PO.MCB08.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

IPMN来源胰腺癌的临床基因组学图谱

Clinicogenomic landscape of IPMN-derived pancreatic cancer

海报缩略图:IPMN来源胰腺癌的临床基因组学图谱
编号 1995 展板 21 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 23 主讲 Peter Yu, MD
分会场 Genomic Drivers of Cancer Pathogenesis
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Peter Y. Yu, Joseph R. Habib, Jonah Levine, Brock Hewitt, Michael D. Kluger, Katherine A. Morgan, Anirban Maitra, Christopher Wolfgang, Ammar A. Javed, Greg Sacks

NYU Langone Health, New York, NY

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
进一步理解导管内乳头状黏液性肿瘤(IPMN)来源胰腺癌的基因组改变及其与生存结局的关联,对于识别个体化治疗和改善结局是必要的。我们回顾了2012年至2025年间切除的IPMN相关胰腺癌病例,并识别出病理证实浸润成分起源于IPMN(而非并存的PDAC)的胰腺导管腺癌(PDAC)病例。共识别出38例具有相应全面基因组分析结果的患者,并收集了临床特征和结局数据。30例患者(79%)为KRAS突变型(mt),8例患者(21%)为KRAS野生型(WT)肿瘤。12例肿瘤(32%)为mtGNAS,26例肿瘤(68%)为GNAS WT。进一步在mtGNAS背景下考察mtKRAS,23例患者的肿瘤(61%)仅有mtKRAS,7例(18%)为KRAS和GNAS共突变,5例(13%)仅有mtGNAS,3例患者(8%)两种突变均无。KRAS野生型(WT)肿瘤与相比mtKRAS肿瘤更好的总生存期(OS)和无病生存期(DFS)相关。mtGNAS肿瘤与相比GNAS WT肿瘤更好的DFS相关。在5例仅mtGNAS的肿瘤中,存在CCND2和MYC基因家族共扩增的富集(5例中有3例)。另外两例仅mtGNAS病例具有BRAF和MAP2K1(MEK)突变。7例(18%)携带ATM突变,识别出2例(5%)RNF43突变。在单变量Cox回归分析中,只有淋巴血管侵犯(LVI)与OS显著相关。LVI和淋巴结阳性与DFS显著相关。尽管患者数量有限,我们已识别出KRAS WT和mtGNAS作为IPMN来源PDAC的潜在预后生物标志物。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Further understanding of the genomic alterations in intraductal papillary mucinous neoplasm (IPMN)- derived pancreatic cancer and associations with survival outcomes is necessary to identify tailored therapy and improve outcomes. We reviewed resected IPMN-associated pancreatic cancer cases from 2012 to 2025 and identified cases of pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDAC) where pathology demonstrated that the invasive component arose from an IPMN (not concomitant PDAC). 38 patients with corresponding comprehensive genomic profiling results were identified and clinical characteristics and outcomes data were collected. 30 patients (79%) had KRAS mutated (mt) and 8 patients (21%) had KRAS wild type (WT) tumors. 12 tumors (32%) were mtGNAS and 26 tumors (68%) were GNAS WT. Further examining mtKRAS in the context of mtGNAS, 23 patients' tumors (61%) had mtKRAS alone, 7 (18%) with KRAS and GNAS co-mutation, 5 (13%) with mtGNAS alone, and 3 patients (8%) had neither mutation. KRAS wild type (WT) tumors associated with better overall survival (OS) and disease-free survival (DFS) compared with mtKRAS tumors. mtGNAS tumors associated with better DFS compared with GNAS WT tumors. In the 5 mtGNAS-only tumors, there was an enrichment of CCND2 and MYC gene family co-amplifications (3 out of 5). The other two mtGNAS-only cases had BRAF and MAP2K1 (MEK) mutations. 7 cases (18%) harbored ATM mutations and 2 cases (5%) of RNF43 mutations were identified. In univariate cox regression analysis, only lymphovascular invasion (LVI) was significantly associated with OS. LVI and node positivity were significantly associated with DFS. Despite limited numbers of patients, we have identified KRAS WT and mtGNAS as potential prognostic biomarkers for IPMN-derived PDAC.
利益披露 Disclosure
P. Y. Yu, None.. J. R. Habib, None.. J. Levine, None. B. Hewitt, Histosonics Other, Educational consultant. M. D. Kluger, None.. K. A. Morgan, None. A. Maitra, Thrive Earlier Detection, an Exact Sciences Company Other Intellectual Property. C. Wolfgang, None.. A. A. Javed, None.. G. Sacks, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索