LBPO.CL02 · 临床研究 · Late-Breaking
前列腺癌幸存者及其伴侣相互影响彼此饮食的共同过程:一项定性描述性研究
The communal process through which prostate cancer survivors and their partners affect each other's diets: A qualitative descriptive study
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:本定性描述性研究探讨了前列腺癌(PCa)幸存者及其伴侣借以塑造彼此饮食的共同过程(即二元沟通与协作行动)。
方法:通过诊所和Research For Me(一个活跃临床研究的在线登记平台)招募了PCa幸存者及其伴侣二元组(n=18对二元组,36名个体)。对每对二元组进行了一次50分钟的二元访谈和两次可选的5分钟个体访谈。访谈提纲采用共同应对模型(Communal Coping Model)制定。访谈进行了录音、逐字转录并去标识化。由两名研究者独立对每份转录稿进行主题分析。
结果:多数入组夫妇为已婚(n=17)和异性恋(n=17)。15名幸存者在5年内被诊断为PCa,13名接受了至少一种类型的治疗。共浮现出八个主题;其中六个属于共同应对模型的沟通与行动构念。沟通方面的主题包括:(1)已建立的沟通模式和(2)夫妇关于PCa及饮食观念的对话。已建立有效沟通模式的夫妇更有能力就饮食与健康展开对话,从而促进健康的饮食改变。行动方面的主题包括:(1)信息寻求、(2)伴侣支持、(3)烹饪与购物,以及(4)维持改变的策略。夫妇在这些行动上或协作、或委托给一方、或各自单独行动。未开展协作行动的夫妇报告在饮食选择上冲突更多,管理健康饮食的负担更重。此外还浮现出两个主题:(1)PCa所致的饮食改变和(2)饮食改变时机的差异。
结论:通过有效沟通,夫妇可以就健康饮食与PCa达成一致的认知,从而促进共同的饮食改变。协作行动(如共同烹饪与购物)而非各自的努力,能够减轻饮食改变的负担。总体而言,本研究凸显了开展促进沟通与协作行动的干预措施的必要性,以帮助夫妇在整个PCa病程中采纳并维持健康饮食。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: This qualitative descriptive study explored the communal processes (i.e., dyadic communication and collaborative action) through which prostate cancer (PCa) survivors and their partners shaped each other's diets.
Methods: Dyads of PCa survivors and their partners (n=18 dyads, 36 individuals) were recruited through clinics and Research For Me, an online registry of active clinical studies. A 50-minute dyadic interview and two optional 5-minute individual interviews were conducted with each dyad. Interview guides were developed using the Communal Coping Model. Interviews were audio recorded, transcribed verbatim, and de-identified. Thematic analysis was applied to each transcript by two investigators independently.
Results: Most enrolled couples were married (n=17) and heterosexual (n=17). Fifteen survivors were diagnosed with PCa within 5 years, and thirteen received at least one type of treatment. Eight themes emerged; six fell within the communication and action constructs of the Communal Coping Model. Themes for communication included: (1) established communication patterns and (2) couple dialogues about PCa and diet beliefs. Couples who have established effective communication patterns are better equipped to engage in dialogues about diet and health, which facilitates healthy dietary changes. Themes for action included: (1) information seeking, (2) partner support, (3) cooking and shopping, and (4) strategies for sustaining changes. Couples collaborated on these actions, delegated them to one partner, or acted individually. Couples who did not engage in collaborative actions reported greater conflict over dietary choices and a heavier burden of managing healthy diets. Two additional themes emerged: (1) PCa-induced dietary changes and (2) variations in dietary change timing.
Conclusions: Through effective communication, couples can align their awareness of healthy diets and PCa, which facilitates joint dietary changes. Collaborative actions (e.g., shared cooking and shopping), rather than individual efforts, ease the burden of dietary changes. Overall, this study highlights the need for interventions that foster communication and collaborative action to help couples adopt and maintain healthy diets throughout the PCa trajectory.
利益披露 Disclosure
J. Xu, None..
L. H. Ranzinger, None..
S. Sperry, None..
H. Tan, None..
L. Song, None..
J. Leeman, None..
B. Zou, None..
R. Hirschey, None.