LBPO.BCS01 · 生物信息与计算 · Late-Breaking
通过进化选择压力预测新抗原免疫原性
Predicting neoantigen immunogenicity through evolutionary selection pressure
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:准确预测新抗原免疫原性仍是癌症免疫治疗和个性化疫苗设计中的一项关键挑战。当前的计算方法预测能力有限,现有方法在识别真正具有免疫原性的新抗原方面表现平平。我们开发了NEMo(Neoantigen Elimination Model,新抗原清除模型),这是一种进化机器学习模型,通过学习那些使新抗原对免疫系统尤为可见、并在免疫检查点阻断(ICB)治疗后于免疫选择压力下被从肿瘤中清除的突变特征,来预测新抗原免疫原性。
实验方法:NEMo在来自接受免疫检查点阻断治疗患者的25,000多个突变(附带纵向时间点数据)上进行训练。该模型利用免疫系统施加的选择压力——即免疫原性新抗原在治疗后优先从肿瘤中脱落——作为免疫原性的有力替代指标。我们在四个独立数据集中验证了NEMo的性能:两个评估一般新抗原免疫原性,两个来自癌症疫苗临床试验。
结果:在一个74例胃癌患者队列中,NEMo区分免疫原性与非免疫原性新抗原的曲线下面积(AUC)值,对CD8+ T细胞反应性为0.855,对CD4+ T细胞反应性为0.73(P值分别为2e-17和4e-10)。在涉及25个团队的TESLA联盟全球竞赛中,NEMo以74%的准确率大幅超越竞争方法,而次优竞争者为42%(平均15%)。在Ott等人的黑色素瘤疫苗试验(n=8例患者)中,NEMo正确识别出免疫原性新抗原,CD8+反应的AUC为0.87,CD4+反应为0.7。在Cafri等人的结直肠癌和胃癌患者疫苗试验(n=4)中观察到类似性能,CD8+和CD4+反应的AUC均为0.7。值得注意的是,NEMo的优越性能可归因于对HLA呈递动力学的增强建模。在Ott数据集中,最初被试验设计者选为高免疫原性候选的七个新抗原在计算机模拟中被HLA良好呈递,但由于肿瘤进化介导的特定HLA等位基因缺失,其免疫原性潜力下降(P<0.001)。未受这些缺失影响的新抗原表现出显著更高的免疫原性(P<0.001)。
结论:NEMo代表了计算新抗原免疫原性预测领域近期的一项突破性进展,其利用进化选择压力作为具有生物学根基的训练信号,不受体内免疫系统扭曲因素的影响。通过准确建模HLA呈递并纳入肿瘤进化动力学,NEMo为癌症疫苗的合理设计和免疫治疗的患者分层提供了强有力的工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Accurate prediction of neoantigen immunogenicity remains a critical challenge in cancer immunotherapy and personalized vaccine design. Current computational approaches show limited predictive power, with existing methods achieving modest performance in identifying truly immunogenic neoantigens. We developed NEMo (Neoantigen Elimination Model), an evolutionary machine learning model that predicts neoantigen immunogenicity by learning mutation characteristics that render neoantigens particularly visible to the immune system and are subsequently eliminated from tumors under immune selective pressure following immune checkpoint blockade (ICB) treatment.
Experimental Procedures: NEMo was trained on over 25,000 mutations with longitudinal time-point data from patients treated with immune checkpoint blockade. The model leverages the selective pressure exerted by the immune system-whereby immunogenic neoantigens are preferentially shed from tumors after treatment-as a potent proxy for immunogenicity. We validated NEMo's performance across four independent datasets: two assessing general neoantigen immunogenicity and two from cancer vaccine clinical trials.
Results: In a cohort of 74 gastric cancer patients, NEMo distinguished immunogenic from non-immunogenic neoantigens with area under the curve (AUC) values of 0.855 for CD8+ T cell reactivity and 0.73 for CD4+ T cell reactivity (P=2e-17 and P=4e-10, respectively). In the TESLA consortium global competition involving 25 teams, NEMo substantially outperformed competing methods with 74% accuracy compared to 42% for the next best competitor (average 15%). In the Ott et al. melanoma vaccine trial (n=8 patients), NEMo correctly identified immunogenic neoantigens with AUCs of 0.87 for CD8+ and 0.7 for CD4+ responses. Similar performance was observed in the Cafri et al. vaccine trial of colorectal and gastric cancer patients (n=4), with AUCs of 0.7 for both CD8+ and CD4+ responses. Notably, NEMo's superior performance can be attributed to enhanced modeling of HLA presentation dynamics. In the Ott dataset, seven neoantigens originally selected as highly immunogenic candidates by trial designers were well-presented by HLA in silico but showed reduced immunogenic potential due to tumor evolution-mediated deletion of specific HLA alleles (P<0.001). Neoantigens unaffected by these deletions demonstrated significantly higher immunogenicity (P<0.001).
Conclusions: NEMo represents a recent and groundbreaking advancement in computational neoantigen immunogenicity prediction, leveraging evolutionary selection pressure as a biologically grounded training signal, free from in-vivo distortions to the immune system. By accurately modeling HLA presentation and incorporating tumor evolution dynamics, NEMo provides a powerful tool for rational design of cancer vaccines and patient stratification for immunotherapy.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Sears, None..
K. Lee, None..
M. Zanetti, None..
H. Carter, None.