PO.PR02.03 · 预防研究

一项旨在提升结直肠癌认知的社区随机对照试验的初步结果:社区遗传导航参与专家(CoGENES)项目

Preliminary results of a community-based randomized controlled trial to raise colorectal cancer awareness: The Community Genetic Navigation Engagement Specialist (CoGENES) Program

编号 923 展板 5 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 36 主讲 Diego Alvarez-Lopez, MPH
分会场 Cancer in the Community: Epidemiology, Experimental Knowledge, Action, and Communication
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Bianca Rosales1, Diego Alvarez-Lopez2, Janet Rodriguez3, Joel Sanchez Mendez2, Charité N. Ricker4, Rosa Barahona2, Heinz Josef Lenz4, Lourdes Baezconde-Garbanati4, Mariana C. Stern5

1USC Norris Westside Cancer Ctr., Inglewood, CA,2USC - University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA,3USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA,4Keck School of Medicine of USC, Los Angeles, CA,5Associate Professor, Dept. of Prev. Medicine, USC Norris Comprehensive Cancer Center, Los Angeles, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:在洛杉矶县(LAC)的许多社区中,对结直肠癌(CRC)预防和基因检测的知识与认知仍然有限。为解决这一问题,我们通过培训师培训项目培训了42名CRC专业社区卫生工作者(CoGENES)。我们在此展示一项社区随机对照试验(RCT)的初步结果,该试验旨在评估CoGENES提供的材料和培训的影响,作为USC由NCI资助的PE-CGS网络项目的一部分。 方法:一项双臂、单盲RCT于2024年8月启动。参与者年龄≥18岁且为洛杉矶县居民。干预包括由CoGENES提供的一次教育课程以及一份预先制定的教育手册。对照组接受标准的CRC和基因检测材料。在基线时通过经验证或团队自行开发的调查收集了人口统计学、文化适应、文化价值观与宿命论、健康素养、计算能力、一般自我效能(GSE)、基因组知识、癌症预防行为和态度等数据。在干预接受后6-12周和6-8个月进行的随访调查评估了GSE、基因组知识和癌症预防行为的变化。配对饮食变化采用McNemar检验进行评估。分别采用配对t检验和独立t检验比较各组内部和组间的基线与随访结果。 结果:共138名参与者(平均年龄=48.8岁,SD=13.6)被随机分配至干预组(n=72)或对照组(n=66),基线无差异。所有参与者均为西班牙裔/拉丁裔,大多数为女性(83%)、墨西哥人(64%)、天主教徒(61%)、已婚(50%)、完成≤11年级教育(51%),并主要说西班牙语(69%)。中期分析显示,至6-8周时,干预组参与者的饮食行为有所改善,限制加工食品摄入的比例更高(很少或从不:基线时48.6% vs 随访时69.8%;p<0.05)。我们观察到干预组在6-12周时癌症遗传知识显著改善,正确答案更多(平均差异=4.32;p<0.01),“不知道”回答更少(平均差异=-5.40;p<0.01)。这些改善大于对照组:正确答案多2.7个(p<0.01),“不知道”回答少3.25个(p<0.01)。遗传素养和理解得分也有所提高(平均差异=11.38;p<0.01),但相较于对照组的提高并不显著(双重差分=2.20;p=0.43)。 结论:我们提供了初步证据,表明在社区环境中部署经过CRC预防培训的教育者可能改善CRC遗传知识,并凸显了改善生活方式和饮食模式以降低CRC发病率的机会和意愿。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Knowledge and awareness of colorectal cancer (CRC) prevention and genetic testing remain limited in many Los Angeles County (LAC) communities. To address this, we trained 42 CRC-specialized community health workers (CoGENES) through a train-the-trainer program. We present preliminary results of a community-based randomized controlled trial (RCT) to evaluate the impact of materials and training delivered by CoGENES as part of an NCI funded PE-CGS network program at USC. Methods: A two-armed, single blinded RCT was launched in August 2024. Participants are ≥ 18 years of age and residents of LAC. The intervention included the delivery of an educational session by CoGENES and an a priori developed educational handbook. The control group received standard CRC and genetic testing materials. Data on demographics, acculturation, cultural values and fatalism, health literacy, numeracy, generalized self-efficacy (GSE), genomic knowledge, cancer prevention behaviors and attitudes, were collected at baseline with validated or team-developed surveys. Follow-up surveys at 6-12 weeks and 6-8 months after intervention receipt evaluate changes in GSE, genomic knowledge, and cancer prevention behaviors. Paired dietary changes were evaluated using McNemar's test. Paired t-tests and independent t-tests were used to compare baseline and follow-up results within and between arms, respectively. Results: A total of 138 participants (mean age = 48.8 years, SD = 13.6) were randomized to the intervention (n = 72) or control (n = 66) arm, with no baseline differences. All were Hispanic/Latine, most were female (83%), Mexican (64%), Catholic (61%), married (50%), completed ≤11 th grade education (51%), and spoke primarily Spanish (69%). Interim analyses showed that by 6-8 weeks, participants in the intervention arm demonstrated improved dietary behaviors, with a higher proportion limiting processed food intake (rarely or never: 48.6% at baseline vs 69.8% at follow-up; p <0.05). We observed significant improvements in cancer genetic knowledge within the intervention arm at 6-12 weeks, with more correct answers (mean difference = 4.32; p <0.01), and fewer “don't know” responses (mean difference = -5.40; p<0.01). These improvements were greater than in the control arm: 2.7 more correct answers (p<0.01) and 3.25 fewer “don't know” responses (p<0.01). Genetic literacy and comprehension scores also improved (mean difference = 11.38; p < 0.01), though not significantly more than in the control group (difference-in-differences = 2.20; p = 0.43). Conclusion: We present preliminary evidence that deploying CRC prevention trained educators in a community setting, may improve CRC genetic knowledge, and highlights opportunities and willingness to improve lifestyle and dietary patterns to reduce CRC incidence.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Alvarez-Lopez, None.. J. Rodriguez, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索