PO.MCB04.01 · 分子与细胞生物学

评估未折叠蛋白反应作为透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的治疗靶点

Evaluating the unfolded protein response as a therapeutic target in clear cell renal cell carcinoma patients

海报缩略图:评估未折叠蛋白反应作为透明细胞肾细胞癌患者的治疗靶点
编号 7305 展板 17 时间 4/22 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 22 主讲 Timothy Shaw, D Phil
分会场 Hypoxic and Proteotoxic Stress Response
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Timothy Shaw1, Thushara Madanayake2, Darwin Chang3, Jay Mandula4, Alyssa Obermayer3, George J. Weiner5, Dan Spakowicz6, Bodour Salhia7, Martin McCarter8, Susanne Arnold9, Aakrosh Ratan10, Sheri L. Holmen11, Stephen B. Edge12, Julian Acevedo13, Ayanambakkam Attanathi14, Robert J. Rounbehler15, Michelle Churchman16, Ahmad Tarhini3, Jose R. Conejo-Garcia17, Brandon J. Manley18, Paulo C. Rodriguez3

1Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,2Yale School of Medicine, New Haven, CT,3Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,4The Ohio State University, Columbus, OH,5Director, University of Iowa Holden Comp. Cancer Center, Iowa City, IA,6The Ohio State University College of Medicine, Columbus, OH,7USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA,8University of Colorado Anschutz, Aurora, CO,9University of Kentucky, Lexington, KY,10The University of Virginia, Charlottesville, VA,11University of Utah Huntsman Cancer Institute, Salt Lake City, UT,12Roswell Park Comprehensive Cancer Center, Buffalo, NY,13Indiana University Simon Comprehensive Cancer Center, Indianapolis, IN,14University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center, Oklahoma City, OK,15Aster Insights, Tampa, FL,16Aster Insights, Hudson, FL,17Duke University School of Medicine, Durham, NC,18H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center & Research Institute, Tampa, FL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
转移性透明细胞肾细胞癌(ccRCC)是一种无法治愈的致死性疾病。虽然ccRCC的治疗已转向抗血管生成和免疫治疗联合方案,但长期缓解仍属罕见,凸显了对新型治疗靶点的迫切需求。我们此前在小鼠模型中证明,通过介导因子PKR样ER激酶(PERK)对未折叠蛋白反应(UPR)进行治疗性靶向,可逆转肿瘤进展、免疫抑制以及对免疫检查点阻断(ICB)的耐药(Mandula等,Cancer Cell,2022)。目前早期临床研究正在评估PERK抑制作为实体瘤(包括ccRCC)的治疗策略。在此,我们采用一种分析框架从转录组数据估算PERK活性,对ccRCC患者进行了回顾性分析。我们评估了三个独立的ccRCC患者数据集——接受ICB治疗的iATLAS患者(n = 296)、接受ICB治疗的ORIEN AVATAR患者(n = 85),以及一个TCGA初治队列(n = 534)。在这些数据集中,PERK表达与进展风险增加和总生存期变差相关。为评估PERK在内质网(ER)应激背景下的作用,我们使用CRISPR gRNA在ccRCC细胞系中构建了PERK敲除模型,随后用ER应激剂thapsigargin对细胞进行处理。有趣的是,我们发现了让人联想到未解决的未折叠蛋白反应的胞质空泡化、ER肿胀以及蛋白质稳态破坏。此外,PERK抑制剂AMG44与thapsigargin联合处理显著降低了ccRCC细胞的活力。为进一步评估PERK抑制在标准治疗过程中的治疗潜力,我们评估了其在VEGF阻断期间的影响。我们观察到,PERK沉默的细胞在暴露于cabozantinib(VEGF抑制剂)后,无论是通过药物抑制还是基因缺失,细胞活力均降低。总之,随着临床对PERK抑制(PERKi)在多种实体瘤中的兴趣日益增长,我们的发现凸显了PERK作为ccRCC潜在治疗靶点的价值,并鉴定出可能为未来临床策略提供信息的相关生物标志物。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Metastatic clear cell renal cell carcinoma (ccRCC) is an incurable and lethal disease. While treatment of ccRCC has shifted toward antiangiogenic and immunotherapy combinations, long-term response is rare, underscoring the urgent need for novel therapeutic targets. We previously demonstrated in a murine model that therapeutic targeting of the unfolded protein response (UPR) via the mediator PKR-like ER kinase (PERK) can reverse tumor progression, immune suppression, and resistance to immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) (Mandula et al. Cancer Cell. 2022). Early-phase clinical studies are now evaluating PERK inhibition as a therapeutic strategy in solid tumors, including ccRCC. Here, we performed a retrospective analysis of patients with ccRCC using an analytical framework to estimate PERK activity from transcriptome data. We evaluated three independent ccRCC patient data sets - iATLAS patients treated with ICB (n = 296), ORIEN AVATAR patients treated with ICB (n = 85), and a TCGA treatment-naive cohort (n = 534). Across these datasets, PERK expression was associated with increased progression risk and worse overall survival. To evaluate the role of PERK in the context of endoplasmic reticulum (ER) stress, we generated a PERK knockout model using CRISPR gRNA in ccRCC cell lines and then challenged the cells with an ER stressor, thapsigargin. Interestingly, we found cytoplasmic vacuolization reminiscent of an unresolved unfolded protein response, ER swelling, and proteostasis disruption. Moreover, joint treatment with the PERK inhibitor AMG44 and thapsigargin significantly reduced viability in ccRCC cells. To further assess the therapeutic potential of PERK inhibition during standard-of-care therapy, we evaluated its impact during VEGF blockade. We observed decreased cell viability in PERK-silenced cells following cabozantinib (VEGF inhibitor) exposure, either through drug inhibition or genetic deletion. In summary, as clinical interest in PERK inhibition (PERKi) grows across multiple solid tumors, our findings highlight PERK as a potential therapeutic target in ccRCC and identify associated biomarkers that may inform future clinical strategies.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Shaw, None.. T. Madanayake, None.. J. Mandula, None.. G. J. Weiner, None.. J. Acevedo, None.. A. Attanathi, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索