PO.MCB08.02 · 分子与细胞生物学
泛癌无PCR全基因组测序在单独外显子组测序之外精细刻画体细胞驱动图谱
Pan-cancer PCR-free whole-genome sequencing refines the somatic driver landscape beyond exome sequencing alone
作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations
摘要 Abstract
中文摘要
背景:最初的TCGA外显子组测序项目建立了体细胞突变的基础目录。然而,捕获偏倚以及在GC富集和重复区域中有限的覆盖度,可能掩盖了真正的驱动事件,并在蛋白质编码基因图谱中引入了系统性的“盲点”。利用高深度、无PCR的全基因组测序(WGS),我们重新审视了多种肿瘤类型中的体细胞突变图谱,通过提高GC富集区域的灵敏度并减少假象驱动的假阳性来增强驱动因素的发现。
方法:我们分析了来自>8,000例TCGA病例、涵盖多种癌症类型的匹配肿瘤-正常无PCR WGS数据,这些病例已有先前发表的基于全外显子组测序(WES)数据的体细胞突变检出结果,应用统一的最佳实践流程进行SNV/indel检测和严格的检出后过滤。我们聚焦于(i)WGS与外显子组在编码区之间的一致性,(ii)不一致位点的覆盖度、等位基因分数和局部序列背景(GC含量、片段重复),以及(iii)已确立癌症基因中变异的复发性和位置聚集性。
结果:无PCR的WGS鉴定出比WES多得多的高置信度编码突变,在GC富集外显子和难以捕获的位点上获益最大。这种灵敏度的提高在经典驱动基因中揭示了额外的致病或可能致病变异,包括乳腺癌中的TP53和FOXA1、胶质母细胞瘤中的EGFR,以及葡萄膜黑色素瘤(UVM)中的BAP1,从而强化了已知的基因型-表型关联。在UVM中,我们观察到BAP1 5′UTR/启动子区域的一个插入缺失,该变异被WES系统性遗漏,但在WGS数据中得到稳健读取证据的支持,提示了一个扩展的BAP1破坏性事件谱,具有潜在的调控和临床意义。相反,我们发现一部分仅由WES检出的变异定位于片段重复或低支持位点,与技术假象一致。因此,对不一致检出结果的整合再注释既消除了虚假事件,又揭示了未被充分认识的驱动突变和机制。
结论:我们的系统性比较表明,无PCR的WGS能够在基于外显子组的目录之外精细刻画体细胞突变和驱动图谱,尤其是在GC富集和调控区域。这些结果倡导用当代WGS重新审查先前已分析的肿瘤类型,以获得癌症驱动改变更完整、更准确的图谱。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: The initial TCGA exome sequencing project established a foundational catalog of somatic mutations. However, capture biases and limited coverage in GC-rich and repetitive regions may have obscured bona fide driver events and introduced systematic “blind spots” in the landscape of protein-coding genes. Leveraging high-depth, PCR-free whole-genome sequencing (WGS), we revisited the somatic mutation landscape in multiple tumor types to enhance driver discovery by improving sensitivity in GC-rich regions and reducing artifact-driven false positives.
Methods: We analyzed matched tumor-normal PCR-free WGS data from >8,000 TCGA cases across several cancer types with existing previously published somatic mutation calls from whole exome sequencing (WES) data, applying a unified best-practice pipeline for SNV/indel detection and stringent post-calling filters. We focused on (i) concordance between WGS and exome across coding regions, (ii) coverage, allele fraction, and local sequence context (GC content, segmental duplications) of discordant sites, and (iii) recurrence and positional clustering of variants in established cancer genes.
Results: PCR-free WGS identified substantially more high-confidence coding mutations than WES, with the greatest gains in GC-rich exons and difficult-to-capture loci. This increased sensitivity uncovered additional pathogenic or likely pathogenic variants in canonical drivers, including TP53 and FOXA1 in breast cancer, EGFR in glioblastoma, and BAP1 in uveal melanoma (UVM), thereby strengthening known genotype-phenotype associations. In UVM, we observed an indel in the BAP1 5′UTR/promoter region that was systematically missed by WES but supported by robust read evidence in WGS data, nominating an expanded spectrum of BAP1-disrupting events with potential regulatory and clinical relevance. Conversely, we found a subset of WES-only calls localized to segmental duplications or low-support sites, consistent with technical artifacts. Integrated re-annotation of discordant calls thus both eliminates spurious events and reveals underappreciated driver mutations and mechanisms.
Conclusions: Our systematic comparison demonstrates that PCR-free WGS can refine the somatic mutation and driver landscape beyond exome-based catalogs, particularly in GC-rich and regulatory regions. These results advocate for re-interrogation of previously profiled tumor types with contemporary WGS to achieve a more complete and accurate map of cancer-driving alterations.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. Wang, None..
D. Heiman, None..
V. Narasimha Swamy, None..
C. Stewart, None..
X. Loinaz, None..
R. Solan, None..
C. Bao, None..
D. Lehotzky, None..
B. Danysh, None..
L. Corchete Sanchez, None..
Z. Everton, None..
S. Wiseman, None..
A. Kowalewski, None..
S. Van Seters, None..
S. Belkin, None..
H. Tomono, None..
A. Cherniack, None..
R. Kim, None..
G. Lee, None..
W. Lee, None..
H. Park, None..
R. Jang, None..
Y. Ju, None..
G. Getz, None..
E. Rheinbay, None.