PO.BCS01.02 · 生物信息与计算
利用游离DNA甲基化进行融合表观分型可改善非小细胞肺癌中可干预的ALK融合的检测
Fusion epigenotyping using cell‑free DNA methylation improves detection of actionable ALK fusions in non-small cell lung cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:由于读段片段较短,采用二代测序进行融合检测颇具挑战,短片段可能无法完全解析复杂的基因组重排,也无法定位位于靶向捕获区域之外的内含子断点。肿瘤甲基化模式反映了癌细胞的功能状态,且不依赖于断点覆盖,受测序片段长度的影响较小,可提供一个稳健的正交信号以增强基于基因组的融合识别。我们开发了一种基于游离DNA(cfDNA)甲基化的融合表观分型方法,以挽回基于基因组方法所漏检的融合,重点关注非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中的ALK融合检测,从而为ALK抑制剂治疗的选择提供依据。
方法:使用Guardant360 Liquid检测(Guardant Health,加利福尼亚州帕洛阿尔托)处理NSCLC样本。将横跨数千个调控区域的全基因组cfDNA甲基化谱与基因组分子支持相结合,训练一个二元分类器,以区分EML4-ALK融合阳性与融合阴性的NSCLC。基于175例EML4-ALK融合阳性样本和175例融合阴性样本训练了一个逻辑回归模型。通过将来自TCGA数据的组织EML4-ALK相关差异甲基化区域(DMR,p<0.05)与来自Guardant360 Liquid cfDNA样本的融合DMR进行比较,评估与NSCLC组织样本的一致性。为确保临床级别的特异性,在超过11,000例基因组融合阴性的NSCLC样本上校准了以>99%特异性为目标的决策阈值。在102例独立阳性病例(63例经基因组检出,39例经基因组漏检)上评估模型性能,这些病例的表观基因组肿瘤分数>0.1%,样本来自(a)具有ALK抑制剂耐药突变者、(b)既往接受过ALK抑制剂治疗者,或(c)具有基因组融合检出纵向病史者。融合挽回率定义为经基因组漏检的融合中被表观分型分类器挽回的比例。
结果:TCGA NSCLC组织与Guardant360 Liquid cfDNA样本之间的甲基化一致性分析显示出显著重叠,64%(1384/2168)的组织EML4-ALK相关差异甲基化区域(DMR,p<0.05)在cfDNA中同样显著。在测试队列中,表观分型分类器达到74%的灵敏度,检出了基因组识别器所识别的100%的融合。在经基因组漏检的病例中,该分类器挽回了31%(12/39)的融合。
结论:一种基于cfDNA甲基化的融合表观分型方法提供了一个高特异性的正交信号,可增强基因组融合检测,挽回了基因组方法所漏检的相当一部分EML4-ALK融合。在临床上,可考虑对被挽回的ALK融合患者施以有效且低毒性的靶向ALK抑制剂治疗。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Fusion detection with next-generation sequencing is challenging due to short read fragments, which can fail to fully resolve complex genomic rearrangements and map intronic breakpoints that lie outside targeted capture regions. Tumor methylation patterns, which reflect the functional state of cancer cells and do not rely on breakpoint coverage, are less impacted by sequencing fragment length and provide a robust orthogonal signal to augment genomic-based fusion calling. We developed a cell-free DNA (cfDNA) methylation-based fusion epigenotyping method to rescue fusions missed by genomic-based methods, focusing on ALK fusion detection in non-small lung cancer (NSCLC) to inform ALK inhibitor therapy selection.
Methods: NSCLC samples were processed using Guardant360 Liquid test (Guardant Health, Palo Alto, CA). Genome-wide cfDNA methylation profiles across thousands of regulatory regions together with genomic molecule support, were used to train a binary classifier that discriminates EML4-ALK fusion-positive from fusion-negative NSCLC. A logistic regression model was trained on 175 EML4-ALK fusion-positive and 175 fusion-negative samples. Concordance with NSCLC tissue samples was assessed by comparing tissue EML4-ALK -associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs, p<0.05) from TCGA data to fusion DMRs from Guardant360 Liquid cfDNA samples. To ensure clinical-grade specificity, a decision threshold targeting >99% specificity was calibrated on >11,000 genomic fusion-negative NSCLC samples. Model performance was evaluated on 102 independent positive cases (63 genomically detected, 39 genomically missed) with epigenomic tumor fraction > 0.1% from samples with (a) ALK inhibitor resistance mutations, (b) prior ALK inhibitor treatment, or (c) longitudinal history of genomic fusion detection. Fusion rescue rate was defined as the fraction of genomically missed fusions rescued by the epigenotyping classifier.
Results: Methylation concordance analysis between TCGA NSCLC tissues and Guardant360 Liquid cfDNA samples showed significant overlap, with 64% (1384/2168) of tissue EML4-ALK -associated differentially methylated regions (DMRs, p<0.05) also significant in cfDNA. In the test cohort, the epigenotyping classifier achieved 74% sensitivity, detecting 100% of fusions identified by the genomic caller. Among genomically missed cases, the classifier rescued 31% (12/39) of fusions.
Conclusion: A cfDNA methylation‑based fusion epigenotyping approach provides a high-specificity orthogonal signal that augments genomic fusion detection, recovering a substantial fraction of EML4-ALK fusions missed by the genomic method. Clinically, patients with rescued ALK fusions could be considered for effective and low toxicity targeted ALK inhibitor therapies.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Tung,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
A. Valouev,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
J. Odegaard,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
L. Lawrence,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
N. Zhang,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
M. Lefterova,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
M. Ellis,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
T. Jiang,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
S. Solomon,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.
D. Chudova,
Guardant Health Employment, Stock.