PO.TB06.01 · 肿瘤生物学
在局部晚期 HNSCC 非手术治疗中,对顺铂存在医学禁忌证的患者接受同步全身治疗的生存结局:一项 NCDB 研究
Survival outcomes with concurrent systemic therapy in patients with a medical contraindication to cisplatin in the non-operative management of locally advanced HNSCC, an NCDB Study
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
局部晚期头颈部鳞状细胞癌(HNSCC)的标准非手术治疗方案是根治性放疗联合同步顺铂。NRG-HN004 研究证实了同步西妥昔单抗(cetuximab)在对顺铂存在医学禁忌证患者中的获益,这些患者包括年龄大于 70 岁且 Charlson-Deyo(CD)评分≥1 者,以及年龄小于 70 岁且 CD 评分≥2 者。在这些人群中,同步全身治疗的生存获益可能因合并症而受限。我们在美国国家癌症数据库(NCDB)中评估了这些人群的总生存期(OS),比较了接受放疗联合同步化疗与放疗联合同步免疫治疗(考虑到西妥昔单抗是该适应证唯一获 FDA 批准的免疫治疗药物,故最可能为西妥昔单抗)的患者。检索 NCDB 中 2015-2023 年的数据,纳入符合 HN-004 标准的 III、IVa 和 IVb 期非转移性 HNSCC 患者。鳞状细胞癌(SCC)的组织学亚型采用 ICD-O-3 编码 8070-8078 识别。纳入原发灶明确、临床分期为 T3-T4 和/或临床淋巴结阳性的患者。剔除接受放疗剂量低于 60 Gy 的患者。根据放疗联合化疗(RT-C)或放疗联合免疫治疗(RT-I)对患者进行分层,两组无重叠。同步全身治疗定义为在放疗开始 30 天内启动。采用 Kaplan-Meier(KM)统计评估 OS,采用 log-rank 检验评估组间差异。p<0.05 视为具有统计学意义。为尽量减少信息性删失的影响,2023 年 1 月 1 日后无记录随访的患者被计为死亡,除非其观察随访时间超过 5 年。此外,KM 估计值以 5 年为上限。共识别出 6299 例患者:5657 例接受 RT-C,642 例接受 RT-I。RT-C 和 RT-I 的 2 年 OS 分别为 65.0%(95% CI,63.8-66.3)和 52.9%(95% CI,49.2-57.0)。RT-C 和 RT-I 的 5 年 OS 分别为 20.7%(95% CI,19.6-21.9)和 21.8%(95% CI,18.7-25.5)。KM 分析最终显示两个治疗队列间无显著差异(log-rank p=0.059)。在对顺铂存在医学禁忌证的患者亚组中,在这一真实世界数据集中,对于局部晚期 HNSCC,同步化疗相较于同步免疫治疗(可能为西妥昔单抗)在 OS 上未见有统计学意义的改善。关键的是,同步化疗所见的早期生存获益在长期随访中消失,可能是由于这一合并症负担沉重的人群中因其他原因导致的死亡。仍需进一步的前瞻性研究,以评估在这一体弱人群中同步化疗相较于西妥昔单抗的获益。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Standard-of-care non-operative management for locally advanced head & neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) is definitive radiation with concurrent cisplatin. NRG-HN004 demonstrated the benefit of concurrent cetuximab in patients with a medical contraindication to cisplatin including those older than 70 with a Charleson-Deyo (CD) score ≥ 1 and those under 70 with a CD score ≥ 2. In these populations, the survival benefits of concurrent systemic therapies may be limited due to medical co-morbidities. We evaluated overall survival (OS) of these populations in the National Cancer Database (NCDB) comparing radiation-treated patients who received concurrent chemotherapy against concurrent immunotherapy (most likely cetuximab given it is the only FDA-approved immunotherapy for this indication). The NCDB was queried for data from 2015-2023 to include stage III, IVa, and IVb non-metastatic HNSCC patients that met the HN-004 criteria. Histological subtypes of squamous cell carcinoma (SCC) were identified using ICD-O-3 codes 8070-8078. Patients with clinical T3-T4 and/or clinically node-positive disease with a known primary were included. Patients who received less than 60 Gy were excluded. Groups were stratified based on radiation with chemotherapy (RT-C) or radiation with immunotherapy (RT-I) without overlap. Concurrent systemic therapy was defined as having started within 30 days of the initiation of radiation. OS was evaluated using Kaplan-Meier (KM) statistics and differences were evaluated using log-rank testing. A p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. To minimize the effect of informative censoring, patients without documented follow-up after January 1, 2023 were counted as deaths unless they had greater than 5 years of observed follow-up. Additionally, KM estimates were capped at 5 years. A total of 6299 patients were identified: 5657 treated with RT-C and 642 treated with RT-I. 2-year OS was 65.0% (95% CI, 63.8-66.3) and 52.9% (95% CI, 49.2-57.0) for RT-C and RT-I, respectively. 5-year OS was 20.7% (95% CI, 19.6-21.9) and 21.8% (95% CI, 18.7-25.5) for RT-C and RT-I, respectively. KM analysis ultimately showed no significant difference between the two treatment cohorts (log-rank p=0.059). In a subgroup of patients with medical contraindications to cisplatin, there was no statistically significant improvement in OS with concurrent chemotherapy over concurrent immunotherapy (likely cetuximab) for locally advanced HNSCC in this real-world dataset. Critically, early survival benefits seen with concurrent chemotherapy dissipate with long-term follow-up possibly due to deaths from other causes in this population with extensive co-morbidity. Further prospective study is needed to evaluate the benefit of concurrent chemotherapy over cetuximab in this frail population.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. C. Demircioglu, None..
S. Singh, None..
J. Belcher, None..
J. Zenga, None..
S. J. Wong, None..
M. Awan, None.