PO.BCS01.11 · 生物信息与计算

5碱基和6碱基检测的高分析灵敏度与特异性对于增强液体活检应用中ctDNA检测的重要性

The importance of high analytical sensitivity and specificity of 5 and 6-base assays to enhance the detection of ctDNA in liquid biopsy applications

海报缩略图:5碱基和6碱基检测的高分析灵敏度与特异性对于增强液体活检应用中ctDNA检测的重要性
编号 123 展板 30 时间 4/19 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 5 主讲 THAO HUYNH
分会场 Liquid Biopsy: Multi-Analyte and Multi-Omic
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tom Charlesworth, Luke Sarre, Cillian Nolan, Fabio Puddu, Annelie Johansson, Aurelie Modat, Ermira Lleshi, Simeone Angela, Robert Crawford, Robert J. Osborne, Thao Huynh

biomodal Ltd, Cambridge, United Kingdom

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
在液体活检中,于游离DNA(cfDNA)内灵敏地检测癌症来源的DNA片段(ctDNA),对于识别早期癌症、监测治疗反应和微小残留病灶至关重要。这些应用中的一个主要挑战是,当ctDNA仅占总cfDNA的一小部分时,如何检测出这一指示疾病状态的ctDNA。甲基化组分析的进展,包括使用 duet evoC 进行的可区分5-甲基胞嘧啶(5mC)与5-羟甲基胞嘧啶(5hmC)的6碱基测序,通过分析单个测序片段上的甲基化模式(片段水平分析),而非在单个CpG位点上对甲基化水平取平均值的更传统分析,实现了高灵敏度的ctDNA检测。我们对来自 biomodal 的 duet 系列甲基化检测与替代甲基化测序技术之间在片段水平甲基化分析中的背景错误率进行了比较分析,结果显示两种 biomodal 检测的错误率均低于10^-5,而替代技术的错误率高于10^-4。我们进一步展示了这种更低的错误率如何能够实现对ctDNA更灵敏的检测,并展示了这些技术在检测来自I-IV期结直肠癌诊断患者cfDNA中ctDNA的应用。我们的研究结果进一步强调了片段水平分析在基于cfDNA的应用中的强大能力。这些结果表明,从有限的cfDNA样本中获得最大临床灵敏度和特异性,仔细考虑分析性能至关重要。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Sensitive detection of cancer-derived DNA fragments (ctDNA) within cell-free DNA (cfDNA) in liquid biopsy is essential for identifying early-stage cancers, monitoring treatment response and minimal residual disease. A major challenge in these applications is detecting ctDNA, indicative of disease state, when this represents a small fraction of the total cfDNA. Advances in methylomic profiling, including 6-base sequencing with duet evoC which distinguishes 5-methylcytosine (5mC) and 5-hydroxymethylcytosine (5hmC), have enabled high-sensitivity ctDNA detection by analyzing methylation patterns across individual sequencing fragments (fragment level analysis) as opposed to more traditional analyses that average methylation levels at individual CpG loci. We present a comparative analysis of the background error rates in fragment-level methylation analysis between the duet suite of methylation assays from biomodal and alternative methylation sequencing technologies, showing error rates below 10 -5 for both biomodal assays compared to error rates above 10 -4 for alternative technologies. We further show how this lower error rate can enable more sensitive detection of ctDNA, and present the application of these technologies to detecting ctDNA in cfDNA from patients diagnosed with stages I-IV colorectal cancer. Our findings further emphasize the power of fragment-level analyses in cfDNA-based applications. They illustrate that it is critical to carefully consider analytical performance to achieve maximum clinical sensitivity and specificity from limited cfDNA samples.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Charlesworth, None.. T. Huynh, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索