PO.MCB08.02 · 分子与细胞生物学

一例原发性卵巢透明细胞癌中自发性CTNNB1驱动突变的回复

A spontaneous CTNNB1 driver mutation reversion in a primary ovarian clear cell carcinoma

海报缩略图:一例原发性卵巢透明细胞癌中自发性CTNNB1驱动突变的回复
编号 2000 展板 26 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 23 主讲 Rania Bassiouni, PhD
分会场 Genomic Drivers of Cancer Pathogenesis
查看 PDF 下载 PDF 🔒 查看 / 下载完整 PDF 需登录并开通下载套餐 · 查看套餐 / 开通 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Rania Bassiouni1, Yuxin Jin1, Lee D. Gibbs2, Jing Qian2, Solomon O. Rotimi2, Heather Miller2, Michelle G. Webb2, David W. Craig1, Javier Arias-Stella1, Lynda Roman2, John D. Carpten1

1City of Hope, Duarte, CA,2University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
卵巢透明细胞癌(OCCC)是上皮性卵巢癌中一种在组织学和临床上均独特的亚型,通常表现出基因组不稳定性和反复出现的拷贝数(CN)改变。 在此,我们描述一例来自46岁患者的OCCC病例。原发肿瘤分期为IIIC期,在给予辅助治疗前经手术切除。我们对原发肿瘤的新鲜冷冻标本进行了细胞核分离和单细胞全基因组测序。对于单细胞CN分析,测序数据使用Cell Ranger DNA流程(10x Genomics)进行处理。经过严格的质量过滤后,细胞按CN进行聚类以解析克隆混合体。 除二倍体细胞(cluster 1)外,样本还包含两个具有不同CN特征的克隆(cluster 2和cluster 3),每个克隆又由额外的亚克隆组成。这两个克隆共享一些相同的CN改变,提示存在共同祖先。为确定克隆出现的顺序,我们进行了基于CN的系统发育分析,将cluster 3判定为较早出现的克隆。这一结论得到了单细胞杂合性缺失(LOH)判定的支持,后者显示cluster 2中的LOH等于并超过cluster 3的LOH。 以样本中的二倍体成分作为配对种系,我们进行了体细胞变异检测以鉴定有意义的突变。这两个克隆共享数百个体细胞乘客突变,支持其共享谱系。然而,仅鉴定出一个候选驱动突变,即一个杂合性CTNNB1 S37C激活突变。有趣的是,只有cluster 3——即早期克隆——携带该突变。对B等位基因频率的检查揭示cluster 2中3号染色体上(涵盖CTNNB1)发生了LOH。单倍型判定证实cluster 2中B等位基因丢失并且野生型A等位基因发生重复。因此,证据提示CTNNB1驱动突变是通过一次保留了野生型等位基因的拷贝数中性LOH事件而丢失的。 为确定这种回复是否反映在基因表达程序中,我们对原发肿瘤的福尔马林固定石蜡包埋标本进行了空间转录组学分析(10x Genomics)。我们通过位置性基因集富集识别出肿瘤中对应两个克隆的区域。这些克隆占据了空间上离散的位置,并在组织学和转录学上截然不同。基因集富集分析证实对应cluster 3的区域富集于反映WNT/beta-catenin信号和上皮-间质转化的程序,这与激活性CTNNB1突变相一致。相反,cluster 2富集于TNFA信号、缺氧和KRAS信号的程序。 这是首个在未经治疗的原发肿瘤中发现致癌驱动突变回复的证据,反映了染色体不稳定性对肿瘤内异质性的一个令人意外的后果。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Ovarian clear cell carcinoma (OCCC) is a histologically and clinically distinct subtype of epithelial ovarian cancer that typically demonstrates genomic instability and recurrent copy number (CN) alterations. Here, we describe an OCCC case from a 46-year-old patient. The primary tumor, staged IIIC, was surgically removed prior to administration of adjuvant treatment. We subjected a fresh-frozen specimen of the primary tumor to nuclear isolation and single cell whole genome sequencing. For single cell CN analysis, sequencing data was processed with the Cell Ranger DNA pipelines (10x Genomics). Following stringent quality filtering, cells were clustered by CN to resolve clonal mixtures. In addition to diploid cells (cluster 1), the sample contained two clones with distinct CN profiles (clusters 2 and 3), each comprised of additional subclones. The two clones shared some identical CN alterations, suggesting a common ancestor. To determine the order of clone emergence, we performed CN-based phylogenetic analysis, which identified cluster 3 as the earlier clone. This was supported by single cell loss of heterozygosity (LOH) determination, which revealed that LOH in cluster 2 equaled and exceeded that of cluster 3. Using the diploid component of the sample as a matched germline, we performed somatic variant calling to identify consequential mutations. The two clones shared several hundred somatic passenger mutations, supporting a shared lineage. However, only one candidate driver mutation was identified, a heterozygous CTNNB1 S37C activating mutation. Interestingly, only cluster 3 - the early clone - harbored the mutation. Examination of B-allele frequencies revealed LOH on chromosome 3, encompassing CTNNB1 , in cluster 2. Haplotype determination confirmed the loss of the B-allele and a duplication of the wild-type A-allele in cluster 2. Thus, the evidence suggests that the CTNNB1 driver mutation was lost via a copy-neutral LOH event that retained the wild-type allele. To determine whether this reversion was reflected in gene expression programs, we performed spatial transcriptomics (10x Genomics) on a formalin-fixed, paraffin embedded specimen of the primary tumor. We identified regions of the tumor corresponding to both clones by positional gene set enrichment. The clones occupied spatially discrete locations and were histologically and transcriptionally distinct. Gene set enrichment analysis confirmed that regions corresponding to cluster 3 were enriched in programs reflecting WNT/beta-catenin signaling and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, consistent with an activating CTNNB1 mutation. Conversely, cluster 2 was enriched in programs for TNFA signaling, hypoxia, and KRAS signaling. This is the first evidence of an oncogenic driver mutation reversion in an untreated primary tumor and reflects a surprising consequence of chromosomal instability on intra-tumoral heterogeneity.
利益披露 Disclosure
R. Bassiouni, None.. Y. Jin, None.. L. D. Gibbs, None.. J. Qian, None.. S. O. Rotimi, None.. H. Miller, None.. M. G. Webb, None.. D. W. Craig, None.. J. Arias-Stella, None.. L. Roman, None.. J. D. Carpten, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索