LBPO.CL02 · 临床研究 · Late-Breaking

Driver-specific MRD strategy associated with pathological response and predicted recurrence in stage III driver-mutant NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant treatment

海报缩略图:Driver-specific MRD strategy associated with pathological response and predicted recurrence in stage III driver-mutant NSCLC receiving neoadjuvant treatment
编号 LB120 展板 7 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 52 主讲 Xing Li, MS
分会场 Late-Breaking Research: Clinical Research 2
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Jian Hu1, Xiao Teng1, Ziming Li2, Yu Qi3, Feng Li3, Qixun Chen4, Changbin Zhu5, Xing Li5, Shun Lu2

1Thoracic Surgery, The First Affiliated Hospital of Medical School of Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China,2Shanghai Lung Cancer Center, ShanghaiChest Hospital, Shanghai Jiao Tong University School of Medicine, Shanghai, China,3Department of Thoracic Surgery, TheFirst Affiliated Hospital of Zhengzhou University, Zhengzhou, China,4Department of Thoracic Surgery, Cancer Hospital of the University of Chinese Academy of Sciences/ Zhejiang Cancer Hospital, Hangzhou, China,5Amoy Diagnostics Co., Ltd., Xiamen, China

摘要 Abstract

Background: Postoperative driver gene-specific circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) monitoring stratifies recurrence risk in resectable stage III driver-mutant NSCLC (NCT06443684). Whether driver-specific ctDNA MRD can evaluate neoadjuvant response and predict recurrence in stage III driver-mutant NSCLC remains to be defined. Methods: From 2022 to 2025, 203 resectable stage III NSCLC patients with tissue-confirmed driver mutations were prospectively enrolled at 14 centers in China (NCT06443684). Peripheral blood was collected before neoadjuvant therapy, preoperatively, 3 days and 1 month after surgery, and every 3 months until investigator-confirmed recurrence. ctDNA was analyzed using a 10-gene driver panel (LC10). This analysis focused on peri-neoadjuvant ctDNA dynamics and clinical outcomes among 82 patients who received neoadjuvant therapy followed by surgery. Results: Among the 82 neoadjuvant-treated patients, regimens included chemo-immunotherapy (57.3%), TKI (3 rd -EGFR TKI/2 nd or 3 rd -ALK TKI, 39.0%), and chemotherapy alone (3.7%). Post-neoadjuvant ctDNA positivity was associated with a significantly lower MPR rate versus ctDNA negativity (0% vs 42.3%, p=0.004), whereas baseline ctDNA status was not associated with MPR (16.7% vs 21.2%). Post-neoadjuvant ctDNA molecular residual level (hGE/mL) positively correlated with residual viable tumor cells (R=0.332, p=0.009). Post-neoadjuvant ctDNA-positive patients had significantly shorter event-free survival (median EFS 11.4 vs 23.8 months; HR=8.82; p=0.009). For non-MPR patients, post-neoadjuvant negative ctDNA status also indicated favorable prognosis (median EFS 23.8 vs 4.7 months; HR=5.80; p=0.054). Compared with other regimens, neoadjuvant TKI was associated with a lower post-treatment ctDNA residual rate (0% vs 15.3%; p=0.05). Patients with persistent ctDNA positivity (baseline→post-neoadjuvant) had the shortest EFS (median 4.7 months), followed by negative→positive (23.8 months), while positive to negative and persistent negative ctDNA indicated disease free status(log-rank p<0.001). Conclusions: A driver-specific ctDNA MRD strategy provides a practical tool for neoadjuvant efficacy assessment and postoperative recurrence risk stratification for stage III driver-mutant NSCLC patients.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Hu, None.. X. Teng, None.. Z. Li, None.. Y. Qi, None.. F. Li, None.. Q. Chen, None.. C. Zhu, None.. X. Li, None.. S. Lu, None.

在会议检索中打开