PO.IM01.16 · 免疫学

TNF驱动的旁分泌杀伤决定了Teclistamab在骨髓瘤中的细胞毒性疗效

TNF-driven paracrine killing determines the cytotoxic efficacy of Teclistamab in Myeloma

海报缩略图:TNF驱动的旁分泌杀伤决定了Teclistamab在骨髓瘤中的细胞毒性疗效
编号 1636 展板 28 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 10 主讲 Allison Carr, BS
分会场 T Cell Engagers 1
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Allison Carr1, Elise Sintim-Aboagye2, Adrian Ting1

1Immunology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN,2Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
多发性骨髓瘤是美国成人中第二常见的血液系统恶性肿瘤,目前仍无法治愈。免疫疗法,包括靶向BCMA的双特异性T细胞衔接器(BiTE),已大大改善了预后。然而,仍有相当一部分患者未能应答,或发展为耐药性疾病。传统的T细胞细胞毒性模型侧重于在抗原识别和T细胞激活后递送含穿孔素和颗粒酶的颗粒,这是一种低效的杀伤方式,需要效应细胞与靶细胞接触。然而,激活的T细胞也会分泌能够扩散并作用于远端靶标的细胞因子。这提示存在旁分泌杀伤的可能性,即这些细胞因子独立于细胞间接触诱导肿瘤细胞死亡。肿瘤坏死因子(TNF)是T细胞激活期间释放的一种关键细胞因子,其独特之处在于既可驱动细胞存活也可驱动细胞死亡。尽管大多数细胞默认走向细胞存活和NFkB介导的炎症,但若干调节因子可将这种存活信号转向细胞死亡。因此,我们假设使骨髓瘤细胞对TNF敏感化可以实现T细胞旁分泌杀伤,并增强抗骨髓瘤T细胞免疫疗法的疗效。为验证这一点,我们首先建立了一个对Teclistamab(一种BCMA导向的BiTE)临床应答的体外模型,使用了对T细胞杀伤表现出敏感、中等或耐药应答的多发性骨髓瘤细胞系。将这些数据与细胞因子敏感性和受体表达的检测结合,我们发现对TNF介导的细胞死亡的易感性是Teclistamab敏感性的一个主要决定因素。当使用单克隆抗体从这些共培养中中和可溶性TNF时,对敏感骨髓瘤细胞系的Teclistamab T细胞杀伤减少或完全消除,进一步支持了这一相关性。对已知TNF存活信号调节因子进行药理学抑制和CRISPR介导的删除,进一步使骨髓瘤细胞对TNF和T细胞杀伤敏感化。在缺乏这些调节因子的情况下,BCMA阴性的骨髓瘤靶标仍保留对Teclistamab的敏感性,支持了细胞死亡的主要机制确实是旁分泌杀伤这一观点。总之,这些发现在TNF敏感性与T细胞介导的骨髓瘤细胞杀伤之间建立了直接联系,并支持TNF驱动的旁分泌杀伤作为Teclistamab应答的主导机制。因此,增强这种TNF介导的死亡信号或可代表一种克服耐药并改善基于T细胞的免疫疗法在多发性骨髓瘤中临床疗效的策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Multiple Myeloma is the second most common hematologic malignancy among US adults and remains incurable. Immunotherapies, including bispecific T cell engagers (BiTEs) targeting BCMA, have greatly improved outcomes. However, a significant fraction of patients still fail to respond, or develop resistant disease. Conventional models of T cell cytotoxicity focus on delivery of perforin- and granzyme-containing granules following antigen recognition and T cell activation, an inefficient mode of killing that requires effector-to-target cell contact. Activated T cells, however, also secrete cytokines capable of diffusing and acting on distant targets. This raises the possibility of paracrine killing, in which these cytokines induce tumor cell death independently of cell-cell contact.Tumor necrosis factor (TNF) is a key cytokine released during T cell activation and is unique in that it can drive either cell survival or cell death. Although most cells default to cell survival and NFkB-mediated inflammation, several modulators can shift this survival signaling toward cell death. We therefore hypothesized that sensitizing Myeloma cells to TNF could enable T cell paracrine killing and enhance the efficacy of anti-Myeloma T cell immunotherapies.To test this, we first established an in vitro model of clinical response to Teclistamab, a BCMA-directed BiTE, using Multiple Myeloma cell lines that displayed sensitive, intermediate, or resistant responses to T cell killing. Combining these data with assays of cytokine sensitivity and receptor expression, we found that susceptibility to TNF-mediated cell death was a major determinant of Teclistamab sensitivity. This correlation was further supported by reduction or complete abrogation of Teclistamab T cell killing of sensitive Myeloma cell lines when soluble TNF was neutralized from these co-cultures using monoclonal antibodies. Pharmacologic inhibition and CRISPR-mediated deletion of known regulators of TNF survival-signaling further sensitized Myeloma cells to both TNF and T cell killing. In the absence of these regulators, BCMA-negative myeloma targets retained sensitivity to Teclistamab, supporting the idea that the main mechanism of cell death was indeed paracrine killing.Together, these findings establish a direct link between TNF sensitivity and T cell-mediated killing of Myeloma cells, and support TNF-driven paracrine killing as a dominant mechanism of response to Teclistamab. Enhancing this TNF-mediated death signaling may therefore represent a strategy to overcome resistance and improve clinical efficacy of T cell-based immunotherapies in Multiple Myeloma.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Carr, None.. E. Sintim-Aboagye, None.. A. Ting, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索