PO.PS01.10 · 人群科学

慢性应激源、生物学年龄与黑人乳腺癌幸存者的缺陷累积衰弱

Chronic stressors, biological age and deficit accumulation frailty in black breast cancer survivors

海报缩略图:慢性应激源、生物学年龄与黑人乳腺癌幸存者的缺陷累积衰弱
编号 866 展板 12 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 34 主讲 Jeanne Mandelblatt, MD;MPH
分会场 Survivorship Research
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Jeanne S. Mandelblatt1, Iwalola Awoyinka2, Jamaica R. Robinson3, Xingtao Zhou1, Julie Ruterbusch4, Jaeil Ahn1, Lucile L. Adams-Campbell5, Steven Cole6, Ann G. Schwartz3, Brent Small7, Zhaoming Wang8, Kelly Rentscher9, Judith E. Carroll6

1Oncology, Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Center, Georgetown University, Washington, DC,2Medical College of Wisconsin, Wauwatosa, WI,3Karmanos Cancer Institute, Detroit, MI,4Wayne State University, Detroit, MI,5Georgetown Lombardi Comprehensive Cancer Ctr., Washington, DC,6UCLA, Los Angeles, CA,7University of North Carolina, Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, VA,8St. Jude Children's Research Hospital, Memphis, TN,9Oncology, Medical College of Wisconsin, Milwaukee, WI

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:慢性社会应激源是人群发病率和死亡率差异的一个原因。这些模式的一个假定机制是:不同人群亚群体所经历的应激源不同,会导致累积性的磨损,从而通过持续释放应激激素而加速生物学衰老。然而,这些关系在癌症幸存者中尚未得到充分研究。 方法:这项横断面研究纳入了来自底特律癌症幸存者研究(Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors)的258名黑人女性。幸存者为1-3期乳腺癌确诊后12-60个月,并有可用于甲基化分析的种系DNA。生物学年龄采用Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC芯片评估,包括GrimAge、PhenoAge、外源性年龄(Extrinsic Age)和Dunedin衰老步伐(Dunedin Pace of Aging)。社会应激源包括生活压力(经济、住房和食物不安全、缺乏就医交通、地区安全;0-5分综合评分)、种族歧视和邻里地区剥夺。结局为缺陷累积衰弱指数评分(0-1;<0.20=健壮,0.20-0.35=衰弱前期,>0.35=衰弱;0.02-0.06分的差异具有临床意义)。分别采用线性回归模型检验各应激源与缺陷累积之间的关联,并考虑年龄、距确诊时间及细胞毒性治疗(化疗、放疗)。中介模型探讨了应激源与缺陷累积之间的关系是否在统计学上由生物学年龄介导。 结果:幸存者平均年龄为58.8岁(范围30-83),距确诊21.1(SD 14.6)个月,69.6%处于衰弱前期或衰弱。55-78%的人在一种或多种表观遗传时钟上的生物学年龄大于实际年龄,88%的人衰老步伐快于基于实际年龄的预期。生活压力每增加1分,校正后的缺陷累积增加0.06分(p<0.001),生活压力占缺陷累积可解释方差的67%。由GrimAge测量的生物学年龄介导了生活压力与缺陷累积之间关联的11.8%(p<0.05),其他表观遗传测量指标也有类似但无统计学意义的介导作用。居住在最剥夺(相对于最不剥夺)地区也与校正后缺陷累积具有临床意义的大幅增加相关(p=0.007),但歧视的影响较小且无统计学意义。 结论:这些发现表明,在黑人乳腺癌幸存者中,经历社会应激源与缺陷累积衰弱之间存在关联,且这种关联部分由生物学衰老驱动。未来的研究需要确定衰老通路及可能的可改变因素,从而通过政策、行为和药物干预加以针对,以减少差异并改善癌症幸存者的结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction : Chronic social stressors contribute to disparities in population morbidity and mortality. One putative mechanism for these patterns is that stressors, which are differentially experienced by population sub-groups, result in cumulative wear and tear that increases biological aging via sustained release of stress hormones. However, these relationships have not been well studied in cancer survivors. Methods : This cross-sectional study included 258 Black women from the Detroit Research on Cancer Survivors study. Survivors were 12-60 months post-diagnosis of stage 1-3 breast cancer and had germline DNA available for methylation analyses. Biological age was assessed using the Illumina Infinium Methylation EPIC Array for GrimAge, PhenoAge, Extrinsic Age and Dunedin Pace of Aging. Social stressors included life stress (financial, housing and food insecurity, lack of transportation to medical care, area safety; 0-5 composite score), racial discrimination and neighborhood area deprivation. The outcome was a deficit accumulation frailty index score (0-1; <0.20=robust, 0.20-0.35=pre-frail and >0.35=frail; differences of 0.02-0.06 points are clinically meaningful). Separate linear regression models tested associations of each stressor and deficit accumulation, considering age, time from diagnosis and cytotoxic treatment (chemotherapy, radiotherapy). Mediation models explored whether the relationships between stressors and deficit accumulation were statistically mediated by biological age. Results : Survivors were an average of 58.8 years (range 30-83), were 21.1 (SD 14.6) months from diagnosis and 69.6% were pre-frail or frail. Between 55-78% had biological age greater than chronological age on one or more epigenetic clock and 88% had a faster pace of aging than expected based on chronological age. For each 1-point increase in life stress there was a 0.06 point increase in adjusted deficit accumulation (p<0.001) and life stress accounted for 67% of the explained variance in deficit accumulation. Biological age measured by GrimAge mediated 11.8% of the association between life stress and deficit accumulation (p<0.05) and there was similar but non-significant mediation by other epigenetic measures. Living in the most vs. least deprived area was also associated a large clinically meaningful increase in adjusted deficit accumulation (p=0.007), but discrimination had a smaller, non-significant effect. Conclusions : These findings demonstrate an association between experiencing social stressors and deficit accumulation frailty among Black breast cancer survivors and this association was partially driven by biological aging. Future studies are needed to identify aging pathways and possible modifiable factors that could be targeted by policy, behavioral and pharmacological interventions to reduce disparities and improve outcomes among cancer survivors.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. S. Mandelblatt, None.. J. R. Robinson, None.. X. Zhou, None.. J. Ahn, None.. S. Cole, None.. A. G. Schwartz, None.. B. Small, None.. K. Rentscher, None.. J. E. Carroll, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索