PO.TB03.04 · 肿瘤生物学

绘制免疫-血管特征图谱以表征三阴性乳腺癌脑转移中的血脑屏障破坏与肿瘤定植

Mapping immuno-vascular signatures to characterize blood brain barrier disruption and tumor colonization in triple negative breast cancer brain metastasis.

编号 2111 展板 9 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 27 主讲 Shruti Rodrigues, MS
分会场 Characterization of Metastases by Imaging and Profiling
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Shruti Rodrigues1, Maria Jose Godoy Calderon2, Manali Patwardhan2, VK Gadi3

1College of Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL,2Medicine, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL,3Hematology/Oncology, University of Illinois at Chicago, Chicago, IL

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
引言:乳腺癌患者脑转移的发生率正在上升,脑转移影响25-40%的三阴性乳腺癌(TNBC)女性患者,中位生存期不足六个月。血脑屏障(BBB)的破坏导致血肿瘤屏障(BTB)的形成,这是脑内定植的关键事件。我们假设转移性肿瘤细胞通过特定的分子机制破坏神经血管完整性,从而促成BTB的形成。阐明TNBC脑趋向性背后的分子机制及关键参与因素——聚焦于BBB破坏与免疫逃逸——将有助于识别并操控该转移过程中的关键参与因素,为预防或逆转定植提供潜在可能。 方法:我们进行了bulk RNA测序,以比较脑趋向性的4T1-Br5细胞与亲本4T1细胞,并表征支持脑适应的转录程序。我们还建立了一个双阶段体内注射模型(原位乳腺脂肪垫注射(MFP),7天后进行心内注射(IC)),以获得用于空间分析的脑转移(BrM)组织。 结果:在体内研究中,10只小鼠接受了4T1-Br5细胞的混合注射;然而仅有5只小鼠存活至终点。5只小鼠中有1只(20%)检测到经组织学确认的、强健的脑转移灶。该比率与文献报道一致,同时也凸显了在免疫健全环境中建模的挑战。RNA-seq显示细胞周期驱动因子(MYC、E2F)和DNA修复通路上调,提示快速增殖和基因组韧性。BRCA1/TP53的改变在不稳定性与生存之间取得平衡,这在侵袭性转移中常见。用于脑定植的适应性通路,包括神经元信号(通过NGFR-BDNF)、细胞骨架重塑和ESR1激活,均表现出明显上调。免疫逃逸特征表现为IL-1beta、IFN-gamma表达降低,抗原呈递(MHC I/II)受损,以及CCL5和补体级联的激活。正如脑血管重塑所预期,血管生成/血管标志物如VEGF、HCN和BGN上调,而THBS2和NOTCH信号下调。 结论:总体而言,脑趋向性的4T1-Br5细胞表现出增殖、免疫逃逸、血管生成、表观遗传可塑性和神经元拟态通路的协调重编程,共同赋予这些细胞克服脑部独特屏障的能力,从而支持其转移性生长。这为识别可干预的治疗靶点奠定了坚实的科学基础。体内模型的剂量优化将产生更一致的脑转移,从而实现小鼠组织与患者来源组织样本的比较性空间分析。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Introduction: The incidence of brain metastases in breast cancer patients is rising, with brain metastases affecting 25-40% of women with triple-negative breast cancer (TNBC), with a median survival of under six months. Disruption of the blood-brain barrier (BBB) leads to the formation of a blood-tumor barrier (BTB), which is a critical event in brain colonization. We hypothesize that metastatic tumor cells disrupt neurovascular integrity via specific molecular mechanisms, thereby enabling BTB formation. Elucidating the molecular mechanisms and key players underlying TNBC brain tropism-focusing on BBB disruption and immune evasion- will help identify and manipulate key players in this metastatic process, offering potential for preventing or reversing colonization. Methods: We performed bulk RNA sequencing to compare brain-tropic 4T1-Br5 cells with parental 4T1 cells and characterized the transcriptional programs supporting brain adaptation. We also established a dual-phased in vivo injection model (orthotopic mammary fat pad injection (MFP) followed by intracardiac injection (IC) 7 days later) to obtain BrM tissue for spatial analysis. Results: For the in vivo study, 10 mice got hybrid injections of 4T1-Br5 cells; however, only 5 mice survived to the endpoint. Robust, histologically confirmed brain metastases were detected in 1 of 5 mice (20%). This rate aligns with literature reports and also highlights modeling challenges in immunocompetent settings. RNA-seq showed upregulation of cell cycle drivers (MYC,E2F) and DNA repair pathways, indicating rapid proliferation and genomic resilience. altered BRCA1/TP53 balanced instability with survival often observed with aggressive metastasis. Adaptive pathways for brain colonization, including neuronal signaling (via NGFR-BDNF), cytoskeletal remodeling, and ESR1 activation, exhibited distinct upregulation. Immune-evasive signatures were characterized by the reduced expression of IL-1beta, IFN-gamma, as well as impaired antigen presentation (MHC I/II), and the activation of CCL5 and the complement cascade. As expected with brain vasculature remodeling, angiogenesis/vascular markers, such as VEGF, HCN, and BGN, were upregulated, while THBS2 and NOTCH signaling were downregulated. Conclusion: Overall, the brain-tropic 4T1-Br5 cells exhibit a coordinated reprogramming of proliferation, immune evasion, angiogenesis, epigenetic plasticity, and neuronal mimicry pathways, collectively empowering them cells to overcome the unique barriers of the brain, thus supporting their metastatic growth. This establishes a strong scientific foundation for identifying actionable targets for therapeutics. I n vivo model dose optimization will yield more consistent brain metastases, enabling a comparative spatial analysis of mouse tissue with patient-derived tissue samples.
利益披露 Disclosure
S. Rodrigues, None.. M. Godoy Calderon, None.. M. Patwardhan, None.. V. Gadi, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索