PO.TB09.03 · 肿瘤生物学

基于甲基化的肿瘤分数动态的分层混合效应三次样条建模,用于免疫治疗患者治疗反应和结局的泛癌种评估

Hierarchical mixed effects cubic spline modeling of methylation-based tumor fraction dynamics for pan-cancer assessment of treatment response and outcomes in immunotherapy patients

编号 690 展板 6 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 28 主讲 Christopher Pretz
分会场 Methods to Measure Tumor Evolution and Heterogeneity
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Christopher Pretz1, Amar Das1, Carin Espenschied2, Sara Wienke3, Samantha I. Liang4, Christopher Cabanski4

1Real World Evidence, Guardant Health Laboratory, Redwood City, CA,2Guardant Health, Spokane, WA,3Guardant Health, Charleston, SC,4Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy, San Francisco, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:基于甲基化的肿瘤分数(TF)动态是一种有前景的疾病监测替代标志物,但其演化在不同患者和癌症类型之间差异很大。为刻画这些模式,我们开发了一个分层混合效应三次样条模型,可在考虑患者层面异质性和临床协变量的同时捕捉非线性的纵向TF趋势。与传统方法相比,该框架支持多种癌症类型、基线因素,并生成按结局分层的轨迹(如疾病进展和生存)。通过实现按结局的轨迹分叉,该模型同时反映治疗反应和预后,增进了我们对TF动态如何与不同癌症类型间治疗疗效相关联的理解。 方法:我们分析了RADIOHEAD研究中的519例患者,该研究由1,070例接受标准治疗免疫检查点抑制剂(ICI)方案、既往未接受免疫治疗的患者组成。纳入患者在基线之后有≥2份血浆样本。TF使用Guardant Reveal测定,这是一种经临床验证的基于甲基化的检测方法。使用赤池信息准则进行模型选择,比较线性、非线性和样条模型;带五个节点的自然三次样条对数据拟合最佳。协变量包括年龄、吸烟状态、分期(III期对IV期)和性别。分析的癌症类型为肺癌、膀胱癌、黑色素瘤、肾细胞癌和头颈癌。二元结局为15个月生存(存活/死亡)和疾病进展(是/否)。 结果:由于样条系数不可解释,研究结果以图形方式呈现。在校正协变量后,TF轨迹超出95%置信带并显示出按癌症类型和结局区分的不同模式。开发了一个交互式R Shiny应用程序来展示这些轨迹,并附有提供TF瞬时变化率的速度图以辅助解读。 结论:本分析提供了一个框架,用于刻画免疫治疗期间TF的演化以及这些动态如何区分跨癌种的临床结局。按结局分层的轨迹和TF速度可能有助于识别治疗反应的早期指标,支持更有依据的治疗决策。此外,由于TF动态因疾病适应证而异,未来研究可将TF动态与基因组学及其他临床指标整合,以更好地理解反应机制、耐药因素以及可能导致对ICI异质性反应的其他生物学驱动因素。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Methylation-based tumor fraction (TF) dynamics are a promising surrogate marker for monitoring disease, but their evolution varies widely across patients and cancer types. To characterize these patterns, we developed a hierarchical mixed-effects cubic spline model that captures non-linear longitudinal TF trends while accounting for patient-level heterogeneity and clinical covariates. Compared with traditional approaches, this framework supports multiple cancer types, baseline factors, and generates outcome-stratified trajectories (e.g., disease progression and survival). By enabling trajectory bifurcation by outcome, the model simultaneously reflects treatment response and prognosis, improving our understanding of how TF dynamics relate to therapeutic efficacy across diverse cancer types. Methods: We analyzed 519 patients from the RADIOHEAD study consisting of 1,070 immunotherapy-naive patients receiving standard-of-care immune checkpoint inhibitor (ICI) regimens. Included patients had ≥2 plasma samples beyond baseline. TF was measured using Guardant Reveal, a clinically validated methylation-based assay. Model selection using Akaike information criterion compared linear, non-linear, and spline models; a natural cubic spline with five knots best fit the data. Covariates included age, smoking status, stage (III vs IV), and gender. Cancer types analyzed were lung, bladder, melanoma, renal cell carcinoma, and head and neck carcinoma. Binary outcomes were 15-month survival (alive/deceased) and disease progression (yes/no). Results: Because spline coefficients are not interpretable, findings were presented graphically. After adjusting for covariates, TF trajectories diverged beyond 95% confidence bands and exhibited distinct patterns by cancer type and outcome. An interactive R Shiny application was developed to display these trajectories, along with velocity plots providing the instantaneous rate of TF change to aid interpretation. Conclusions: This analysis provides a framework for characterizing TF evolution during immunotherapy and how these dynamics differentiate clinical outcomes across cancer types. Outcome-stratified trajectories and TF velocity may help identify early indicators of treatment response, supporting more informed therapeutic decisions. Additionally, since TF dynamics vary by disease indication, future studies could integrate TF dynamics with genomic and other clinical indicators to better understand response mechanisms, resistance factors, and other biological drivers that may underly a heterogeneous response to ICIs.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Pretz, Guardant Health Employment. A. Das, Guardant Health Employment. C. Espenschied, Guardant Health Employment. S. Wienke, Guardant Health Employment. S. I. Liang, Parker Institute for Cancer Immunotherapy Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索