PO.MCB06.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

在泛癌种临床队列中使用酶法甲基化测序对循环肿瘤DNA进行基于甲基化的分类

Methylation-based classification of circulating tumor DNA using enzymatic methyl-seq in a pan-cancer clinical cohort

海报缩略图:在泛癌种临床队列中使用酶法甲基化测序对循环肿瘤DNA进行基于甲基化的分类
编号 1967 展板 19 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 22 主讲 Kimberly Holden, BS;MS
分会场 DNA Methylation
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Kimberly A. Holden1, Ashraf Shabaneh1, Dennis D. Krutkin1, Adib Shafi1, Tong Liu1, Kerry D. Fitzgerald1, Eyad Almasri1, Yuanyu Cao1, Xiaojun Guan1, Graham McLennan1, Nathan Faulkner1, Shakti Ramkissoon2, Marcia Eisenberg2, Brian Caveney2, Eric Severson2, Taylor J. Jensen2, Jonathan Williams1

1Labcorp, San Diego, CA,2Labcorp, Durham, NC

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
循环肿瘤DNA(ctDNA)为癌症的检测和监测提供了一种微创方法。将基于DNA甲基化的生物标志物纳入液体活检工作流程有望提高分析性能。我们在泛癌种临床队列中评估了NEBNext® 酶法甲基化测序(EM-seq)试剂盒用于基于ctDNA的癌症分类的性能。该队列由99份血浆来源的cfDNA样本组成(29名健康供体;70名涵盖五个器官部位的癌症患者),采用半自动化EM-seq工作流程处理,并测序至10X的目标深度。使用DNA甲基化比值进行多种机器建模方法评估,比值被分割为从10 bp到350 bp、以10 bp递增的不同分箱大小。对于每个窗口大小,采用留一法交叉验证策略以区分癌症样本和健康样本。这项分辨率研究共测试了超过31,000个模型,并使用灵敏度、特异度和曲线下面积(AUC)评估模型的预测能力。对于每个模型,通过评估模型区分健康供体和癌症患者cfDNA的能力来评价其性能。分箱大小为290 bp的逻辑回归表现最佳,AUC为0.98,灵敏度为0.96,特异度为0.9。与模型无关的特征选择识别出15个在各交叉验证集之间高度重叠的特征。部分分箱定位到已知的癌基因,如NOTCH2和CASC15,或已知参与细胞生长和肿瘤进展的区域,包括TGFA(一种原癌基因)、调控性RNA LINC00665,以及与癌症生物学相关的基因,如HS3ST5、SPOCK3、ATG13和ERGIC1。其他分箱则位于基因间区或位于尚无已知致癌作用的基因内(EPS15L1、ARMC9)。被错误分类的样本(n = 6;3例健康、3例癌症)的平均比对效率(均值 = 87.5%)低于正确分类的样本(均值 = 94.5%;p = 0.003),提示测序质量可能影响分类结果。不同的建模方法与分辨率水平(分箱大小)组合对疾病状态也具有高度预测性。使用EM-seq对ctDNA进行基于甲基化的分类可实现跨多种肿瘤类型的高灵敏度癌症检测。转化效率、跨工作流程一致性的持续改进以及样本队列的扩大可能进一步增强模型的稳健性。这些发现支持了基于甲基化信息的液体活检作为肿瘤学诊断工具的潜力。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) offers a minimally invasive approach for cancer detection and monitoring. The addition of DNA methylation-based biomarkers into liquid biopsy workflows has the potential to enhance analytical performance. We evaluated the performance of the NEBNext ®  Enzymatic Methyl-seq (EM-seq) kit for ctDNA-based cancer classification in a pan-cancer clinical cohort. A cohort consisting of 99 plasma-derived cfDNA samples (29 healthy donors; 70 cancer patients across five organ sites) were processed using a semi-automated EM-seq workflow and sequenced to a target depth of 10X. Multiple machine modeling methods were evaluated using DNA methylation ratio values segmented into bin sizes ranging from 10 bp to 350 bp, increasing in 10 bp increments. For each window size, a leave-one-out cross-validation strategy was applied to differentiate cancer from healthy samples. This resolution study resulted in the testing of over 31,000 models, and the predictive capacity of models was evaluated using sensitivity, specificity, and area under the curve (AUC). For each model, performance was evaluated by assessing the ability of the model to differentiate cfDNA from healthy donors and cancer patients. Logistic regression with a bin size of 290bp achieved the highest performance with an AUC of 0.98, sensitivity of 0.96, and specificity of 0.9. Model agnostic feature selection identified 15 features that highly overlap amongst cross-validation sets. Some bins mapped to known oncogenes such as NOTCH2 and CASC15 , or regions known to contribute to cell growth and tumor progression, including TGFA (a proto-oncogene), regulatory RNA LINC00665, and genes implicated in cancer biology such as HS3ST5 , SPOCK3 , ATG13 , and ERGIC1 . Other bins fell in intergenic regions or within genes with no known roles in oncogenesis ( EPS15L1 , ARMC9 ). The misclassified samples (n = 6; 3 healthy and 3 cancer) had a lower average mapping efficiency (mean = 87.5%) than correctly classified samples (mean = 94.5%; p = 0.003), suggesting that sequencing quality may influence classification outcomes. Different combinations of modeling methods and resolution levels (bin size) were also highly predictive of disease status. Methylation-based classification of ctDNA using EM-seq enables high-sensitivity cancer detection across multiple tumor types. Ongoing improvements in conversion efficiency, consistency across workflows, and expansion of sample cohorts may further enhance model robustness. These findings support the potential of methylation-informed liquid biopsy as a diagnostic tool in oncology.
利益披露 Disclosure
K. A. Holden, Labcorp Employment, Stock. A. Shabaneh, Labcorp Employment, Stock. D. D. Krutkin, Labcorp Employment, Stock. A. Shafi, Labcorp Employment, Stock. T. Liu, Labcorp Employment, Stock. K. D. Fitzgerald, Labcorp Employment, Stock. E. Almasri, Labcorp Employment, Stock. Y. Cao, Labcorp Employment, Stock. X. Guan, Labcorp Employment, Stock. G. McLennan, Labcorp Employment, Stock. N. Faulkner, Labcorp Employment, Stock. S. Ramkissoon, Labcorp Employment, Stock. M. Eisenberg, Labcorp Employment, Stock. B. Caveney, Labcorp Employment, g., Board of Directors, non-salaried role), Stock, Stock Option. E. Severson, Labcorp Employment, Stock. T. J. Jensen, Labcorp Employment, Stock. J. Williams, Labcorp Employment, Stock.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索