PO.CL07.01 · 临床研究

探讨腹盆腔Rosai-Dorfman病中RAS突变对靶向治疗反应性的影响:一项病例对照研究

Exploring the impact of RAS mutations in abdominopelvic Rosai Dorfman disease on responsiveness to targeted therapies: A case control study

海报缩略图:探讨腹盆腔Rosai-Dorfman病中RAS突变对靶向治疗反应性的影响:一项病例对照研究
编号 2522 展板 29 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 43 主讲 Rebecca Denson, MD
分会场 Data-Driven Approaches to Precision Oncology
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Rebecca Denson1, Fnu Amisha2, David Pottinger2, Ling Zhang3, Lubomir Sokol2, Samuel Benjamin Reynolds2

1Medicine, Weill Cornell Medicine, New York, NY,2Hematology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL,3Hematopathology, Moffitt Cancer Center, Tampa, FL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:Rosai-Dorfman病(RDD)是一种非朗格汉斯细胞组织细胞肿瘤,组织学上以S100、CD68和CD163阳性的窦性组织细胞增生为特征,伴有不同程度的伸入运动(emperipolesis)。腹盆腔RDD代表一种罕见的疾病亚型,其分子图谱和相关的靶向治疗反应仍缺乏充分的表征。 方法:我们开展了一项单中心配对病例对照研究,将4例RAS突变的多灶性腹盆腔RDD患者与4例RAS野生型疾病患者进行比较。所有患者均有经确认的RDD组织病理学诊断,并有腹盆腔疾病的证据,通过直接病灶活检或显示从原发腹外部位延伸的影像学检查加以确认。使用能够检测至少50种突变和/或融合的新一代测序平台,对每位患者进行全面基因组分析。由一组研究者进行独立病例审查,以验证诊断、分子发现和疾病定位。 结果:在单一中心评估了4例年龄相近(64-70岁)的RAS突变腹盆腔RDD患者(3例KRAS突变,1例NRAS突变)。疾病定位包括3例患者的结肠周围软组织,1例患者伴有腹主动脉包裹。2例患者还被诊断为意义未明的克隆性造血,分别各有一例携带DNMT3A和RTEL1突变。所有4例患者均接受一线cobimetinib治疗,其中3例至少达到部分缓解,2例显示所有已知病灶部位近乎完全消退。3例患者因毒性需要减量。1例患者最终在减量期间出现进展并转为trametinib治疗;另1例因非RDD心脏原因去世。 我们还回顾了一个年龄匹配(63-79岁)的队列,包含4例缺乏基线RAS/MAPK通路或其他驱动突变的腹盆腔RDD患者。病灶总体分布于胰腺、下盆腔、腹股沟淋巴结以及腰椎邻近软组织。管理策略各不相同,仅2例患者接受一线全身治疗,一例序贯使用贝沙罗汀(bexarotene)后续利妥昔单抗(rituximab),另一例使用长春碱(vinblastine)。3例患者在病程中接受放疗,一例作为局限性疾病的单一疗法,两例作为全身治疗后的巩固治疗。其余患者未接受治疗,予以观察。 结论:与野生型相比,RAS突变的腹盆腔RDD患者往往经历更具侵袭性的疾病病程,但对靶向MAP激酶通路的疗法表现出显著的敏感性。本研究的发现受限于样本量小;目前正在努力扩展至多中心队列。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: Rosai Dorfman Disease (RDD) is a non-Langerhans cell histiocytic neoplasm characterized histologically by S100, CD68 and CD163 positive sinus histiocytosis with variable emperipolesis. Abdominopelvic RDD represents a rare disease subtype, for which the molecular landscape and associated responses to targeted therapies remain poorly characterized. Methods: We conducted a single-center matched case-control study comparing 4 patients with RAS- mutated multifocal abdominopelvic RDD to 4 with RAS wild-type disease. All patients had confirmed histopathologic diagnoses of RDD with evidence of abdominopelvic disease, confirmed by either direct lesional biopsy or imaging demonstrating extension from a primary extra-abdominal site. Comprehensive genomic profiling was performed for each patient using a next-generation sequencing platform capable of detecting at least 50 mutations and/or fusions. Independent case review was conducted by a panel of investigators to validate diagnoses, molecular findings, and disease localization. Results: Four similarly aged patients (64-70 years) with RAS- mutated abdominopelvic RDD (3 with KRAS mutations, 1 with NRAS mutation) were evaluated at a single center. Disease localization included peri-colonic soft tissues in 3 patients and with encasement of the abdominal aorta in one patient. Two patients were also diagnosed with clonal hematopoiesis of indeterminate potential, one each respectively harboring DNMT3A and RTEL1 mutations. All 4 patients received frontline cobimetinib with 3 achieving at least a partial response and two demonstrating near-complete resolution of all known disease sites. Dose attenuations were required in three patients due to toxicities. One patient eventually progressed during dose reduction and was transitioned to trametinib; another passed from non-RDD cardiac causes. We also reviewed an age-matched cohort (63-79) of 4 patients with abdominopelvic RDD lacking baseline RAS/MAPK pathway or other driver mutations. Lesions were collectively identified in the pancreas, lower pelvis, inguinal lymph nodes and soft tissues proximal to the lumbar spine. Management strategies varied as only two patients received frontline systemic therapy, one sequentially with bexarotene followed by rituximab and the other with vinblastine. Three patients underwent radiation during their disease course, one as monotherapy for localized disease and two in consolidation following the systemic therapy. The remaining patient was observed off treatment. Conclusions: Patients with RAS - mutated abdominopelvic RDD tend to experience a more aggressive disease course compared to wildtype but demonstrate marked sensitivity to MAP Kinase pathway-targeting therapies. The findings of this study are limited by small sample size; ongoing efforts are underway to expand with a multi-center cohort.
利益披露 Disclosure
R. Denson, None.. F. Amisha, None.. D. Pottinger, None.. L. Zhang, None.. L. Sokol, None.. S. B. Reynolds, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索