PO.BCS01.11 · 生物信息与计算
一种基于多组学集成的方法用于在cfDNA液体活检中高特异性检测克隆性造血
A multiomic ensemble-based approach for high-specificity detection of clonal hematopoiesis in cfDNA liquid biopsy
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
引言:源自克隆性造血(CH,或CHIP)的变异可能被误判为肿瘤来源,这在液体活检中是一个挑战,尤其是在扩展基因panel中。对血沉棕黄层(buffy coat)和血浆样本均进行测序有助于判定CH,但成本高昂,且受限于血沉棕黄层测序在低等位基因分数下的敏感性,以及其无法捕获非肿瘤和非外周血来源的体细胞变异。为解决这一问题,我们开发了一种针对晚期癌症患者的高特异性仅血浆CH分类器,并将其应用于临床数据,以洞察CH的患病率及潜在临床影响。
方法:该多组学分类器将非胚系变异分类为CH来源或肿瘤来源,是一个集成模型,利用了片段组学、甲基化肿瘤分数(mTF)、变异等位基因频率(VAF)以及来自超过250,000份Guardant Health样本和公共数据库(GnomAD、COSMIC)的变异层面和样本层面元数据。共使用1033份样本进行训练和测试,包括来自癌症患者的配对血沉棕黄层与血浆样本(N=686)或配对组织-血浆样本(N=305),以及来自无癌个体的样本(N=42),反映了目标使用人群的年龄(中位数:65)和癌种分布。在30,000份晚期癌症样本(中位年龄:67)中评估了人群层面的CH特征。
结果:185份测试样本的可行性结果显示,在具有复发性CH变异的基因(N≥6)中,panel范围内的敏感性和特异性均超过90%。在近30,000份晚期癌症样本中,前列腺癌的CH变异率相对于其他癌种升高。体细胞变异计数随mTF升高而增加,而CH变异计数保持相对稳定。在mTF为1%或更高的样本中,我们的方法揭示,16.9%的样本中最大变异等位基因频率(VAF)对应一个CH变异。最后,我们重现了此前报道的发现,即淋巴系相关CH变异随年龄增长的速度慢于髓系相关CH变异。
结论:我们提出了一种仅血浆CH分类器,应用于接受Guardant360 Liquid检测(Guardant Health,加州帕洛阿尔托)的癌症患者。可行性数据显示panel范围内的敏感性和特异性均高于90%,能够实现人群规模的CH特征描述。值得注意的是,在mTF为1%或更高的样本中,几乎17%的主导变异被判定为非肿瘤来源,突显出该方法能够对cfDNA中构成总VAF(maxMAF)的CH变异进行辨析。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Variants arising from clonal hematopoiesis (CH, or CHIP) can be misclassified as tumor-derived in liquid biopsy, and are a challenge especially in expanded gene panels. Sequencing both buffy coat and plasma samples can help adjudicate CH but is costly and limited by the sensitivity of buffy coat sequencing at low allele fractions and its inability to capture somatic variants of non-tumor and non-peripheral blood origin. To address this we developed a high-specificity plasma-only CH classifier for late-stage cancer patients and applied it to clinical data for insights into CH prevalence and potential clinical impact.
Methods: This multiomic classifier categorizes non-germline variants as CH- or tumor-derived and is an ensemble model leveraging fragmentomics, methylation tumor fraction (mTF), variant allele frequency (VAF) and variant- and sample-level metadata from over 250,000 Guardant Health samples and public data bases (GnomAD, COSMIC). A total of 1033 samples consisting of paired buffy coat and plasma (N=686) or paired tissue-plasma (N=305) from patients with cancer, and samples from cancer-free individuals (N=42) were used for training and testing, reflecting the age (median: 65) and cancer type distribution of the intended use population. Population-level CH characteristics were evaluated in 30,000 late-stage cancer samples (median age: 67).
Results: Feasibility results of 185 testing samples showed panel-wide sensitivity and specificity over 90% in genes with recurrent CH variants (N≥6). In nearly 30,000 late-stage cancer samples, CH variant rates were elevated in prostate cancer relative to other cancer types. Somatic variant counts increased with rising mTF, whereas CH variant counts remained relatively stable. In samples with mTF of 1% or higher, our approach revealed that for 16.9% of samples the maximum variant allele frequency (VAF) corresponded to a CH variant. Finally, we recapitulated previously reported findings that lymphoid-associated CH variants increase less rapidly with age compared to myeloid-associated CH variants.
Conclusion: We present a plasma-only CH classifier, applied on cancer patients run on the Guardant360 Liquid test (GuardantHealth, Palo Alto, CA). Feasibility data shows panel-wide sensitivity and specificity above 90%, enabling population-scale characterization of CH. Notably, in almost 17% of samples with mTF of 1% or greater the lead variant was determined to be non-tumor-derived, highlighting that this approach allows for disambiguation of CH variants that contribute to total VAF in cfDNA (maxMAF).
利益披露 Disclosure
P. C. Fiaux,
Guardant Health Employment.
M. Cai,
Guardant Health Employment.
J. L. Werbin,
Guardant Health Employment.
C. Lee,
Guardant Health Employment.
M. Juntilla,
Guardant Health Employment.
T. Jiang,
Guardant Health Employment.
R. Barnett,
Guardant Health Employment.
E. Lagow,
Guardant Health Employment.
S. Zhang,
Guardant Health Employment.
M. Lefterova,
Guardant Health Employment.
D. Chudova,
Guardant Health Employment.