PO.PS01.10 · 人群科学

晚期纤维板层癌首次缓解期的维持治疗

Maintenance therapy in first remission for advanced fibrolamellar carcinoma

编号 874 展板 20 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 34 主讲 Laura Golian, BA
分会场 Survivorship Research
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Laura Golian1, Paul M. Kent2, Tom Stockwell1

1FibroFighters Foundation, Temecula, CA,2FibroFighters Foundation, River Forest, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:纤维板层癌(FLC)是一种罕见的原发性肝脏恶性肿瘤,主要影响青少年和青年,即使在完全肉眼下切除后复发率仍很高。传统上,单纯手术干预在很大程度上被认为是唯一的治愈策略。近年来的研究提示了系统治疗的作用,然而目前尚无共识指南。本研究评估手术后的无进展生存期(PFS)和总生存期(OS),同时将分期、治疗类型和切缘状态作为预后因素纳入。这是首个在真实世界FLC队列中评估手术切除后维持/辅助治疗相关结局的研究。 方法:我们在一个回顾性多中心数据集中分析了207例接受手术切除的FLC患者。辅助系统治疗被分类为“无”、“化疗”或“免疫治疗”。终点包括自手术日期计算的PFS和OS。采用Kaplan-Meier估计和log-rank检验评估未校正的差异。多变量Cox比例风险模型评估治疗类型、分期(局限=1期,区域=2期和3期,转移=4期)和切缘状态(R0 = 无疾病证据,R1 = 微观疾病,R2 = 残留大体疾病)的独立效应。 结果:共有200例患者可评估PFS(163例进展事件),199例可评估OS(75例死亡)。分期是结局最强的预测因素:相较于局限性疾病,转移性疾病的进展风险高8.6倍,死亡风险高47.7倍。切缘状态具有预后价值,R2切除带来显著增加的死亡风险(HR 2.87,95% CI 1.50-5.47)。在校正分期和切缘后,辅助系统治疗与延长的PFS独立相关。与无治疗相比,化疗(HR 0.44,95% CI 0.25-0.75)和免疫治疗(HR 0.41,95% CI 0.26-0.66)均使转移性患者获益。尽管化疗或免疫治疗在OS上无统计学显著性,但这很可能是其他因素的结果,提示需要进一步研究。 结论:在这一大型真实世界FLC患者手术队列中,术后化疗和免疫治疗与降低的进展风险独立相关,在转移性疾病中获益最为明显。OS主要由疾病分期和切缘状态驱动。这些发现提示术后系统治疗在晚期FLC患者中可能发挥作用,并强调了实现阴性手术切缘的关键重要性。需要前瞻性研究来验证这些结果并制定基于证据的指南。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Fibrolamellar carcinoma (FLC) is a rare primary liver malignancy affecting predominantly adolescents and young adults, with high recurrence rates even after complete macroscopic resection. Traditionally, surgical intervention alone was largely considered the only curative strategy. Research in recent years suggests the role of systemic therapy, however no consensus guidelines currently exist. This study evaluates progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS) after surgery, while incorporating stage, type of therapy, and resection margin status as prognostic factors. This is the first study to evaluate outcomes associated with maintenance/adjuvant therapy following surgical resection in a real-world FLC cohort. Methods: We analyzed 207 patients with FLC who underwent surgical resection in a retrospective multicenter dataset. Adjuvant systemic therapy was categorized as “none,” “chemotherapy,” or “immunotherapy.” Endpoints included PFS and OS calculated from date of surgery. Kaplan-Meier estimates and log-rank tests assessed unadjusted differences. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models evaluated the independent effects of therapy type, stage (Localized = Stage 1, Regional = Stages 2 & 3, Metastatic = Stage 4), and margin status (R0 = NED, R1 =Microscopic Disease, R2 = Gross Disease Remains). Results: A total of 200 patients were evaluable for PFS (163 progression events) and 199 for OS (75 deaths). Stage was the strongest predictor of outcome: metastatic disease was associated with an 8.6-fold higher hazard of progression and a 47.7-fold higher hazard of death relative to localized disease. Margin status was prognostic, with R2 resections conferring a significantly increased hazard of death (HR 2.87, 95% CI 1.50-5.47).Adjuvant systemic therapy was independently associated with prolonged PFS after adjusting for stage and margin. Compared with no therapy, chemotherapy (HR 0.44, 95% CI 0.25-0.75) and immunotherapy (HR 0.41, 95% CI 0.26-0.66) both benefitted metastatic patients. Although there was no statistical significance in OS for chemotherapy or immunotherapy, this is likely the result of other factors and suggests need for additional study. Conclusions: In this large real-world surgical cohort of FLC patients, postoperative chemotherapy and immunotherapy were independently associated with reduced risk of progression, with the most pronounced benefit in metastatic disease. OS was driven primarily by disease stage and margin status. These findings suggest a potential role for postoperative systemic therapy in patients with advanced FLC and highlight the critical importance of achieving negative surgical margins. Prospective studies are needed to validate these results and define evidence-based guidelines.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Golian, None.. P. M. Kent, None.. T. Stockwell, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索