LBPO.CL02 · 临床研究 · Late-Breaking
一种基于DNA甲基化的整合式多维风险因素模型用于预测乳腺癌进展
An integrated DNA methylation-based and multidimensional risk factor model for predicting breast cancer progression
该海报暂无可下载的资料
AACR 官方页面
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景
乳腺癌仍是癌症相关死亡的主要原因,约20-30%的早期疾病患者会发展为转移性复发。传统的血清肿瘤标志物,如CA15-3和CEA,在监测疾病进展方面敏感性有限。循环DNA甲基化生物标志物为动态评估肿瘤负荷提供了一种有前景的方法。本研究旨在开发一种基于血液的整合预测模型,将癌症特异性甲基化的GCM2和TMEM240与肿瘤特征及多维患者相关风险因素相结合,以改善乳腺癌进展监测。
方法
在这项前瞻性队列研究中,纳入了台湾的200例乳腺癌患者,并在诊断后随访6至65个月,其中87.7%的患者随访超过三年。在入组时系统收集了基线的人口统计学、人体测量学、生育、激素、社会心理、饮食和生活方式变量。每三个月采集血样,对GCM2和TMEM240进行定量甲基化分析,同时进行传统肿瘤标志物评估。以无病生存期作为主要结局。构建了一个整合甲基化生物标志物、肿瘤分期、乳腺癌亚型、激素受体状态、肿瘤标志物和患者相关风险因素的多变量回归模型,以估计个体乳腺癌进展风险。
结果
该整合式多变量模型表明,循环DNA甲基化生物标志物和患者相关因素均独立地并共同地促成乳腺癌进展风险。与风险增加相关的因素包括三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)、升高的体质指数(BMI)以及其他恶性肿瘤的一级家族史。生育和内源性激素因素,包括活产次数和纯母乳喂养≥6个月,与不同的风险特征相关。此外,缺乏有效改善策略的持续性睡眠质量不佳、社会心理压力,以及以频繁摄入甜食或高度加工食品为特征的饮食模式,被确定为促成风险的因素。纳入甲基化的GCM2和TMEM240显著改善了进展模型的预测性能,超越了单独使用传统肿瘤标志物。
结论
本研究证明,将循环DNA甲基化生物标志物(GCM2和TMEM240)与肿瘤特征及多维患者相关风险因素相结合,能够实现对乳腺癌进展风险的全面而动态的评估。重要的是,被多变量回归模型识别为疾病进展较高风险的患者,可能受益于强化监测,包括每三个月一次的GCM2和TMEM240血液甲基化连续监测,以促进疾病进展的更早检测和更及时的临床干预。这一整合方法在治疗反应和肿瘤负荷的精准监测方面显示出强大的临床应用潜力,支持进一步验证并转化为临床实践。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background
Breast cancer remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality, with approximately 20-30% of patients with early-stage disease developing metastatic recurrence. Conventional serum tumor markers, such as CA15-3 and CEA, have limited sensitivity for monitoring disease progression. Circulating DNA methylation biomarkers offer a promising approach for dynamic assessment of tumor burden. This study aimed to develop an integrated blood-based prediction model combining cancer specific methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 with tumor characteristics and multidimensional patient-related risk factors to improve breast cancer progression monitoring.
Methods
In this prospective cohort study, 200 breast cancer patients in Taiwan were enrolled and followed for 6 to 65 months after diagnosis, with 87.7% of patients followed for more than three years. Baseline demographic, anthropometric, reproductive, hormonal, psychosocial, dietary, and lifestyle variables were systematically collected at enrollment. Blood samples were obtained every three months for quantitative methylation analysis of GCM2 and TMEM240 , together with conventional tumor marker assessments. Disease-free survival was used as the primary outcome. A multivariable regression model integrating methylation biomarkers, tumor stage, breast cancer subtype, hormone receptor status, tumor markers, and patient-related risk factors was constructed to estimate individual breast cancer progression risk.
Results
The integrated multivariable model demonstrated that both circulating DNA methylation biomarkers and patient-related factors independently and collectively contributed to breast cancer progression risk. Factors associated with increased risk included triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), elevated body mass index (BMI), and a first-degree family history of other malignancies. Reproductive and endogenous hormonal factors, including number of live births and exclusive breastfeeding for ≥ 6 months, were associated with differential risk profiles. In addition, persistent poor sleep quality without effective improvement strategies, psychosocial stress, and dietary patterns characterized by frequent intake of sweets or highly processed foods were identified as contributory risk factors. Incorporation of methylated GCM2 and TMEM240 significantly improved the predictive performance of the progression model beyond conventional tumor markers alone.
Conclusions
This study demonstrates that combining circulating DNA methylation biomarkers ( GCM2 and TMEM240 ) with tumor characteristics and multidimensional patient-related risk factors enables a comprehensive and dynamic assessment of breast cancer progression risk. Importantly, patients identified as higher risk for disease progression by the multivariable regression model may benefit from intensified surveillance, including serial blood-based methylation monitoring of GCM2 and TMEM240 at three-month intervals, to facilitate earlier detection of disease progression and more timely clinical intervention. This integrated approach shows strong potential for clinical utility in precision monitoring of treatment response and tumor burden, supporting further validation and translation into clinical practice.
利益披露 Disclosure
C. Hung,
EG BioMed Co. Ltd. Stock.
R. Lin,
EG BioMed US Inc. Employment, Stock.