耐药,调节这些关键生物标志物可能有助于降低致瘤性并克服耐药。
研究设计:我们在24和48小时CSE处理后,使用qPCR、Western印迹和免疫荧光检测耐药(奥希替尼耐药(OR)和厄洛替尼耐药(ER))和药物敏感(亲本)NSCLC细胞系中PLK4和GDF15的表达。
结果:免疫印迹分析显示,与亲本对照相比,PLK4蛋白表达水平在OR和ER NSCLC细胞系中均上调约2.0-4.0倍(p<0.05),强免疫荧光信号也支持这一点。定量PCR进一步显示,在奥希替尼和厄洛替尼耐药细胞中,GDF15显著上调1.4-3.4倍,尤其是在暴露于香烟烟雾提取物48小时后,提示与吸烟相关的应激可能进一步增强其表达。这些发现表明,PLK4和GDF15均有助于增强增殖能力、生存信号传导和维持耐药表型。
结论:总的来说,我们的数据表明,PLK4和GDF15的过表达激活PI3K/Akt/mTOR、TGF-beta和ErbB通路,促进EGFR-TKI耐药和NSCLC进展。靶向这些关键生物标志物可能有助于克服耐药并限制肿瘤生长,尤其是在与吸烟相关的NSCLC病例中。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background : Non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC) accounts for nearly 85% of all lung cancers, and the development of resistance to Epidermal Growth Factor Receptor (EGFR) Tyrosine Kinase Inhibitors (TKIs) remains a major clinical challenge, limiting long-term therapeutic success. Emerging evidence shows that PI3K/Akt and TGF-beta-signaling are key drivers of EGFR-TKI resistance. Polo-like kinase 4 (PLK4), a serine/threonine kinase, regulates centriole duplication and maintains genomic stability, while its overexpression can promote oncogenic transformation and tumor progression through PI3K/Akt activation. Notably, PLK4-driven signaling intersects with stress-responsive pathways, creating a cellular environment conducive to survival and therapeutic resistance. Within this context, Growth differentiation factor 15 (GDF15), a stress-responsive cytokine and member of the TGF-beta superfamily, is significantly upregulated in NSCLC, particularly in patients with a history of smoking. GDF15 promotes metastasis, epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT), and therapy resistance through TGF-beta and ErbB crosstalk. Moreover, GDF15 is also emerging as a novel biomarker and potential therapeutic target in NSCLC, playing a key role in EGFR-TKI resistance and enhancing tumorigenicity.
Hypothesis/Aims : We hypothesize that overexpression of PLK4 and GDF15 drives tumorigenesis and EGFR-TKI resistance through PI3K-Akt-mTOR, TGF-beta and ErbB signaling in NSCLC, and that modulating these key biomarkers may help reduce tumorigenicity and overcome resistance.
Study Design : We examined PLK4 and GDF15 expressions in drug-resistant - Osimertinib-resistant (OR) and Erlotinib-resistant (ER) and drug-sensitive (parental) NSCLC cell lines after 24- and 48-hour CSE treatment using qPCR, western blotting, and immunofluorescence.
Results : Immunoblot analyses revealed that PLK4 protein expression levels were upregulated by ~2.0- to 4.0-fold in both OR and ER NSCLC cell lines compared with parental controls (p < 0.05) also supported by strong immunofluorescence signals. Quantitative PCR further showed significant GDF15 upregulation from 1.4- to 3.4-fold in both Osimertinib and Erlotinib resistant cells particularly after 48 h of cigarette-smoke-extract exposure, suggesting that smoking-related stress may further enhance its expression. These findings indicate that both PLK4 and GDF15 contribute to enhanced proliferative capacity, survival signaling, and the maintenance of resistant phenotypes.
Conclusion : Collectively, our data suggests that overexpression of PLK4 and GDF15 activates PI3K/Akt/mTOR, TGF-beta, and ErbB pathways, promoting EGFR-TKI resistance and NSCLC progression. Targeting these key biomarkers may help overcome resistance and limit tumor growth, particularly in smoking-associated NSCLC cases.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Saravanaguru Vasanthi, None..
G. Kapetaneas, None..
M. Patel, None..
N. Puri, None.