PO.MCB06.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

非破坏性甲基化测序可在FFPE和cfDNA样本中同时检测遗传变异与表观遗传变异

Non-destructive methylation sequencing enables concurrent detection of genetic and epigenetic variation in FFPE and cfDNA samples

海报缩略图:非破坏性甲基化测序可在FFPE和cfDNA样本中同时检测遗传变异与表观遗传变异
编号 1951 展板 3 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 22 主讲 Max Boeck
分会场 DNA Methylation
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Max Boeck1, Jennifer Pavlica1, Craig MARSHALL1, Travis Sanders2, Kristina Giorda1, Martin Ranik1, Eduard Casas1, Thomas D. Harrison1, Kailee Reed1, Aaron Garnett1, Doug Wendel1, Brian Kudlow1

1Watchmaker Genomics, Boulder, CO,2Travis Sanders (Individual)

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
全面的肿瘤表征越来越需要基因组和表观基因组信息,然而当前的甲基化谱分析方法(如基于亚硫酸氢盐的工作流程)因DNA降解和序列复杂度降低而限制了灵敏度和准确性。为解决这些限制,我们开发了一种改进的正向转化化学方法,可直接转化甲基化胞嘧啶同时保留未甲基化胞嘧啶,从而能够从单个NGS文库中同时检测胞嘧啶修饰和遗传变异。该方法旨在支持肿瘤学研究应用,在这些应用中,从有限或受损材料(如FFPE组织和游离循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA))获得高准确性至关重要。 为评估性能,采用优化的氧化还原工作流程处理FFPE、新鲜冷冻和cfDNA样本。文库在标准短读长平台上测序,并评估甲基化准确性、F1分数、CNV一致性以及肿瘤-正常甲基化对比。性能与全基因组测序(WGS)对照以及传统的亚硫酸氢盐和酶法甲基化测序方法进行比较。该化学方法展示出对修饰胞嘧啶的高效还原,能够以低假阳性率进行高置信度甲基化检出。序列复杂度得以维持,允许从同一文库中稳健地检测SNV和CNV。与酶法甲基化测序相比,FFPE样本表现出改善的CpG覆盖、更少的序列伪影和更高的文库复杂度。由少至1 ng生成的cfDNA文库产生了适用于组织来源分析的可靠全局甲基化谱。该化学方法的非破坏性特性保留了cfDNA片段,为片段组学分析打开了大门。在肿瘤-正常比较中,差异甲基化区域(DMR)得到清晰分辨,支持更精确地识别肿瘤特异性表观遗传改变。 这种增强的正向转化化学方法实现了从单个检测中进行统一的基因组和表观基因组分析,使其非常适合肿瘤学研究应用,如肿瘤分类、生物标志物发现、微小残留病(MRD)评估和液体活检。其温和条件、对降解FFPE DNA和低输入cfDNA的兼容性,以及同时捕获甲基化和变异的能力,使其成为推进转化研究和精准肿瘤学的有力工具。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Comprehensive tumor characterization increasingly requires both genomic and epigenomic information, yet current methylation profiling methods, such as bisulfite-based workflows, limit sensitivity and accuracy due to DNA degradation and reduced sequence complexity. To address these constraints, we developed an improved positive-conversion chemistry that directly converts methylated cytosines while preserving unmethylated ones to enable simultaneous detection of cytosine modifications and genetic variants from a single NGS library. This approach is designed to support oncology research applications where high accuracy from limited or damaged material, such as FFPE tissue and cell-free circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA), is essential. To assess performance, FFPE, fresh-frozen, and cfDNA samples were processed using an optimized oxidation-reduction workflow. Libraries were sequenced on standard short-read platforms, and methylation accuracy, F1 scores, CNV concordance, and tumor-normal methylation contrast were evaluated. Performance was compared to whole-genome sequencing (WGS) controls and conventional bisulfite and enzymatic methylation sequencing methods.The chemistry demonstrated efficient reduction of modified cytosines, enabling high-confidence methylation calling with low false positive rates. Sequence complexity was maintained, allowing robust SNV and CNV detection from the same library. FFPE samples exhibited improved CpG coverage, fewer sequence artifacts, and improved library complexity compared to enzymatic methylation sequencing. cfDNA libraries generated from as little as 1 ng yielded reliable global methylation profiles suitable for tissue-of-origin analyses. The nondestructive nature of the chemistry preserved cfDNA fragments, opening the door to fragmentomics analyses. In tumor-normal comparisons, there was clear resolution of differentially methylated regions (DMRs), supporting more precise identification of tumor-specific epigenetic alterations. This enhanced positive-conversion chemistry enables unified genomic and epigenomic analysis from a single assay, making it highly suited for oncology research applications such as tumor classification, biomarker discovery, minimal residual disease (MRD) assessment, and liquid biopsy. Its gentle conditions, compatibility with degraded FFPE DNA and low-input cfDNA, and ability to capture both methylation and variants position it as a powerful tool for advancing translational research and precision oncology.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Boeck, None.. J. Pavlica, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索