PO.MCB08.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

Minerva:利用长读长测序实现高分辨率等位基因特异性拷贝数与复杂结构变异的协调整合

Minerva: High-Resolution Allele-Specific Copy Number and Complex SV Harmonization with Long Reads

海报缩略图:Minerva:利用长读长测序实现高分辨率等位基因特异性拷贝数与复杂结构变异的协调整合
编号 1998 展板 24 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 23 主讲 Ayse Keskus, BS;PhD
分会场 Genomic Drivers of Cancer Pathogenesis
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Ayse G. Keskus, Tanveer Ahmad, Isabel Rodriguez, Anton Goretsky, Ataberk Donmez, Sonam Tulsyan, Nicholas Syracuse, Michael Dean, Mikhail Kolmogorov

NIH-NCI, Bethesda, MD

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
拷贝数改变(CNA)和结构变异(SV)是癌症演化的主要驱动因素,然而在高度重排的肿瘤基因组中准确解析等位基因特异性拷贝数(ASCN)仍具挑战性。传统方法在有限的定相信息和不准确的分段处理方面往往力不从心。长读长测序在基因组重建方面具有独特优势,但目前的拷贝数工具尚未充分利用其长程定相或断点级别的分辨率。我们提出Minerva,一个用于ASCN检测和复杂SV聚类的长读长框架。Minerva将来自Severus的高保真结构变异检测结果整合到一个断点图中,该图直接在重排断点上定义分段。这种方法实现了染色体臂尺度的定相,使单倍型能够贯穿长距离且结构复杂的区域进行追踪。它进一步提供了单倍型特异性的覆盖度估计,即使跨越SV聚类也能实现准确的拷贝数分配。Minerva同时支持肿瘤-正常和仅肿瘤的工作流程,即使在缺乏配对正常样本的情况下,也能提供稳定的倍性估计和单倍型感知的拷贝数推断。 我们使用CASTLE长读长体细胞癌症细胞系面板,将Minerva与已确立的短读长和长读长拷贝数方法进行了基准比较。在几乎所有细胞系中,Minerva均实现了更高的染色体尺度拷贝数准确性、更一致的纯度/倍性估计,以及对局灶性拷贝数变化(包括缺失、重复,或更复杂的事件如伴缺失的易位)的显著改进检测。凭借长读长SV断点的精确性,Minerva能够解析小于100 bp的拷贝数分段,其分辨率比短读长方法精细数个数量级。在重排密集的基因组中性能提升最为显著,包括回折倒位、系统性扩增、模板化插入以及ecDNA。 我们进一步将Minerva应用于(i)一个乳腺癌长读长细胞系面板和(ii)一个长读长乳腺肿瘤队列。在两个数据集中,Minerva均识别出关键致癌区域(包括MYC、ERBB2和CCND1)中独特且反复出现的扩增模式,并揭示了现有拷贝数/SV方法所遗漏的等位基因特异性局灶事件和复杂重排结构。Minerva为仅肿瘤长读长癌症基因组学中的高分辨率拷贝数和SV解读提供了一个统一的、定相感知的解决方案,能够更准确地重建癌症基因组结构、选择压力以及致癌扩增景观。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Copy-number alterations (CNAs) and structural variations (SVs) are major drivers of cancer evolution, yet accurately resolving allele-specific copy number (ASCN) in highly rearranged tumor genomes remains challenging. Conventional approaches often struggle with limited phasing information and inaccurate segmentation. Long-read sequencing offers unique advantages for genome reconstruction, but current CN tools do not fully exploit its long-range phasing or breakpoint-level resolution.We present Minerva, a long-read framework for ASCN calling and complex SV clustering. Minerva integrates high-fidelity structural variation calls from Severus into a breakpoint graph that defines segmentation directly on rearrangement breakpoints. This approach enables chromosome-arm-scale phasing, allowing haplotypes to be followed through long and structurally complex regions. It further provides haplotype-specific coverage estimates and accurate CN assignment even across SV clusters. Minerva supports both tumor-normal and tumor-only workflows, delivering stable ploidy estimation and haplotype-aware CN inference even in the absence of matched normals. Using the CASTLE long-read somatic cancer cell line panel, we benchmarked Minerva against established short-read and long-read CN methods. Across nearly all cell lines, Minerva achieved higher chromosome-scale CN accuracy, more consistent purity/ploidy estimates, and markedly improved detection of focal CN changes, including deletions, duplications, or more complex events like translocations with deletions. Leveraging the precision of long-read SV breakpoints, Minerva resolves sub-100 bp CN segments, representing orders-of-magnitude finer resolution than short-read approaches. Performance gains were strongest in genomes with dense rearrangements, including fold-back inversions, sysmic amplifications, templated insertions, and ecDNA. We further applied Minerva to (i) a breast cancer long-read cell-line panel and (ii) a long-read breast tumor cohort. Across both datasets, Minerva identified distinct and recurrent amplification patterns in key oncogenic regions, including MYC, ERBB2, and CCND1, and revealed allele-specific focal events and complex rearrangement architectures missed by existing CN/SV methods. Minerva provides a unified, phasing-aware solution for high-resolution CN and SV interpretation in tumor-only long-read cancer genomics, enabling more accurate reconstruction of cancer genome structure, selective pressures, and oncogenic amplification landscapes.
利益披露 Disclosure
A. Keskus, None.. T. Ahmad, None.. I. Rodriguez, None.. A. Goretsky, None.. A. Donmez, None.. S. Tulsyan, None.. N. Syracuse, None.. M. Dean, None.. M. Kolmogorov, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索