PO.TB10.12 · 肿瘤生物学

物理驱动的染色体不稳定性促使巨噬细胞协同攻击

Physically driven chromosome instabilities spur macrophages to attack cooperatively

海报缩略图:物理驱动的染色体不稳定性促使巨噬细胞协同攻击
编号 766 展板 11 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 31 主讲 Dennis Discher, PhD
分会场 Physicochemical Modulation of Cancer Ecosystems: Mechanical Forces, Hypoxia, and Acidosis
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Dennis Discher, Markus Sprenger, Joanna Georgiou, Tristan Marchena, Jude Khatib

University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
细胞外基质常在实体瘤内部及周围积聚,而此类肿瘤也演化出多样的突变,驱动癌症、干扰治疗并调控免疫相互作用。在各种癌症类型中,我们观察到染色体数目改变与collagen-I水平相关,且我们的实验显示,球体周围坚硬的3D基质可诱导罕见的可遗传染色体丢失。染色体报告基因(ChReporters)揭示,丢失可发生在低至约0.1%的细胞中,其在球体中的机制基于有丝分裂纺锤体的扭曲——该扭曲随着候选抑癌因子myosin-II的敲低而增加。染色体错误分离进入微核,微核随基质硬度增加而增多,尽管细胞分裂受到抑制。在2D中增加微核并依赖未受扰动纺锤体的药物,在纺锤体受扰动的3D中则无效。体内被坚硬collagen包裹的肿瘤同样表现出更多但更多变的染色体丢失,且生长比2D培养更慢。ChReporter阴性克隆的高方差进一步说明,随着3D基质硬度增加以及依据Luria-Delbruck理论的可遗传突变,异质性增强。我们建立了增殖细胞中染色体数目演化的物理学习模型,并拟合了关键的统计学趋势。温度是另一种物理应激源——因为实体瘤往往偏温热——我们显示它具有与基质物理特性相似的结果。加热现也是多种疗法的组成部分,免疫工程方法亦然。我们利用常浸润实体瘤的巨噬细胞,在实体瘤中有时可见巨噬细胞簇,并与患者更长的生存期相关。然而,成簇机制、对上述应激源的反应以及对吞噬作用等关键功能的影响仍不清楚。在使黏聚性肿瘤内癌细胞吞噬作用最大化的条件下,我们揭示了有利于动态成簇的通路,并发现了肿瘤侵入性伪足的共定位,我们将其命名为“侵入伪足(intrudopodia)”。M1巨噬细胞在暴露于干扰素和T细胞来源的细胞因子后有利于成簇形成。M1巨噬细胞上调特定的细胞间黏附受体,但抑制肌动球蛋白收缩力,这两条通路共同促进成簇形成并释放伪足。肿瘤球体中的巨噬细胞邻居确实在癌细胞连接之间共同延伸侵入伪足——至少在通过检查点破坏及其他策略使吞噬条件最大化时如此。来自邻居的侵入伪足有助于将癌细胞分离并个体化,以便快速吞噬。因此,协同吞噬克服了实体瘤的黏聚性——这或可解释为何巨噬细胞成簇因子ITGAL与患者生存相关。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Extracellular matrix often accumulates in and around solid tumors, and such tumors also evolve diverse mutations that drive cancers, confound therapies, and modulate immune interactions. Across cancer types, we observe chromosome number changes associate with collagen-I levels, and our experiments show rare heritable chromosome losses are induced by a stiff 3D matrix around spheroids. Chromosome reporters (ChReporters) reveal losses in as few as ~0.1% of cells, with a mechanism in spheroids based on distortion of mitotic spindles - which increases with knockdown of the candidate tumor suppressor myosin-II. Chromosomes mis-segregate into micronuclei that increase with matrix stiffness despite suppressed cell division. Drugs that increase micronuclei in 2D and that rely on an unperturbed spindle show no effect in 3D where the spindle is perturbed. Tumors in vivo that are surrounded by stiff collagen likewise show more but varied chromosome loss and slower growth than 2D cultures. High variance of ChReporter-negative colonies further illustrate increased heterogeneity with 3D matrix stiffness and heritable mutations per Luria-Delbruck theory. Physical learning models of evolving chromosome numbers in proliferating cells are developed and fit key statistical trends.Temperature is another physical stressor - as solid tumors tend to be warm - and we show it has similar outcomes as matrix physical properties. Heating is also now part of various therapies as are immune-engineering approaches. We take advantage of Macrophages that often pervade solid tumors where clusters of macrophages are sometimes seen and associate with longer survival of patients. However, clustering mechanisms, responses to stressor above, and impacts on key functions such as phagocytosis remain obscure. Under conditions that maximize cancer cell phagocytosis within cohesive tumors, we uncover pathways that favor dynamic clusters and find a colocalization of tumor-intrusive pseudopodia which we term “intrudopodia.” Cluster formation is favored by M1 macrophages after exposure to interferons and T cell-derived cytokines. M1 macrophages upregulate specific cell-cell adhesion receptors but suppress actomyosin contractility, with both pathways contributing to cluster formation and unleashing pseudopodia. Macrophage neighbors in tumor spheroids indeed coextend intrudopodia between cancer cell junctions-at least when phagocytosis conditions are maximized by checkpoint disruption and other strategies. Intrudopodia from neighbors help detach and individualize cancer cells for rapid engulfment. Cooperative phagocytosis thus overcomes solid tumor cohesion-and might explain why the macrophage clustering factor ITGAL associates with patient survival.
利益披露 Disclosure
D. Discher, None.. J. Georgiou, None.. T. Marchena, None.. J. Khatib, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索