PO.ET09.02 · 实验与分子治疗

高选择性HDAC6抑制剂:它们是免疫调节的答案吗?

Highly selective HDAC6 inhibitors: Are they the answer for immunomodulation?

海报缩略图:高选择性HDAC6抑制剂:它们是免疫调节的答案吗?
编号 7058 展板 5 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 12 主讲 Chiara Ripamonti, PhD
分会场 Epigenetic Modulators 2
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Silvia Rizzo, Edoardo Cellupica, Chiara Ripamonti, Grazia Rovelli, Barbara Vergani, Valeria Spadotto, Michela Bottani, Christian Steinkuhler, Gianluca Fossati

Italfarmaco S.p.A., Milan, Italy

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
泛HDAC抑制剂已被批准用于治疗血液系统恶性肿瘤,但尽管可触发直接和免疫介导的抗肿瘤效应,其在实体瘤中的应用仍因疗效不佳和显著副作用而受限。为克服这些局限,人们将注意力集中于选择性HDACi的开发。特别是,由于HDAC6参与肿瘤进展和免疫调节,选择性HDAC6抑制剂(HDAC6i)的开发受到关注。HDAC6敲除小鼠可存活且具有生育能力,提示选择性抑制可在毒性最小的情况下提供治疗益处。在HDAC6i中,基于异羟肟酸的化合物如ITF3756和ACY-1083已显示出高效力和选择性,尽管在高浓度下不能排除因与其他HDAC或非HDAC靶点结合而产生的脱靶效应。最近,基于二氟甲基-1,3,4-噁二唑(DFMO)的HDAC6i应运而生,提供了前所未有的选择性、延长的驻留时间以及不受异羟肟酸相关局限的困扰。我们团队合成了多种基于DFMO的HDAC6i,并通过评估激活的人单核细胞和CD3 T细胞中PD-L1表达和细胞因子产生来研究其免疫调节潜力。然而,只有ITF3756显著降低了PD-L1表达并调节了细胞因子释放,包括TNF-alpha、IL-1beta、IL-10、IFN-gamma和IL-17。DFMO化合物对这些免疫反应未表现出显著影响。这些发现提示,特异性HDAC6抑制可能无法重现选择性较低的抑制剂或HDAC6敲除模型中所观察到的免疫调节效应。为进一步探究这一差异,我们测试了旨在降解HDAC6的PROTAC-DFMO化合物,使用Cereblon(CRBN)或Von Hippel-Lindau(VHL)招募剂。两种PROTAC均有效且选择性地降解了HDAC6并增加了alpha-微管蛋白乙酰化。然而,只有CRBN连接的PROTAC降低了单核细胞中的细胞因子产生,我们确定这一效应可归因于泊马度胺(pomalidomide)招募剂本身。相比之下,VHL连接的PROTAC影响有限。所有PROTAC均未显著调节T细胞中的细胞因子产生。这些结果表明,单靠HDAC6降解不足以调节某些免疫细胞功能,提示可能需要更广泛的HDAC抑制才能实现有效的免疫调节活性。此外,我们的结果指出,降解剂在免疫学背景下的效应可能受其招募剂部分的影响,而非仅由靶点降解所驱动。总体而言,这项工作凸显了HDAC6对免疫调节贡献的复杂性,并提示尽管高选择性可能降低毒性,但它可能在免疫肿瘤学背景下限制治疗疗效。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Pan-HDAC inhibitors have been approved for the treatment of hematologic malignancies, but their use in solid tumors remains limited due to poor efficacy and significant side effects although direct and immune mediated antitumor effects can be triggered. To overcome these limitations, attention has been focused on the development of selective HDACi. In particular, the generation of selective HDAC6 inhibitors (HDAC6i) has gained interest, since its involvement in tumor progression and immune regulation. HDAC6 knockout mice are viable and fertile, suggesting that selective inhibition could offer therapeutic benefits with minimal toxicity. Among HDAC6i, hydroxamic acid-based compounds such as ITF3756 and ACY-1083 have shown high potency and selectivity, although off-target effects resulting from the binding to other HDACs or non-HDAC targets cannot be ruled out at high concentrations. More recently, difluoromethyl-1,3,4-oxadiazole (DFMO) -based HDAC6i have emerged, offering unprecedented selectivity, prolonged residence time and lack of hydroxamic acid-related limitations. Our group synthesized various DFMO-based HDAC6i and investigated their immunomodulatory potential by evaluating PD-L1 expression and cytokine production in activated human monocytes and CD3 T cells. However, only ITF3756 significantly reduced PD-L1 expression and modulated cytokine release, including TNF-alpha, IL-1beta, IL-10, IFN-gamma, and IL-17. DFMO compounds did not exhibit significant effects on these immune responses. These findings suggest that specific HDAC6 inhibition may fail to reproduce the immunomodulatory effects observed with less selective inhibitors or in HDAC6 knockout models. To further explore this discrepancy, we tested PROTAC-DFMO compounds designed to degrade HDAC6, using either Cereblon (CRBN) or Von Hippel-Lindau (VHL) recruiters. Both PROTACs effectively and selectively degraded HDAC6 and increased alpha-tubulin acetylation. However, only the CRBN-linked PROTAC reduced cytokine production in monocytes, an effect that we determined being attributable to the pomalidomide recruiter itself. In contrast, VHL-linked PROTACs had limited impact. None of the PROTACs significantly modulated cytokine production in T cells. These results indicate that HDAC6 degradation alone is not sufficient to modulate certain immune cell functions, suggesting that broader HDAC inhibition may be required to achieve effective immunomodulatory activity. Furthermore, our results point-out that the effects of degraders in an immunological context may be influenced by their recruiter moiety, rather than being solely driven by target degradation. Overall, this work highlights the complexity of HDAC6's contribution to immune regulation and suggests that while high selectivity may reduce toxicity, it could limit therapeutic efficacy in immuno-oncology contexts.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Rizzo, Italfarmaco Employment. E. Cellupica, Italfarmaco Employment. C. Ripamonti, Italfarmaco Employment. G. Rovelli, Italfarmaco Employment. B. Vergani, Italfarmaco Employment. V. Spadotto, Italfarmaco Employment. M. Bottani, Italfarmaco Employment. C. Steinkuhler, Italfarmaco Employment. G. Fossati, Italfarmaco Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索