PO.IM03.01 · 免疫学

弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤对EBV癌蛋白的依赖性

Dependencies of diffuse large B-cell lymphoma on EBV oncoproteins

海报缩略图:弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤对EBV癌蛋白的依赖性
编号 206 展板 1 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 10 主讲 Lily Wenger, BS
分会场 Virology and Cancer
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Lily Catherine Foreman Wenger1, Quincy Rosemarie2, Eric C. Johannsen2

1McArdle Laboratory for Cancer Research, University of Wisconsin-Madison, Madison, WI,2University of Wisconsin - Madison, Madison, WI

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:多达14%的弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)为EB病毒阳性(EBV+),其生长和存活依赖于EBV潜伏基因产物。DLBCL是一组异质性的侵袭性淋巴瘤,我们此前发现EBV与BN2 LymphGen亚型相关。此外,相对于EBV-肿瘤,EBV+肿瘤中多个基因以较低频率发生突变,提示病毒癌基因在功能上取代了宿主驱动突变。为鉴定EBV+ DLBCL所必需的EBV癌基因及其失活的功能性后果,我们正在EBV+ DLBCL细胞系中开展CRISPR/Cas13d筛选。 方法:使用全外显子组测序(WES)、RNA测序(RNA-seq)和免疫印迹对EBV+ DLBCL细胞系(Farage、BCKN1、IBL1和IBL4)进行表征。我们比较了EBV+肿瘤和细胞系的突变和转录组图谱,以指导CRISPR/Cas13d功能筛选。这些筛选旨在鉴定EBV+ DLBCL中的EBV基因产物依赖性及其对细胞生长和存活的影响。 结果:WES分析揭示了每个EBV+ DLBCL细胞系的遗传亚型:Farage被归类为ST2,其余归类为“其他”。RNA-seq和免疫印迹显示,所有细胞系均表达一种非典型的III型潜伏程序,其特征是缺乏LMP2A表达。这种新型潜伏基因程序在EBV+ DLBCL肿瘤中也被观察到。除IBL1外,所有细胞系均感染EBV1,而据我们所知,IBL1是唯一已知感染EBV1/EBV2型间重组体的细胞系。通过采用Cas13d进行敲低筛选,我们能够确定复杂的EBV潜伏转录组中对EBV+ DLBCL生长和存活至关重要的特定转录本。靶向RNA还可避免使用Cas9靶向每个细胞中10-20个拷贝的EBV DNA所产生的过度DNA损伤和低敏感性。我们已在每个细胞系中稳定表达两种不同的Cas13d同源物,并正在使用基于FACS的瞬时敲低策略优化其RNA敲低效率。使用实现最高效敲低的克隆,将使我们能够鉴定必需的EBV潜伏基因,并确定失活每个必需病毒癌基因的表型后果(生长停滞、凋亡等)。 结论:EBV+ DLBCL表现出独特的宿主突变和基因表达图谱,包括用EBV癌基因取代若干定义亚型的突变。现有的EBV+ DLBCL细胞系忠实地模拟了ST2或“其他”LymphGen亚型,并表现出与肿瘤相同的非典型EBV潜伏基因表达模式。通过确定EBV癌基因的依赖性及其失活的效应,我们旨在揭示EBV如何与宿主驱动突变协同参与EBV+ DLBCL的发病机制。理解这些治疗靶点脆弱性将为精准治疗奠定基础。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background : Up to 14% of diffuse large B-cell lymphomas (DLBCL) are Epstein-Barr virus-positive (EBV+), and their growth and survival are dependent on EBV latency gene products. DLBCL is a heterogeneous group of aggressive lymphomas, and we previously found that EBV is associated with the BN2 LymphGen subtype. Additionally, multiple genes were mutated at lower frequencies in EBV+ tumors relative to EBV-, suggesting viral oncogenes functionally replace host driver mutations. To identify the EBV oncogenes essential for EBV+ DLBCL and the functional consequences of their inactivation, we are conducting CRISPR/Cas13d screens in EBV+ DLBCL cell lines. Methods : EBV+ DLBCL cell lines (Farage, BCKN1, IBL1, and IBL4) were characterized using whole-exome sequencing (WES), RNA sequencing (RNA-seq), and immunoblotting. We compared the mutational and transcriptomic profiles of EBV+ tumors and cell lines to inform CRISPR/Cas13d functional screens. These screens aim to identify EBV gene product dependencies in EBV+ DLBCL and the impact on cell growth and survival. Results : WES analysis revealed the genetic subtype of each EBV+ DLBCL cell line: Farage was classified as ST2, and the rest were classified as “Other”. RNA-seq and immunoblotting revealed that all expressed an atypical latency III program, characterized by the absence of LMP2A expression. This novel latent gene program was also observed in the EBV+ DLBCL tumors. All cell lines were infected with EBV1, except IBL1, which, to our knowledge, is the only known cell line infected with an EBV1/EBV2 intertypic recombinant. By employing Cas13d for our knockdown screen, we can determine the specific transcripts within the complex EBV latent transcriptome that are essential for the growth and survival of EBV+ DLBCL. Targeting RNA also avoids excessive DNA damage and low sensitivity that arises from targeting 10-20 copies of EBV DNA per cell with Cas9. We have stably expressed two different Cas13d orthologs in each cell line and are optimizing their RNA knockdown efficiency using a FACS-based transient knockdown strategy. Use of clones achieving the most efficient knockdown will allow us to identify essential EBV latent genes and determine the phenotypic consequences (growth arrest, apoptosis, etc.) of inactivating each essential viral oncogene. Conclusions : EBV+ DLBCL exhibits distinct host mutation and gene expression profiles, including the replacement of several subtype-defining mutations with EBV oncogenes. The available EBV+ DLBCL cell lines faithfully model the ST2 or “Other” LymphGen subtypes and exhibit the same atypical EBV latent gene expression pattern as tumors. By determining EBV oncogene dependencies and the effects of their inactivation, we aim to uncover how EBV cooperates with host driver mutations in the pathogenesis of EBV+ DLBCL. Understanding these therapeutic vulnerabilities will provide a foundation for precision therapy.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. C. Wenger, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索