PO.ET02.05 · 实验与分子治疗

基于自动化成像的单细胞克隆单克隆性验证证实,与有限稀释法相比,Pala单细胞分选与分液系统效率更高

Automated imaging-based verification of monoclonality in single-cell cloning confirms higher efficiency of the Pala single cell sorter and dispenser compared to limiting-dilution assays

海报缩略图:基于自动化成像的单细胞克隆单克隆性验证证实,与有限稀释法相比,Pala单细胞分选与分液系统效率更高
编号 1651 展板 10 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 11 主讲 Ryan McComb, BS;MS;PhD
分会场 Antibody Technologies and Platforms 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ahmed Shaaban1, Benjamin Werdelmann2, Anna Willms2, Matthias Pirsch2, Sebastian Kollenda2, Aleks Guledani2, Ankit Vaghasiya2, Susanne Sebens3, Ryan McComb1, Reinhild Geisen2

1Bio-Techne, San Jose, CA,2Synentec GmbH, Elmshorn, Germany,3Institute for Experimental Cancer Research and University Hospital Schleswig-Holstein Campus Kiel, Kiel, Germany

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
建立单克隆细胞系是癌症研究和药物发现中的常见流程,可确保功能测定、治疗性抗体生产和临床制造中的遗传均一性与可重复性。然而,由于传统有限稀释法(LDA)效率低且人工操作耗时长,分离单细胞并确认其单克隆来源仍是主要瓶颈。因此,我们评估了一种将Pala单细胞分选与分液系统(Bio-Techne)与SYNENTEC自动化成像系统相结合的工作流程,以获得可靠、可追溯的单克隆性证据,并将其与LDA进行了比较。 使用Pala将每孔一个细胞分液至10×96孔板中,同时以0.5个细胞/孔制备平行的LDA对照。在使用癌细胞系测试该系统之前,我们采用CHO-K1细胞作为主要生产细胞系,作为流程验证的稳健细胞模型。使用SYNENTEC高通量成像系统在第−1、0、1、4和8天对孔进行自动成像。使用YT-SOFTWARE®进行自动化分割、克隆追踪和汇合度分析。根据初始及后续图像,将孔分类为克隆性、非克隆性、空孔或“幽灵”孔。在两种方法之间比较了单细胞分液效率、集落形成率和生长动力学。 Pala分液产生了828个单克隆集落,而LDA仅为329个,增加超过2.5倍。每块96孔板的单克隆孔平均数更高(71.2对32.8),而非克隆孔(7.2对13.4)和空孔(16.6对49.5)的数量减少。Pala的每个单细胞平均克隆生长率(89.8%对78.4%)和生长速率(0.86对0.83)更高,表明其操作温和且活力更佳。该自动化工作流程减少了人工操作时间,并为法规合规性提供了清晰的文档记录。 将Pala单细胞分液与SYNENTEC自动化成像相结合,可提高克隆产量、效率和可追溯性,同时减少资源消耗。该方法加速了标准化、可重复细胞模型的建立,并支持高通量生物治疗和转化肿瘤学研究。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Establishing monoclonal cell lines is a common process in cancer research and drug discovery, ensuring genetic uniformity and reproducibility in functional assays, therapeutic antibody production, and clinical manufacturing. However, isolating single cells and confirming their monoclonal origin remain major bottlenecks due to the low efficiency and high hands-on time of conventional limiting-dilution assays (LDA). We therefore assessed a workflow combining the Pala Single Cell Sorter and Dispenser (Bio-Techne) with SYNENTEC's automated imaging system for reliable, traceable proof of monoclonality and compared it to LDA. One cell per well was dispensed into 10 × 96-well plates using Pala, and parallel LDA controls were prepared at 0.5 cells/well. We used CHO-K1 cells as the main production cell line as a robust cell model for process validation, before testing the system with cancer cell lines. Wells were automatically imaged on days −1, 0, 1, 4, and 8 using SYNENTEC's high-throughput imaging system. Automated segmentation, clone tracking, and confluence analysis were performed with YT-SOFTWARE®. Wells were classified as clonal, non-clonal, empty, or ‘ghost' based on initial and subsequent images. Single-cell dispensing efficiency, colony formation rate, and growth kinetics were compared between methods. Pala dispensing yielded 828 monoclonal colonies versus 329 from LDA, representing a >2.5-fold increase. The average number of monoclonal wells per 96-well plate was higher (71.2 vs. 32.8), while the number of non-clonal (7.2 vs. 13.4) and empty wells (16.6 vs. 49.5) was reduced. Average clonal outgrowth per single cell (89.8 % vs. 78.4 %) and growth rate (0.86 vs. 0.83) were higher for Pala, indicating gentle handling and improved viability. The automated workflow reduced hands-on time and provided clear documentation for regulatory compliance. Combining Pala single-cell dispensing with SYNENTEC's automated imaging enhances clonal yield, efficiency, and traceability while reducing resource consumption. This approach accelerates the establishment of standardized, reproducible cell models and supports high-throughput biotherapeutic and translational oncology research.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Shaaban, None.. B. Werdelmann, None.. A. Willms, None.. M. Pirsch, None.. S. Kollenda, None.. A. Guledani, None.. A. Vaghasiya, None.. S. Sebens, None.. R. McComb, None.. R. Geisen, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索