PO.BCS01.01 · 生物信息与计算
通过空间转录组学表征化疗后卵巢癌的肿瘤-基质界面
Characterizing tumor-stroma interfaces in chemotherapy-treated ovarian cancer via spatial transcriptomics
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
肿瘤-基质界面(TSI)是一个关键的微环境区域,恶性细胞与非恶性细胞在此相互作用,并影响治疗耐药性和疾病进展。尽管其重要性突出,该区域在转录组层面仍未得到充分表征,将其组织结构与治疗结局联系起来的细胞学特征也尚未明确界定。这一空白限制了在患者应答背景下对空间微环境结构的转化学解读。为满足这一需求,我们开发了一个整合性框架,利用空间转录组学识别并表征TSI。该方法将spot水平的肿瘤检测与邻域分析相结合,后者可勾勒出环绕癌症spot的界面区域。我们将该框架应用于由Elena Denisenko等人生成的化疗后高级别浆液性卵巢癌数据集(n = 8;3例良好应答者、2例部分应答者和3例不良应答者),并在所有样本中界定了肿瘤区、TSI区和正常区。线性混合效应模型识别出,在TSI内,EIF4A3+癌症相关成纤维细胞、内皮细胞和肌成纤维细胞的比例在不同结局组之间存在显著差异。其中,肌成纤维细胞特异性地在不良应答者的TSI内升高,而在肿瘤区或正常区中未见升高,表明这是一种局部性而非全组织范围的变化。尽管T细胞比例在不同结局组之间无显著差异,但双变量Moran's I分析显示,在良好应答者中T细胞与肿瘤细胞之间存在强烈的空间共定位,而在不良应答者中这种空间耦合基本缺失。这些发现提示,免疫细胞的组织结构和丰度均可能有助于在良好结局中实现更有效的治疗后活性。通路分析进一步揭示了TSI内不同的功能程序。良好应答者表现出免疫激活和抗原呈递通路的富集,而不良应答者表现出细胞外基质重塑和基质信号传导的增加。回归分析证实,肌成纤维细胞比例与这些促耐药通路紧密相关,并与体液免疫应答活性呈负相关,从而将基质重塑与不良应答者中免疫通路参与度降低联系起来。总之,这些发现凸显了TSI的功能异质性及其在调节治疗应答中的潜在作用。通过整合肿瘤检测、界面绘制和通路水平分析,我们的框架提供了一种可扩展的策略,用于解析界面生物学,并将空间转录组学与治疗相关机制联系起来。该框架可能有助于发现具有空间信息的生物标志物,以预测卵巢癌及其他癌症的治疗结局。
查看英文原文 English abstract
The tumor-stroma interface (TSI) is a key microenvironmental region where malignant and non-malignant cells interact and influence therapeutic resistance and disease progression. Despite its importance, this area remains insufficiently characterized at the transcriptomic level, and the cellular features that connect its organization to treatment outcomes are not well defined. This gap limits the translational interpretation of spatial microenvironmental structure in the context of patient response. To address this need, we developed an integrative framework that identifies and characterizes the TSI using spatial transcriptomics. The approach combines spot-level tumor detection with a neighborhood analysis that delineates interface regions surrounding cancer spots. We applied this framework to a post-chemotherapy high-grade serous ovarian cancer dataset generated by Elena Denisenko et al. (n = 8; three good responders, two partial responders, and three poor responders) and defined tumor, TSI, and normal regions across all samples. Linear mixed-effects modeling identified significantly different proportions of EIF4A3+ cancer associated fibroblasts, endothelial cells, and myofibroblasts between outcome groups within the TSI. Among them, myofibroblasts were elevated specifically within the TSI of poor responders, but not in tumor or normal regions, indicating a localized rather than tissue-wide shift. Although T-cell proportions were not significantly different between outcome groups, bivariate Moran's I analysis showed strong spatial co-localization between T cells and tumor cells in good responders, whereas this spatial coupling was largely absent in poor responders. These findings suggest that both immune cell organization and abundance may contribute to more effective post-treatment activity in favorable outcomes. Pathway analysis further revealed distinct functional programs within the TSI. Good responders showed enrichment of immune activation and antigen-presentation pathways, whereas poor responders displayed increased extracellular matrix remodeling and stromal signaling. Regression analysis confirmed that myofibroblast proportion was tightly linked to these pro-resistance pathways and negatively correlated with humoral immune response activity, connecting stromal remodeling with reduced immune pathway engagement in poor responders. Collectively, these findings highlight the functional heterogeneity of the TSI and its potential role in modulating treatment response. By integrating tumor detection, interface mapping, and pathway-level analysis, our framework offers a scalable strategy to dissect interface biology and bridge spatial transcriptomics with treatment-related mechanisms. This framework may enable the discovery of spatially informed biomarkers for predicting therapeutic outcomes in ovarian cancer and beyond.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. Chen, None..
T. M. Yasaka, None..
T. Hsiao, None..
T. Ko, None..
Y. Chiu, None.