PO.PS01.10 · 人群科学

利用脂质组学识别结直肠癌患者癌症相关疲劳的新型治疗靶点:ColoCare研究的结果

Identifying novel therapeutic targets for cancer-related fatigue in colorectal cancer patients using lipidomics: Results from the ColoCare Study

海报缩略图:利用脂质组学识别结直肠癌患者癌症相关疲劳的新型治疗靶点:ColoCare研究的结果
编号 875 展板 21 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 34 主讲 Nicole Lorona, BS;MS;PhD
分会场 Survivorship Research
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Nicole C. Loroña1, Mary C. Playdon2, James E. Cox3, Alan Maschek4, Xiaoyin Li5, Aasha I. Hoogland5, Maria F. Gomez5, Patricia A. Erickson2, Mmadili N. Ilozumba2, Victoria Damerell6, Ildiko Strehli2, Megan Mclaws2, Lyen C. Huang2, Paul Stewart2, Sheetal Hardikar2, Jennifer Ose7, Anita R. Peoples2, Brent Small8, David Shibata9, Doratha A. Byrd5, Adetunji T. Toriola10, Christopher I. Li11, Cornelia M. Ulrich2, Biljana Gigic6, Heather S. L. Jim5, Jane C. Figueiredo1

1Department of Medicine, Samuel Oschin Comprehensive Cancer Institute, Cedars-Sinai Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA,2Huntsman Cancer Institute, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,3Department of Biochemistry, University of Utah, Salt Lake City,, UT,4Department of Nutrition and Integrative Physiology and the Diabetes and Metabolism Research Center, University of Utah, Salt Lake City, UT,5Department of Health Outcomes and Behavior, H. Lee Moffitt Cancer Center and Research Institute, Tampa, FL,6Heidelberg University Hospital (UKHD), Heidelberg, Germany,7Department of Information and Communication, University of Applied Sciences and Arts, Hanover, Germany,8School of Nursing, The University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC,9University of Tennessee Health Science Center - Memphis, Memphis, TN,10Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis, Saint Louis, MO,11Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center, Seattle, WA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:癌症相关疲劳(CRF)是结直肠癌(CRC)患者最常报告的症状,治疗选择有限。与脂质代谢相关的代谢通路改变已被证明在非癌症疲劳相关疾病中发挥作用,并被假设影响CRF。本研究的目的是在一个CRC患者前瞻性队列中,研究血清脂质组学生物标志物,以识别CRF的纵向预测因素。 方法:ColoCare研究在美国六个中心和德国一个中心招募了18至89岁、新诊断的原发性I-IV期CRC男性和女性。CRF采用欧洲癌症研究与治疗组织生活质量问卷C30(EORTC QLQ-C30)的疲劳分量表,在T0(CRC手术/基线)、T1(术后6个月)、T2(12个月)和T3(24个月)进行测量。使用在每个时间点采集的血液,我们遵循全面的测量和质量控制方案进行了靶向脂质组学分析。对于本研究,纳入了I-III期疾病、且至少有一次CRF测量和脂质组学分析的参与者(N=863)。使用带有时间点交互项和受试者特异性随机截距的线性混合效应模型,我们评估了个体脂质与各时间点CRF之间的关联。我们使用Benjamini-Hochberg校正对错误发现率进行多重检验校正。模型还校正了年龄、性别、肿瘤部位、分期、体质指数、化疗、放疗和研究中心。我们在一个训练子集(n=176)上使用弹性网络回归,以识别T1(一线治疗接近完成时)能够预测T2疲劳的脂质。进一步验证预测模型和使用代谢通路分析的分析正在进行中。 结果:平均年龄为61.6岁(SD:12.7)。共识别出N=305种脂质。在线性混合效应模型中,T0或T1时无脂质与CRF相关。在T2和T3,经多重检验校正后,较高水平的神经酰胺(20种)、单己糖基神经酰胺(11种)、神经节苷脂(4种)、三己糖基神经酰胺(1种)和鞘磷脂(16种)与较低的CRF相关。预测建模识别出T1时三种鞘脂的较高水平与T2较低的CRF相关,以及T1时两种脂质(一种甘油二酯和一种神经酰胺)的较高水平与T2较高的CRF相关。 结论:特定的鞘脂,包括神经酰胺、单己糖基神经酰胺和鞘磷脂,与CRF呈负相关,提示具有保护作用。预测建模支持它们作为疲劳的可靶向生物标志物的潜力。这些发现凸显了脂质代谢作为理解和减轻癌症幸存者疲劳的一个有前景的靶点,值得开展外部验证和机制研究。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Cancer-related fatigue (CRF) is the most frequently reported symptom among patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), with limited therapeutic options. Alterations in metabolic pathways related to lipid metabolism have been shown to play a role in non-cancer fatigue-associated diseases, and are hypothesized to influence CRF. The purpose of the present study was to investigate serum lipidomic biomarkers to identify longitudinal predictors of CRF in a prospective cohort of patients with CRC. Methods: The ColoCare Study enrolled men and women ages 18 to 89 with newly diagnosed primary stage I-IV CRC at six U.S. sites and one German site. CRF was measured using the fatigue subscale of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer Quality of Life Questionnaire C30 (EORTC QLQ-C30) at T0 (CRC surgery/baseline), T1 (6 months post-surgery), T2 (12 months), and T3 (24 months). Using blood collected at each time point, we performed targeted lipidomics following comprehensive protocols for measurement and quality control. For the present study, participants with stage I-III disease and at least one measurement of CRF and lipidomic profiling (N=863) were included. Using linear mixed effects models with an interaction term with time point and subject-specific random intercepts, we assessed associations between individual lipids and CRF at each time point. We adjusted for multiple testing using the Benjamini-Hochberg correction for false-discovery rate. Models also adjusted for age, sex, tumor site, stage, body mass index, chemotherapy, radiation, and study site. We used elastic net regression on a training subset (n=176) to identify lipids at T1 (when first-line treatment was nearing completion) that were predictive of fatigue at T2. Further analyses validating prediction models and using metabolic pathway analyses are ongoing. Results: Mean age was 61.6 years (SD: 12.7). N=305 total lipids were identified. In linear mixed effects models, no lipids were associated with CRF at T0 or T1. At T2 and T3, higher levels of ceramides (20), monohexosylceramides (11), gangliosides (4), trihexosylceramides (1), and sphingomyelins (16) were associated with lower CRF after adjustment for multiple testing. Predictive modeling identified higher levels of three sphingolipids at T1 associated with lower CRF at T2 and higher levels of two lipids (one diglyceride and one ceramide) at T1 associated with higher CRF at T2. Conclusions: Specific sphingolipids, including ceramides, monohexosylceramides, and sphingomyelins, were inversely associated with CRF, suggesting a protective role. Predictive modeling supports their potential as targetable biomarkers of fatigue. These findings highlight lipid metabolism as a promising target for understanding and mitigating fatigue in cancer survivors, warranting external validation and mechanistic research.
利益披露 Disclosure
N. C. Loroña, None.. M. C. Playdon, None.. J. E. Cox, None.. A. Maschek, None.. X. Li, None.. A. I. Hoogland, None.. M. F. Gomez, None.. P. A. Erickson, None.. M. N. Ilozumba, None.. I. Strehli, None.. M. Mclaws, None.. L. C. Huang, None.. P. Stewart, None.. S. Hardikar, None.. J. Ose, None.. A. R. Peoples, None.. B. Small, None.. D. Shibata, None.. D. A. Byrd, None.. C. M. Ulrich, None.. B. Gigic, None.. H. S. L. Jim, None.. J. C. Figueiredo, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索