PO.CL01.20 · 临床研究

The expression of Napsin A by immunohistochemistry in colorectal adenocarcinomas: An observational study

编号 3835 展板 19 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 44 主讲 Zodwa Dlamini, PhD
分会场 Diagnostic Biomarkers 1
该海报暂无可访问的完整资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Cawekazi Cingo1, Rahaba Marima2, Tebogo Marutha2, Zodwa Dlamini2, Benny Mosoane1

1Department of Anatomical Pathology, University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa,2Pan African Cancer Research Institute (PACRI), University of Pretoria, Pretoria, South Africa

摘要 Abstract

Background: Distinguishing primary colorectal adenocarcinoma from metastatic pulmonary adenocarcinoma can be challenging in small biopsies, particularly when tumors are mucin-rich or poorly differentiated. Napsin A is widely used as a marker of pulmonary adenocarcinoma, yet scattered reports suggest it may sometimes be expressed in non-pulmonary primaries, including colorectal cancer. We set out to see how often napsin A is expressed in colorectal adenocarcinomas in our setting and to gauge how much of a diagnostic trap it may pose. Methods: We retrospectively reviewed 107 colorectal adenocarcinoma samples using formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded tissue blocks. Napsin A immunohistochemistry was performed using polyclonal and monoclonal antibodies. Three pathologists independently reviewed the slides; napsin A was considered positive when granular cytoplasmic staining was present in at least 1% of tumor cells. For each case, we recorded tumor differentiation, histological subtype, and CDX2 status. Results: Of the 107 tumors, 83 (77.6%) were moderately differentiated, 18 (16.8%) poorly differentiated, and 6 (5.6%) well differentiated. Histological subtypes included not otherwise specified (84.1%), mucinous (6.5%), signet ring (6.5%), and a small number of other variants. All cases were CDX2 positive, supporting a colorectal origin. Napsin A staining was observed in only 1/107 cases (0.9%) of poorly differentiated signet-ring adenocarcinoma, confined to the monoclonal antibody; none showed positivity with the polyclonal antibody. Conclusion: In this series, napsin A expression in colorectal adenocarcinoma was uncommon but not absent. Thus, a napsin A-positive metastatic adenocarcinoma could still represent a colorectal primary, especially in unusual histological subtypes. Our findings support cautious use of napsin A, always alongside morphology, a broader immunohistochemical panel, clinical data, and, where possible, molecular work-up. A larger multicenter dataset would help clarify generalizability and whether specific colorectal carcinoma subtypes are more prone to napsin A expression.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Cingo, None.. R. Marima, None.. T. Marutha, None.. Z. Dlamini, None.. B. Mosoane, None.

在会议检索中打开