PO.BCS01.11 · 生物信息与计算
整合的血浆多组学分析识别与NSCLC治疗反应相关的循环预测性生物标志物和生物学通路
Integrated plasma multi-omics profiling identifies circulating predictive biomarkers and biological pathways associated with treatment response in NSCLC
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
在非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)中,识别循环预测性生物标志物对于优化患者选择和改善治疗结局至关重要。基于血浆的生物标志物提供了一种微创且可连续获取的方法来监测治疗反应;然而,在高丰度血浆蛋白背景中疾病相关分析物的低丰度带来了显著的分析挑战。因此,需要高度敏感且可重复的多组学检测来探测与治疗相关的细微但具有生物学意义的变化。
为解决这一问题,我们实施了一套血浆多组学工作流程,整合了无偏质谱(P2 DIA-MS)、NULISA炎症面板以及使用Biocrates MxP Quant 1000试剂盒的靶向代谢组学。该工作流程被应用于纳入多中心II期临床试验SAKK 17/18的NSCLC患者的纵向血浆样本。平行分析定量了约6,000种血浆蛋白、250种炎症相关标志物以及超过1,200种代谢物和脂质,实现了蛋白质组学、细胞因子和代谢特征的跨平台整合。
对于预测性生物标志物的发现,我们应用机器学习框架整合蛋白质组学、炎症和代谢数据。与单组学模型相比,纳入多组学特征改善了对反应者与非反应者的分层,凸显了各数据集的互补性质。为进一步研究各组学层之间的生物学关系,我们评估了若干数据整合方法,包括多组学因子分析(MOFA),以识别共享的变异来源和相互关联的生物学通路。该分析揭示了将血浆蛋白质组学变化与炎症和代谢网络相连接的协调过程。例如,无偏蛋白质组学与炎症标志物整合所产生的免疫激活特征,以及在蛋白质组学-代谢组学关联中所反映的代谢应激适应。
总之,这种血浆多组学方法证明了整合蛋白质组学、炎症和代谢分析在识别预测性循环生物标志物以及阐明NSCLC治疗反应生物学机制方面的潜力。该工作流程为肿瘤学中的生物标志物发现和反应监测提供了一种可扩展且临床适用的策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
In non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), identifying circulating predictive biomarkers is critical to optimize patient selection and improve therapeutic outcomes. Plasma-based biomarkers offer a minimally invasive and serially accessible approach for monitoring treatment response; however, the low abundance of disease-relevant analytes within a background of highly abundant plasma proteins presents significant analytical challenges. Highly sensitive and reproducible multi-omics assays are therefore required to detect subtle but biologically relevant changes associated with therapy.
To address this, we implemented a plasma multi-omics workflow integrating unbiased mass spectrometry (P2 DIA-MS), the NULISA inflammation panel, and targeted metabolomics using the Biocrates MxP Quant 1000 kit. This workflow was applied to longitudinal plasma samples from patients with NSCLC enrolled in the multicenter phase II clinical trial SAKK 17/18. Parallel profiling quantified approximately 6,000 plasma proteins, 250 inflammation-related markers, and more than 1,200 metabolites and lipids, enabling cross-platform integration of proteomic, cytokine, and metabolic signatures.
For predictive biomarker discovery, we applied a machine learning framework to integrate proteomic, inflammatory, and metabolic data. Incorporation of multi-omics features improved the stratification of responders versus non-responders compared with single-omic models, underscoring the complementary nature of each dataset. To further investigate biological relationships among omics layers, we evaluated several data integration methods, including Multi-Omics Factor Analysis (MOFA), to identify shared sources of variation and linked biological pathways. This analysis revealed coordinated processes connecting plasma proteomic changes with inflammatory and metabolic networks. For example, immune activation signatures arising from the integration of unbiased proteomics with inflammation markers, and metabolic stress adaptation reflected in proteomic-metabolomic associations.
In conclusion, this plasma multi-omics approach demonstrates the potential of integrated proteomic, inflammatory, and metabolic profiling to identify predictive circulating biomarkers and to elucidate biological mechanisms of treatment response in NSCLC. The workflow provides a scalable and clinically applicable strategy for biomarker discovery and response monitoring in oncology.
利益披露 Disclosure
L. Heeb, None..
P. Shichkova, None..
S. Schär, None..
L. Räss, None..
A. Viodé, None..
M. Mehnert, None..
T. Treiber, None..
E. Wortmann, None..
G. Adam, None..
A. Limonciel, None.
M. Joerger,
Novartis Consultant/advisory fees.
Astra Zeneca Consultant/advisory fees.
Basilea Pharmaceuticals Consultant/advisory fees.
Bayer Consultant/advisory fees.
BMS Consultant/advisory fees.
Debiopharm Consultant/advisory fees.
MSD Travel, Consultant/advisory fees.
Roche Travel, Consultant/advisory fees.
Sanofi Consultant/advisory fees.
Takeda Travel.
J. Musilova, None..
S. Hayoz, None..
A. Gupta, None..
Y. Feng, None.
A. Curioni-Fontecedro,
Amgen Advisory board.
Astra Zeneca Advisory board.
Boehringer Ingelheim Advisory board.
Bristol Meyer Squibb Advisory board.
Daichii Sankyo Advisory board.
Janssen Advisory board.
MSD Advisory board.
Novartis Advisory board.
Roche Advisory board.
Takeda Advisory board.