PO.ET03.07 · 实验与分子治疗

BCL6的表观遗传重编程驱动大B细胞淋巴瘤的治疗应答并揭示合成依赖性

Epigenetic rewiring of BCL6 drives responses and unveils synthetic dependencies in large B cell lymphoma

海报缩略图:BCL6的表观遗传重编程驱动大B细胞淋巴瘤的治疗应答并揭示合成依赖性
编号 1844 展板 4 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 18 主讲 Haopeng Yang, PhD
分会场 Targeting Drug Resistance 1: Apoptosis and Autophagy
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Haopeng Yang1, Kevin Bowman1, Wenzhi Ji2, Sai Gourisankar2, Ashley L. Wilson1, Zihan Yang1, Ethan Marszalek1, Stephen M. Hinshaw2, Tinghu Zhang2, Xiaofan Liu2, Andrey Krokhotin2, Sabin Nettles2, Suprateek Kundu1, Gerald R. Crabtree2, Nathanael S. Gray2, Michael R. Green1

1UT MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, TX,2Stanford University, Stanford, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
弥漫性大B细胞淋巴瘤(DLBCL)是一种临床和分子层面高度异质的恶性肿瘤,可分为生发中心型(GCB)和活化B细胞型(ABC)亚型。在临床上,这些亚群通常通过免疫组化(IHC)进行分类,其中CD10和BCL6表达是GCB的特征,而IRF4(MUM1)表达是ABC的特征。通过在一线化学免疫治疗基础上加用靶向治疗以抑制ABC型DLBCL中活跃信号通路的努力未能达到其主要终点,而DLBCL对靶向治疗的耐药机制尚未在临床相关模型中得到广泛探索。靶向BCL6近期已成为一个令人振奋的治疗方向,多种BCL6降解剂目前正在早期临床试验中接受测试。靶向BCL6的转录/表观遗传化学邻近诱导剂(TCIP)是一种创新方法,可招募转录共激活因子,将BCL6从转录抑制因子转变为激活因子,并诱导其靶基因的表达。我们利用广泛的PDX资源库,全面测试了一种将BRD4招募至BCL6结合位点的TCIP(TCIP1)的疗效,评估了BCL6在IHC上表现为一致高表达(n=5)、异质表达(n=6)或阴性(n=2)的模型。所有BCL6高表达的PDX模型均对TCIP1迅速产生应答,在5个模型中的4个中肿瘤被根除,包括那些携带p53突变的CAR T难治性肿瘤模型。正如预期,BCL6阴性模型未显示应答。有趣的是,与载体对照相比,BCL6异质模型也未显示应答。通过对BCL6高表达(n=3)或异质(n=3)模型进行短期体内暴露于TCIP1、其组成成分(BCL6 BTB结合剂;BRD4结合剂)或载体对照后的RNA测序进行的机制研究显示,BCL6异质模型中IRF4活性发生选择性上调。IHC评估显示,在基线时,BCL6异质模型由BCL6+IRF4-和BCL6-IRF4+细胞的混合群体组成,在TCIP1压力下被极化为一致的BCL6-IRF4+状态,随后在二次移植后又恢复到异质状态。IRF4可通过来那度胺(len)被间接靶向,因此我们在两个BCL6异质模型中评估了TCIP1+len联合治疗的活性。与载体对照相比,单药TCIP1或len治疗未导致肿瘤体积的显著缩小。然而,TCIP+len驱动了显著的体内应答。总之,我们首次提供数据表明,表观遗传镶嵌性和可塑性是DLBCL对靶向治疗的一种耐药机制。利用大量PDX模型,我们展示了TCIP1在BCL6高表达DLBCL中令人印象深刻的疗效,并通过TCIP1与来那度胺联合靶向极化表观遗传状态,确定了一种克服经由表观遗传可塑性逃逸的合理策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Diffuse large B cell lymphoma (DLBCL) is a clinically and molecularly heterogeneous malignancy that can be classified into germinal center (GCB) and activated B cell (ABC) subtypes. Clinically, these subsets are often classified by immunohistochemistry (IHC) with CD10 and BCL6 expression being characteristic of GCB and IRF4 (MUM1) expression being characteristic of ABC. Efforts to inhibit signaling pathways active in ABC DLBCL by addition of targeted therapies to frontline chemoimmunotherapy have failed to meet their primary endpoints, and mechanisms of resistance to targeted therapies in DLBCL have not been extensively explored in clinically relevant models. Targeting BCL6 has recently emerged as an exciting therapeutic direction, with multiple BCL6 degraders now being tested in early phase clinical trials. BCL6-targeting transcriptional/epigenetic chemical inducers of proximity (TCIP) are an innovative approach to recruit transcriptional coactivators that flip BCL6 from a transcriptional repressor to an activator and induce the expression of its target genes. We thoroughly tested the efficacy of a TCIP that recruits BRD4 to BCL6-bound site (TCIP1) using our extensive PDX repository, evaluating models with uniformly high (n=5), heterogeneous (n=6) or negative (n=2) expression of BCL6 by IHC. PDX models with high BCL6 expression all responded rapidly to TCIP1, with eradication of tumors in 4/5 models including those from CAR T refractory tumors with p53 mutation. As expected, BCL6 negative models showed no response. Interestingly, BCL6 heterogeneous models also showed no response compared to vehicle control. Mechanistic studies by RNA-sequencing following short term in vivo exposure to TCIP1, its constituent components (BCL6 BTB binder; BRD4 binder) or vehicle control in BCL6 high (n=3) or heterogeneous (n=3) models revealed a selective up-regulation of IRF4 activity in BCL6 heterogeneous models. Evaluation by IHC showed that, at baseline, BCL6 heterogenous models consisted of mixed populations of BCL6+IRF4- and BCL6-IRF4+ cells that were polarized to a uniformly BCL6-IRF4+ state under TCIP1 pressure, then returned to heterogeneous states following secondary implantation. IRF4 can be indirectly targeted using lenalidomide (len), thus we evaluated the activity of TCIP1+len combination in two BCL6 heterogeneous models. Single agent TCIP1 or len treatment resulted in no significant reduction in tumor volume compared to vehicle control. However, TCIP+len drove significant in vivo responses. In conclusion, we present the first data implicating epigenetic mosaicism and plasticity as a resistance mechanism to targeted therapy in DLBCL. Using a large array of PDX models we show impressive efficacy for TCIP1 in BCL6 high DLBCL and identify a rational strategy to overcome escape via epigenetic plasticity using a combination of TCIP1 and lenalidomide to target polar epigenetic states.
利益披露 Disclosure
H. Yang, None.. K. Bowman, None.. W. Ji, None.. S. Gourisankar, None.. A. L. Wilson, None.. Z. Yang, None.. E. Marszalek, None.. S. M. Hinshaw, None.. T. Zhang, None.. X. Liu, None.. A. Krokhotin, None.. S. Nettles, None.. S. Kundu, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索