PO.MCB01.01 · 分子与细胞生物学

利用CETSA®对CDK2抑制剂进行全蛋白质组范围的靶点结合与选择性分析

Proteome-wide target engagement and selectivity profiling of CDK2 inhibitors using CETSA®

海报缩略图:利用CETSA®对CDK2抑制剂进行全蛋白质组范围的靶点结合与选择性分析
编号 1894 展板 2 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 20 主讲 Tomas Friman, PhD
分会场 Cell Cycle
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Tomas Friman, Merve Kacal, Tuomas Tolvanen

Pelago Bioscience AB, Solna, Sweden

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
有丝分裂和细胞周期是癌症及其他肿瘤性疾病的关键组成部分。细胞周期受到严格调控,但在肿瘤中常发生失调,使其核心调控因子成为抗肿瘤治疗的有吸引力的靶点。细胞周期蛋白依赖性激酶(CDKs)与细胞周期蛋白形成复合物,以磷酸化驱动细胞周期进程的关键蛋白。CDK4/6双重抑制是部分乳腺癌亚型中一种成熟的治疗策略,但耐药很常见。因此,靶向CDK2已成为克服CDK4/6抑制耐药的一种策略。CDK4/6主要通过调控视网膜母细胞瘤相关蛋白(RB1)的磷酸化来控制早期细胞周期进程,而CDK2既参与该阶段,也调控更晚期的细胞周期转变。因此,CDK2抑制剂相较于CDK4/6抑制剂可能提供额外的治疗获益。近期已开发出若干CDK2选择性抑制剂,包括Tagtociclib(PF-07104091)、Cirtociclib(BLU-222)和INX-315。在此,我们研究了这些CDK2选择性激酶抑制剂的全蛋白质组范围靶点结合与选择性特征,并将它们与已获批的CDK4/6抑制剂(palbociclib、ribociclib和abemaciclib)及泛CDK探针进行了比较。我们采用了与质谱(MS)联用的细胞热位移分析(CETSA®)。CETSA监测药物诱导的蛋白质热稳定性变化,可应用于完整细胞或细胞裂解物,而无需对蛋白质、配体或细胞进行修饰。基于MS的读出方式能够无偏倚地在全蛋白质组范围内检测小分子-蛋白质相互作用,包括非激酶靶点和下游通路组分。所有受试的CDK2选择性抑制剂在30 μM的高浓度下均结合了CDK2及其他激酶。与CDK4/6抑制剂相比,它们对CDK4/6的结合较弱,但与CDK4/6抑制剂一样,均诱导了RB1的热稳定性失稳,表明其对RB1依赖性通路具有共同的影响。对CDK1的靶点结合仅限于CDK2选择性和泛CDK抑制剂,且仅在较高化合物浓度下观察到。总体而言,这些数据表明CETSA MS在跨蛋白质组绘制靶点结合与选择性图谱方面的实用价值,以及在表征CDK抑制剂从早期泛CDK化合物向现代CDK2选择性药物演变过程中的作用。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Mitosis and the cell cycle is a pivotal part of cancers and other neoplastic diseases. The cell cycle is tightly regulated, yet frequently deregulated in tumors, making its core regulators attractive targets for anti-tumor therapy. Cyclin-dependent kinases (CDKs) form complexes with cyclins to phosphorylate key proteins that drive cell-cycle progression. Dual CDK4/6 inhibition is an established treatment strategy in subsets of breast cancer, but resistance is common. Targeting CDK2 has therefore emerged as a strategy to overcome resistance to CDK4/6 inhibition. While CDK4/6 primarily controls early cell-cycle progression by regulating phosphorylation of the retinoblastoma-associated protein (RB1), CDK2 participates in this phase and regulates later cell-cycle transitions. CDK2 inhibitors may thus offer additional therapeutic benefits compared with CDK4/6 inhibitors. Several CDK2-selective inhibitors have recently been developed, including Tagtociclib (PF-07104091), Cirtociclib (BLU-222), and INX-315. Here, we investigated the proteome-wide target engagement and selectivity profiles of these CDK2-selective kinase inhibitors and compared them with those of approved CDK4/6 inhibitors (palbociclib, ribociclib, and abemaciclib) and pan-CDK probes. We utilized the cellular thermal shift assay (CETSA®) coupled with mass spectrometry (MS). CETSA monitors drug-induced changes in protein thermal stability and can be applied in intact cells or cell lysates without modifying proteins, ligands, or cells. An MS-based readout enables unbiased, proteome-wide detection of small-molecule-protein interactions, including non-kinase targets and downstream pathway components. All tested CDK2-selective inhibitors engaged CDK2 and additional kinases at high concentrations of 30 µM. Compared with CDK4/6 inhibitors, they showed weaker engagement of CDK4/6 but, like CDK4/6 inhibitors, induced thermal destabilization of RB1, indicating a shared impact on RB1-dependent pathways. Target engagement of CDK1 was restricted to CDK2-selective and pan-CDK inhibitors and was only observed at higher compound concentrations. Together, these data illustrate the utility of CETSA MS for mapping target engagement and selectivity across the proteome, as well as for characterizing the evolution of CDK inhibitors from early pan-CDK compounds to modern CDK2-selective agents.
利益披露 Disclosure
T. Friman, Pelago Bioscience AB Employment. M. Kacal, Pelago Bioscience AB Employment. T. Tolvanen, Pelago Bioscience AB Employment.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索