PO.MCB06.02 · 分子与细胞生物学
5-氮杂胞苷的表观遗传调控降低多西他赛耐药前列腺癌3D球体模型中的侵袭性表型
Epigenetic modulation with 5-Azacytidine reduces aggressive phenotypes in 3D spheroid models of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:前列腺癌(PCa)在美国仍是一项重大的健康负担,是男性中第二常诊断的恶性肿瘤。虽然局限性肿瘤的5年生存率为98%,但转移性前列腺癌则明显不同,5年生存率仅为32%。治疗效果的这种差异在很大程度上归因于对多西他赛的低应答率和快速耐药。越来越多的证据表明,表观遗传机制,尤其是DNMT1介导的高甲基化,通过抑制抑癌基因的表达在这种耐药的发生和维持中发挥关键作用,导致侵袭、迁移和化疗耐药增加。既往研究表明,5-氮杂胞苷(5-AZA)可降低前列腺癌模型中上皮-间质转化(EMT)相关标志物和侵袭性表型。然而,其在能够更好模拟体内肿瘤微环境的3D球体系统中的作用仍不明确。
方法:为评估5-AZA对由PC3和PC3-DR细胞生成的3D球体中表观遗传调控、EMT标志物和侵袭性表型的影响,在超低吸附板中形成球体,并用1–2 µM的5-AZA处理。通过Western blot评估DNMT1和耐药相关标志物的蛋白表达。
结果:Matrigel中的PC3-DR球体在24小时时表现出强烈的侵袭,伴有向外的细胞延伸并与基质相互作用。5-AZA处理以剂量依赖方式降低了这种侵袭。蛋白分析显示核提取物中DNMT1显著受到抑制,证实了对表观遗传因子的有效靶向,而MDR1在胞浆组分中仍大量存在,与其在化疗耐药中的作用一致。5-AZA诱导GSTP1重新表达,并使EMT程序转向上皮表型,印证了此前在2D模型中报道的发现。值得注意的是,PC3-DR球体对治疗的应答强于亲代PC3细胞,提示其更依赖于甲基化驱动的通路。
结论:总体而言,5-AZA似乎通过降低DNMT1活性、恢复上皮特性和抑制侵袭,逆转了多西他赛耐药前列腺癌3D球体模型中的侵袭性表型。这些发现支持将表观遗传调控作为克服化疗耐药的潜在治疗策略,并强调了3D系统对建模治疗耐药性疾病的重要性。未来需要整合全基因组甲基化图谱分析和体内验证的研究,以确立5-AZA作为对抗转移性前列腺癌多西他赛耐药的可行策略。由U54 PHSU-MCC资助:U54CA163071 与 U54CA163068;NIH-NIMHD资助 MD007579,以及NIH-NIGMS资助 U54GM133807。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Prostate cancer (PCa) remains a significant health burden in the US, making it the second most frequently diagnosed malignancy in men. While the 5-year survival rate for localized tumors is 98%, metastatic prostate cancer presents a marked difference, with a 5-year survival rate of only 32%. The disparity in treatment effectiveness is largely due to low response rates and rapid resistance to docetaxel. Increasing evidence suggests that epigenetic mechanisms, particularly DNMT1-mediated hypermethylation, play a critical role in developing and maintaining this resistance by suppressing tumor-suppressor gene expression, leading to increased invasion, migration, and chemoresistance.Previous studies have shown that 5-azacytidine (5-AZA) can decrease epithelial-mesenchymal transition (EMT)-related markers and aggressive phenotypes in prostate cancer models. However, its effects in 3D spheroid systems, which better mimic the in vivo tumor microenvironment, remain unclear.
Methods: To evaluate the impact of 5-AZA on epigenetic regulation, EMT markers, and aggressive phenotypes in 3D spheroids generated from PC3 and PC3-DR cells, spheroids were formed in ultra-low attachment plates and treated with 1-2 µM of 5-AZA. Protein expression of DNMT1 and resistance related markers was evaluated through Western blot.
Results: PC3-DR spheroids in Matrigel showed strong invasion at 24 hours with outward cellular extensions and interaction with the matrix. Treatment with 5-AZA reduced this invasion in a dose-dependent manner. Protein analysis revealed significant suppression of DNMT1 in nuclear extracts, confirming effective targeting of epigenetic factors, whereas MDR1 remained abundant in cytosolic fractions, consistent with its role in chemoresistance. 5-AZA induced the re-expression of GSTP1 and shifted EMT programs toward an epithelial phenotype, corroborating previously reported findings in 2D models. Notably, PC3-DR spheroids demonstrated a stronger response to treatment than the parental PC3 cells, suggesting a greater reliance on methylation-driven pathways.
Conclusions: Overall, 5-AZA appears to reverse aggressive phenotypes in 3D spheroid models of docetaxel-resistant prostate cancer by reducing DNMT1 activity, restoring epithelial identity, and suppressing invasion. These findings support the use of epigenetic modulation as a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome chemoresistance and emphasize the importance of 3D systems for modeling treatment-resistant diseases. Future studies integrating genome-wide methylation profiling and in vivo validation are needed to establish 5-AZA as a viable strategy to counteract docetaxel resistance in metastatic prostate cancer. Sponsored by U54 PHSU-MCC Grants: U54CA163071 & U54CA163068; NIH-NIMHD Grant MD007579, and NIH-NIGMS Grant U54GM133807.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. P. Torres Rosado, None..
G. Castro Morales, None..
L. J. Godoy, None..
G. Ruiz Deya, None.