PO.IM01.13 · 免疫学

三特异性ADC平台相较于双特异性ADC提供潜在的治疗优势

Tri-specific ADC platform offers potential therapeutic advantage over bi-specific ADC

海报缩略图:三特异性ADC平台相较于双特异性ADC提供潜在的治疗优势
编号 6939 展板 20 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 6 主讲 Yang Wang, PhD
分会场 Antibody-Drug Conjugates 2
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Yang Wang, Lixia Cao, Cui Feng, Fangdun Jiang, lixia Gu, Chen Li, Yifan Yang, Qi Zhang, Ming Zhou, Cancan Li, Wei Huang, Bonan Yan, Ziping Wei, Yuhong Zhou

Preclinical Research & Development, Bliss Biopharmaceutical Co., Ltd., Hangzhou, China

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
EGFR和HER3的共表达,连同其他肿瘤相关抗原(TAA,如c-MET、HER2、B7H3、PD-L1或其他),在多种人类肿瘤中频繁被观察到。同时靶向两个以上TAA带来了工程学挑战,但也提供了明显的优势:增强ADC对肿瘤细胞的亲合力、规避抗原丢失驱动的耐药、协同阻断信号通路间的串扰、缓解肿瘤异质性,以及扩大在各种癌症类型中的适用性。通过将一个臂同时具有HER3和EGFR亲和力,另一个臂具有对第三种TAA的亲和力相结合,我们开发了一种三特异性ADC平台。在TAA表达水平不等的细胞系中评估了结合和内化,以评价摄取效率。通过在多种对每种TAA中度表达的细胞系中进行剂量-反应实验测定了体外细胞毒性。在代表多种靶抗原谱的小鼠异种移植模型中测试了体内疗效,并与基准药物Izalonatamab brengitecan(BL-B01D1,EGFR/HER3双特异性ADC)和一种Amivantamab(EGFR/c-MET双特异性mAb)衍生的ADC进行比较。我们的结果显示,三特异性ADC表现出比EGFR/HER3双特异性ADC显著更快、更高效的内化,尤其是在EGFR和HER3中至低表达的细胞中。在体外,三特异性ADC达到了更低的IC50值,表明在广泛的肿瘤细胞系中增强了细胞毒性效力。在异种移植模型中,无论靶抗原表达如何异质,三特异性ADC相较于双特异性基准均提供了更优的肿瘤生长抑制。总之,三特异性ADC通过实现增强的肿瘤细胞结合、改善的内化以及更有效的细胞毒性药物递送,在体外和体内均相较于EGFR/HER3或c-MET双特异性药物提供了强大的优势。该策略有望在具有多样受体表达的肿瘤中获得更广泛的临床应用,并可能解决异质性癌症中的耐药问题。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Co-expression of EGFR and HER3, along with other tumor-associated antigen (TAA such as c-MET, HER2, B7H3, PD-L1, or others), is frequently observed across diverse human tumors. Targeting more than two TAAs simultaneously presents engineering challenges but offers distinct advantages: increased tumor cell avidity for ADCs, circumvention of antigen-loss-driven resistance, synergistic blockade of cross-talk between signaling pathways, mitigation of tumor heterogeneity, and broadened applicability across cancer types. A tri-specific ADC platform has been developed by combining one arm with both HER3 and EGFR affinities and another arm with affinity for a third TAA. Binding and internalization were assessed in cell lines with varying TAA expression levels to evaluate uptake efficiency. in vitro cytotoxicity was measured via dose-response assays across multiple lines with modest expression of each TAA. in vivo efficacy was tested in murine xenograft models representing diverse target antigen profiles, in comparison with benchmarks Izalonatamab brengitecan (BL-B01D1, EGFR/HER3 bispecific ADC) and an Amivantamab (EGFR/c-MET bispecific mAb )-derived ADC. Our results show that tri-specific ADCs exhibit significantly faster and more efficient internalization than the EGFR/HER3 bispecific ADC, particularly in cells with medium-to-low EGFR and HER3 expression. in vitro , tri-specific ADCs achieved lower IC50 values, indicating enhanced cytotoxic potency across a broad panel of tumor lines. In xenograft models, tri-specific ADCs delivered superior tumor growth inhibition relative to the bispecific benchmark, irrespective of heterogeneous target antigen expression. In conclusion, tri-specific ADCs offer a robust advantage in vitro and in vivo over EGFR/HER3 or c-MET bispecifics by enabling enhanced tumor cell binding, improved internalization, and more effective delivery of cytotoxic agents. This strategy holds promise for broader clinical application in tumors with varied receptor expressions and may address resistance in heterogeneous cancers.
利益披露 Disclosure
Y. Wang, None.. L. Cao, None.. C. Feng, None.. F. Jiang, None.. L. Gu, None.. C. Li, None.. Y. Yang, None.. Q. Zhang, None.. M. Zhou, None.. C. Li, None.. W. Huang, None.. B. Yan, None.. Z. Wei, None.. Y. Zhou, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索