PO.CL07.05 · 临床研究

Sequencing immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in advanced melanoma: A meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-reconstructed individual level data

海报缩略图:Sequencing immune checkpoint inhibitors and BRAF/MEK inhibitors in advanced melanoma: A meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier-reconstructed individual level data
编号 2653 展板 5 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 49 主讲 Anderson Simoes
分会场 Targeted Antigen Therapies and Immunity
查看完整资料 下载 PDF 登录后可访问当前开放资料 AACR 官方页面 ↗

作者与单位

Anderson Ruiz Simoes1, Isabella Michelon2, Wellington Neto3, Metamia Ciampricotti4, Ludimila Cavalcante5

1Federal University of São Paulo (UNIFESP), São Paulo, Brazil,2Universidade Católica de Pelotas, Pelotas, Brazil,3Universidade de Fortaleza, Fortaleza, Brazil,4MSKCC, New York, NY,5Division of Hematology & Oncology, University of Virginia (UVA), Charlottesville, VA

摘要 Abstract

Objectives: Optimal sequencing of immune checkpoint inhibitors (ICI) and BRAF inhibitors (BRAFi) for BRAFV600-mutant advanced melanoma remains uncertain. We conducted a meta-analysis of Kaplan-Meier (KM)-reconstructed individual-patient data (IPD) comparing two clinically used sequences: First-line ICI followed by BRAFi (ICI-BRAFi) versus first-line BRAFi followed by ICI (BRAFi-ICI). Methods: We searched MEDLINE, Embase, and Cochrane for phase II/III studies reporting KM curves for stage III/IV melanoma patients treated with either ICI-BRAFi or BRAFi-ICI. Outcomes were progression-free survival (PFS) and overall survival (OS). Secondary endpoints were toxicity and brain-metastasis-free survival (BMFS). Reconstructed IPD were analyzed with Cox proportional hazards (PH) models. We additionally estimated restricted mean survival time (RMST) up to 24 months (m) (Grambsch-Therneau test, p<0.05). Results: Six studies with 832 patients were included, of which 426 patients received ICI-BRAFi, and 406 BRAFi-ICI. Median PFS was approximately 12 m for both groups (p=0.1, log-rank). PFS at 24 m was 42.8 and 29 m for ICI-BRAFi and BRAFi-ICI, respectively. The PFS RMST difference at 24 m was 0.32 m (95% CI: -1.1 - 1.8 months; p=0.66). Median OS was 58.2 m for ICI-BRAFi and 40.3 m for BRAFi-ICI. OS at 24 m was 65.9% and 60.7% for ICI-BRAFi and BRAFi-ICI groups, respectively (p=0.4; log-rank). The RMST revealed a slight and nonsignificant OS difference of -0.49 m (95% CI: -1.64 - 0.67 months; p=0.41). In a pooled analysis including the only two randomized studies SECOMBIT and DREAMseq, we found a median PFS of 31.5 m for ICI and 13.1 m for BRAFi (p=0.003); and median OS was NA and 32.7 m for ICI and BRAFi (p=0.005). Conclusion: ICI-BRAFi led to significantly longer PFS and OS than BRAFi-ICI when evaluating only randomized clinical trials, supporting ICI-first sequencing. $$table_{CF128EEB-D4BD-4130-95C0-74E89761CA49}$$ Survival data in ICI-BRAFi vs BRAFi-ICI cohorts ICI–BRAFi BRAFi–ICI p value Overall median PFS 12.5 months (9.6-23.3) 12 (10.7-14) 0.1 PFS at 24 months 42.8 months (36.9-49.7) 29 months (24.2-34.4) - Median PFS with RCT only 31.5 months (13.9-44.1) 13.1 months (11.3-16.7) 0.003 Overall median OS 58.2 months (37.5-NA) 40.3 months (32.4-NA) 0.4 Os at 24 months 65.9 % (60.2-72.1 %) 60.7 % (55.6-66.2 %) - Median OS with RCT only NA (55.5-NA) 32.7 (23.1-59.7) 0.005
利益披露 Disclosure
A. R. Simoes, None.. I. Michelon, None.. W. Neto, None.. M. Ciampricotti, None.. L. Cavalcante, None.

在会议检索中打开