Ancestry-associated epigenetic differences in chronic lymphocytic leukemia

Background: CLL incidence differs by ancestry, with higher rates in individuals of European ancestry (EA) than African ancestry (AA). The contribution of epigenetic variation to these disparities remains unclear. We investigated chromatin accessibility, histone modifications, and gene expression in CLL patients of EA and AA to identify ancestry-associated epigenetic signatures. Methods: ATAC-seq was performed on blood clonal B cells from 15 AA and 51 EA patients; CUT&Tag profiling of six histone marks (H3K4me1, H3K4me3, H3K27ac, H3K9me3, H3K27me3, H3K36me3) was done in 8 AA and 12 EA cases; RNA-seq was generated for all samples. Ancestry was genetically confirmed. Differential regions were linked to genes using ENCODE and Hi-C datasets. Results: ATAC-seq revealed 4,955 regions with increased and 3,000 with decreased accessibility in AA vs EA (fold change >2, FDR ≤0.05). Regions with increased accessibility mapped to 2,313 genes; 599 were upregulated and enriched in TNF-alpha/NF-κB (p=1.40E-53) and apoptosis pathways (p=6.90E-11). Regions with decreased accessibility linked to 1,953 genes; 317 were downregulated, enriched in interferon-gamma response (p=1.04E-03) and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 signaling (p=6.41E-03). Histone profiling showed ancestry-specific changes across all marks. For H3K27ac (active enhancer), 68 genes with a decreased signal in AA were downregulated and enriched in interferon-gamma (p=1.55E-06) and IL-6/JAK/STAT3 (p=9.62E-05) pathways. Increased H3K27me3 (repressive histone modification) in AA affected 399 genes enriched in IL-6/JAK/STAT3 (p=8.13E-09) and interferon-gamma (p=2.48E-05) pathways. These findings suggest coordinated regulation by active and repressive chromatin states. Conclusions: Despite limited sample size, this study suggests differences between AA and EA ancestries may exist in epigenetic signatures in CLL, implicating chromatin accessibility and histone modifications in pathways relevant to tumor biology. These signatures may also contribute to the differences in CLL incidence by ancestry. Future studies with more patients and functional validation experiments are needed to clarify the role of these epigenetic differences in CLL pathogenesis.