PO.PS01.04 · 人群科学
LGBTQ+癌症患者身体与心理健康相关生活质量的交叉性分析
An intersectional analysis of physical and mental health-related quality of life among LGBTQ+ patients with cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:既往研究报告LGBTQ+癌症患者的健康相关生活质量(HRQOL)较差,但对于其LGBTQ+身份如何与种族和族裔交叉,人们知之甚少。本研究以交叉性理论和少数群体收益递减理论为指导,旨在探讨这些身份交叉对癌症患者HRQOL的影响。我们假设,种族族裔多样化的LGBTQ+癌症患者的HRQOL较差。
方法:自报数据取自97,346名患者,其中3,353名自我认定为LGBTQ+,他们完成了一份标准诊疗电子问卷,内容包括人口统计学、心理社会测量及经过验证的12项简明健康调查(SF-12)。性取向(SO)和性别认同(GI)用于识别性少数群体、性别少数群体及顺性别异性恋者。SF-12分数用于计算身体健康总分(PCS)和心理健康总分(MCS)。年龄校正的广义线性模型使用SAS(9.4版)估计交叉身份的MCS和PCS均值。在SO分析中,参照组为非西班牙裔白人异性恋患者;而在GI分析中,参照组为非西班牙裔白人顺性别男性患者。
结果:在按SO进行的交叉分析中,分析了39个身份。20个身份与较低的MCS相关,其中白人异性恋和西班牙裔多种族女同性恋/男同性恋患者的分数具有统计学显著性的降低。对于PCS,23个身份与较低分数相关,但只有性取向未指明的多种族非西班牙裔患者的PCS显著较低。未披露性取向的黑人西班牙裔患者的PCS显著更高。在按GI进行的交叉分析中,43个身份中有26个与较低的MCS相关,其中白人西班牙裔跨性别者、白人顺性别女性及非西班牙裔亚裔患者的分数显著较低。对于PCS,26个身份与较低分数相关,但只有西班牙裔夏威夷原住民或其他太平洋岛民顺性别男性的PCS显著较低。当以非西班牙裔白人异性恋顺性别男性为参照将SO+GI合并时,20个身份的MCS显著较低,包括非西班牙裔亚裔异性恋跨性别男性和非西班牙裔多种族性别酷儿患者。对于PCS,24个群体的分数显著较低,包括西班牙裔美洲印第安人/阿拉斯加原住民顺性别男性和具有其他GI的非西班牙裔多种族双性恋者。
结论:这项按LGBTQ+身份、种族和族裔进行的交叉身份分析凸显了收集详细人口统计信息以揭示癌症相关差异的重要性,并强调了向不成比例地经历更差HRQOL的人群提供个性化诊疗和支持性服务的必要性。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Prior studies report that LGBTQ+ patients with cancer report poorer health-related quality of life (HRQOL), but very little is known about how their LGBTQ+ identity intersects with their race and ethnicity. Guided by Intersectionality and Minorities' Diminished Returns theories, this study sought to explore the impact of the intersection of these identities on cancer patients' HRQOL. We hypothesize that ethnoracially diverse LGBTQ+ cancer patients will have poorer HRQOL.
Methods : Self-reported data were obtained from 97,346 patients, of whom 3,353 self-identified as LGBTQ+, who completed a standard-of-care electronic questionnaire including demographics, psychosocial measures, and the validated Short Form Health Survey-12. Sexual orientation (SO) and gender identity (GI) were used to identify sexual minorities, gender minorities, and cisgender heterosexual persons. SF-12 scores were used to calculate the Physical Component Summary (PCS) and Mental Component Summary (MCS). Age-adjusted generalized linear models estimate mean MCS and PCS for intersectional identities using SAS (version 9.4). For the SO analyses, the reference group was non-Hispanic White heterosexual patients; while for GI analyses, it was non-Hispanic White cisgender male patients.
Results: For the intersectional analyses by SO, 39 identities were analyzed. Twenty identities were associated with lower MCS, of which White Heterosexual and Hispanic multiracial lesbian/gay patients had statistically significantly lower scores. For PCS, 23 identities were associated with lower scores, but only while multiracial non-Hispanics with unspecified SO had significantly lower PCS. PCS was significantly higher among Black Hispanic patients who did not disclose their sexual orientation. For the intersectional analyses by GI, 26 of 43 identities were associated with lower MCS, of which White Hispanic transgender, White cisgender females, and Non-Hispanic Asian patients had significantly lower scores. For PCS, 26 identities were associated with lower scores, but only Hispanic Native Hawaiian or other PI Cisgender males had significantly lower PCS. When SO+GI were combined with non-Hispanic White straight cisgender males as the reference, 20 identities had significantly lower MCS, including non-Hispanic Asian straight transgender males and non-Hispanic multiracial genderqueer patients. For PCS, 24 groups had significantly lower scores, including Hispanic American Indian/AN cisgender males and non-Hispanic multiracial bisexuals with other GI.
Conclusions : This analysis of intersectional identities by LGBTQ+ status, race, and ethnicity highlights the importance of collecting detailed demographics to reveal cancer-related disparities and underscores the need for personalized care and the delivery of supportive services to populations disproportionately experiencing worse HRQOL.
利益披露 Disclosure
R. F. Trejos, None..
S. Zamani, None..
M. B. Schabath, None.