PO.CT01.03 · 临床试验

Phase I study of ERY974 in patients with glypican-3 (GPC-3)-positive advanced solid tumors

海报缩略图:Phase I study of ERY974 in patients with glypican-3 (GPC-3)-positive advanced solid tumors
编号 CT197 展板 19 时间 4/21 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 50 主讲 Haruyasu Murakami, MD;PhD
分会场 Phase I Clinical Trials
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Haruyasu Murakami1, Hidetoshi Hayashi2, Kensei Yamagushi3, Kei Muro4, Taroh Satoh5, Tomohiro Nishina6, Eisuke Ueda7, Chika Ogami7, Hitomi Takeshita7, Hayato Takahashi7, Mikiko Nakamura7, Mihiro Toba7, Yasutoshi Kuboki8

1Shizuoka Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan,2Kindai University Hospital, Osakasayama City, Japan,3The Cancer Institute Hospital of JFCR, Koto City, Tokyo, Japan,4Aichi Cancer Center, Nagoya, Japan,5The University of Osaka Hospital, Osaka, Japan,6National Hospital Organization Shikoku Cancer Center, Shizuoka, Japan,7Chugai Pharmaceutical Co. Ltd., Tokyo, Japan,8National Cancer Center Hospital East, Chiba, Japan

摘要 Abstract

Background: ERY974, a bispecific antibody targeting GPC3 and CD3, redirects T cells to GPC3+ tumors to enhance immune responses. GPC3 is highly expressed in solid tumors and minimally present in normal tissue, making it a promising target. ERY102JP (Phase I) evaluated ERY974 in patients (pts) with GPC3+ advanced/recurrent solid tumors. A prior study showed limited tolerability at doses ≥0.81 µg/kg due to cytokine release syndrome (CRS), prompting investigation of prophylactic strategies. Methods: Eligible pts had tumors with ≥1% GPC3 expression. Pts got ERY974 (0.12-4.0 µg/kg; dose escalation design) by IV once weekly (QW). Tocilizumab (toc), an IL-6 receptor antagonist, was given before ERY974 (all cohorts) to mitigate CRS. Steroids (Cohorts 5-10) and step-up dosing (SUD; Cohorts 6-10) were added to reduce CRS and hepatotoxicity. Endpoints included safety, PK and anti-tumor activity (RECIST 1.1). Results 38 pts were enrolled across 10 cohorts. Grade ≥3 adverse events (AEs) occurred in 61% (23/38) of pts; ALT increased was seen in 37% (14/38) and AST increased in 24% (9/38). Dose-limiting toxicities occurred in 1 of 3 pts in the 0.80 µg/kg QW cohort, 1 of 6 pts in 0.80 µg/kg QW + Steroid cohort, and 3 of 4 pts in 0.5/1.2/4.0 µg/kg QW + Steroid cohort. The maximum tolerated dose was 2.7 µg/kg. No responses were seen (Table). ERY974 exposure increased dose-dependently; higher exposure, including 4.0 µg/kg, was achieved using SUD with steroids. CRS occurred in 55% (21/38) of pts, most often in cohorts receiving ERY974 ≥0.80 µg/kg. CRS incidence was 0% at 0.24 µg/kg with toc alone, and lower at initial ERY974 dose of 0.50 µg/kg with steroids (33%) vs without (67%). Higher ERY974 plasma concentrations were associated with increased risk of CRS (p=0.01) and grade ≥3 liver toxicity (p=0.05). Conclusions: Use of SUD, steroid premedication and toc enabled escalation to higher ERY974 doses (up to 2.7 µg/kg was tolerated) with manageable safety profiles. Toc likely mitigated CRS. Anti-tumor activity was limited. Table ERY974 dose (µg/kg) 0.12 (n=3) 0.24 (n=4) 0.50 (n=3) 0.80 (n=3) 0.80 + Steroid (n=6) 0.50/1.20 + Steroid a (n=3) 0.50/1.80 + Steroid a (n=4) 0.50/1.20/1.80 + Steroid a (n=4) 0.50/1.20/2.70 + Steroid a (n=4) 0.50/1.20/4.0 + Steroid a (n=4) Related AEs, n (%) b All grade 3 (100) 1 (25) 1 (33) 3 (100) 6 (100) 3 (100) 4 (100) 4 (100) 4 (100) 4 (100) Grade 3/4 c 0 1 (25) 0 2 (67) 3 (50) 2 (67) 4 (100) 3 (75) 4 (100) 4 (100) Serious 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) 2 (50) 1 (25) 1 (25) AEs leading to withdrawal from any treatment 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 1 (25) 0 0 Best overall response, n (%) CR/PR 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 0 SD 0 1 (25) 0 0 3 (50) 0 1 (25) 0 1 (25) 2 (50) jRCT2031200382. Clinical cutoff: Oct 18, 2024 AE, Adverse event; CR, complete response; PR, partial response; SD, stable disease; SUD, step-up dosing. a Weekly SUD regimen. b Multiple occurrences of the same AE in a person is counted once. c No grade 5 AEs were reported.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Murakami, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. H. Hayashi, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. K. Yamagushi, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. K. Muro, Chugai The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. T. Satoh, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. T. Nishina, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. E. Ueda, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. C. Ogami, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. H. Takeshita, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. H. Takahashi, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. M. Nakamura, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. M. Toba, Chugai Employment, Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai. Y. Kuboki, Chugai Other, The author received medical writing support from Nucleus Global paid for by Chugai.

在会议检索中打开