PO.TB03.04 · 肿瘤生物学

原发肿瘤的空间基因表达谱与来自侵袭前沿的侵袭性CTC释放相关,导致OSCC的早期复发

Spatial gene expression profile of primary tumor is associated with the release of aggressive CTCs from the invasive front, leading to early recurrence in OSCC

编号 2119 展板 17 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 27 主讲 Geeta ., MS
分会场 Characterization of Metastases by Imaging and Profiling
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Geeta S. Boora1, Anshika Chauhan1, Suvradeep Mitra2, Arindam Maitra3, Sushmita Ghoshal4, Arnab Pal1

1Biochemistry, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India, Chandigarh, India,2Histopathology, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research, Chandigarh, India,3BRIC-NIBMG, Kalyani, India,4Radiotherapy, Postgraduate Institute of Medical Education & Research (PGIMER), Chandigarh, India

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:口腔鳞状细胞癌(OSCC)表现出高复发率和治疗失败率。为理解驱动这些不良结局的分子机制,我们利用全转录组分析探索了原发肿瘤及其循环肿瘤细胞(CTC)的空间和时间异质性。 方法:对来自早期复发(EarlyR)患者和2年内无复发(NoR)患者(每组N=5)的三个肿瘤区域(T1-侵袭前沿、T2、T3)和无肿瘤切缘(TFM)进行了Bulk RNAseq。在诊断时以及治疗后/复发时对CTC进行了超低细胞量RNAseq。使用fgsea和clusterProfiler,结合Hallmark和Reactome数据库,进行差异基因表达分析和通路富集,以鉴定生物学相关的基因/通路。 结果:与NoR组相比,EarlyR患者的空间上相距较远的肿瘤区域与其相邻的无肿瘤切缘高度分化,表现为显著更多的差异表达基因(DEG)——T1 vs TFM(EarlyR-2969,NoR-23)、T2 vs TFM(EarlyR-4220 vs NoR-50)以及T3 vs TFM(EarlyR-3883 vs NoR-1239)。我们排除了这些DEG的增加并非由于EarlyR组与NoR组TFM之间的差异所致(DEG-17)。通路分析显示,在EarlyR肿瘤的T1-侵袭前沿富集了转移相关通路,包括EMT、经由NF-κB的TNFA信号传导和ECM重塑,而其他区域(T2/T3)则显示增殖相关通路的富集,表明侵袭前沿T1可能是侵袭性CTC释放的来源。我们鉴定出SERPINE1、BMP2、CXCL10、CXCL11、ICAM1、IFIH1、IFIT2、IL15、IL15RA、IRF1、JUNB、TGFB1和TNC为跨T1富集的多条通路的枢纽基因,它们可能促成该肿瘤区域的侵袭性。在这些基因中,IFIT2、IRF1和JUNB在EarlyR组的基线CTC中也上调,表明追踪这些基因作为侵袭性CTC标志物的重要性。CTC数据的PCA分析显示,尽管基线CTC在EarlyR组和NoR组之间转录组相似,但EarlyR组的治疗后CTC比NoR组更为进化。我们还鉴定出一个关键分子标志物FNBP1L,其在EarlyR的肿瘤侵袭前沿(T1)以及其治疗前和治疗后的CTC中过表达。然而,FNBP1L在原发肿瘤的其他区域(T2/T3)中下调,表明侵袭性CTC主要源自侵袭前沿,而FNBP1L(涉及细胞骨架重组)可能是驱动早期复发和转移的关键因子。 结论:EarlyR患者的OSCC肿瘤经历了广泛的空间和时间转录组进化,侵袭前沿很可能参与了以IFIT2、IRF1、JUNB和FNBP1L表达为标志的侵袭性CTC的释放。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background Oral squamous cell carcinoma (OSCC) exhibits high incidences of relapse and treatment failure. To understand the molecular mechanisms driving these poor outcomes, we explored the spatial and temporal heterogeneity of primary tumors and their circulating tumor cells (CTCs) using whole transcriptome analysis. Methods Bulk RNAseq was performed on three tumor regions (T1-invasive front, T2, T3) and the tumor-free margin (TFM) from early (EarlyR) and no recurrence till 2 years (NoR) patients (N=5 per group). Ultra-low cell RNAseq of CTCs was performed at diagnosis and at post-therapy/recurrence. Differential gene expression analysis and pathway enrichment using fgsea and clusterProfiler, with the Hallmark and Reactome databases, were performed to identify biologically relevant genes/pathways. Results Spatially distant tumor regions of EarlyR patients were highly diversified from their adjacent free margin in comparison to the NoR group, as indicated by a significantly high number of DEGs - T1 vs TFM (EarlyR-2969, NoR-23), T2 vs TFM (EarlyR-4220 vs NoR-50), and T3 vs TFM (EarlyR-3883 vs NoR-1239). We ruled out that these increases in DEGs were not due to differences in TFMs of the EarlyR and NoR groups (DEGs-17). The pathway analysis revealed enrichment of metastasis-related pathways, including EMT, TNFA signalling via NFκB, and ECM remodelling, in the T1-invasive front of the EarlyR tumor, while the other regions(T2/T3) showed enrichment of proliferation-related pathways, indicating that the invasive front -T1 might be the source of release of aggressive CTCs. We identified SERPINE1, BMP2, CXCL10, CXCL11, ICAM1, IFIH1, IFIT2, IL15, IL15RA, IRF1, JUNB, TGFB1, and TNC as hub genes across multiple pathways enriched in T1, which may contribute to the aggressiveness of this tumor region. Among these genes, IFIT2, IRF1, and JUNB were also upregulated in baseline CTCs of the EarlyR group, indicating the importance of tracking these genes as markers of aggressive CTCs. The PCA analysis of CTC data revealed that, although baseline CTCs are transcriptomically similar between the EarlyR and NoR groups, the post-therapy CTCs are more evolved in the EarlyR group than in the NoR group. We also identified a key molecular marker, FNBP1L, overexpressed in the tumor invasive front (T1) of EarlyR and in their CTCs at pretherapy and posttherapy. However, FNBP1L was downregulated in other regions of the primary tumor (T2/T3), suggesting that aggressive CTCs originate primarily from the invasive front, and FNBP1L (implicated in cytoskeletal reorganisation) might be a key player driving early recurrence and metastasis. Conclusion OSCC tumors from EarlyR patients undergo extensive spatial and temporal transcriptomic evolution, and the invasive front is plausibly involved in the release of aggressive CTCs marked by expression of IFIT2, IRF1, JUNB, and FNBP1L.
利益披露 Disclosure
G. S. Boora, None.. A. Chauhan, None.. S. Mitra, None.. A. Maitra, None.. S. Ghoshal, None.. A. Pal, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索