PO.TB07.02 · 肿瘤生物学

SLFN5介导NOTCH1的液-固相变,以抑制非小细胞肺癌的干性和放疗耐药

SLFN5 mediates liquid-to-solid phase transition of NOTCH1 to suppress stemness and radioresistance of non-small cell lung cancer

编号 2192 展板 11 时间 4/20 09:00–12:00 区域 Section 30 主讲 Zhiqiang Wu, BS;D Phil
分会场 Metabolic and Transcriptional Control of Cancer Stem Cell Plasticity
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Mi Tang, Lu Zhang, Jiaxin Zhao, Hongji Dai, Zhiyong Yuan, Zeyun Mi, Zhiqiang Wu

Tianjin Medical Univ. Cancer Inst. & Hospital, Tianjin, China

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:放疗仍是非小细胞肺癌(NSCLC)的主要治疗方式之一,但其疗效常因肿瘤复发、转移和放疗耐药的产生而受损。越来越多的证据表明癌症干细胞(CSC)是放疗耐药的关键驱动因素。因此,阐明其潜在分子机制并开发增强放疗敏感性的治疗靶点至关重要。 方法:为鉴定NSCLC适应性放疗耐药的关键介导因子,我们通过反复照射循环建立了放疗耐药的NSCLC细胞系,随后进行RNA-seq分析,将其与亲本细胞进行比较。通过流式细胞术和集落形成实验评估SLFN5对放疗敏感性的影响,并进一步在裸鼠异种移植肿瘤模型中进行体内验证。通过RT-PCR、Western blot、流式细胞术、成球实验和体内有限稀释成瘤实验评估癌症干细胞样特性。随后,我们采用质谱、免疫共沉淀和邻近连接实验来鉴定SLFN5与NOTCH1之间的相互作用。此外,采用相分离实验、光漂白后荧光恢复、CUT&Tag-seq和ATAC-seq来研究NOTCH1相分离在促进干性和放疗耐药中的作用,以及SLFN5对该过程的调控作用。最后,采用亚硫酸氢盐测序PCR分析SLFN5启动子的甲基化状态。 结果:我们的结果表明,SLFN5在放疗耐药的NSCLC细胞系中显著下调。过表达SLFN5可有效抑制癌症干性和上皮-间质转化,从而在体外和体内增强放疗敏感性。相反,敲低SLFN5产生显著相反的效应。机制上,液-液相分离特性对NOTCH1介导的干性和放疗耐药至关重要。值得注意的是,SLFN5与NOTCH1相互作用并诱导NOTCH1的液-固相变,从而削弱NOTCH1信号传导及随后的干性和放疗耐药。最后,我们鉴定出DNMT3A和DNMT3B为负责SLFN5启动子高甲基化并进而使其沉默的表观遗传调控因子。 结论:我们的研究揭示,DNA甲基化下调的SLFN5通过将NOTCH1从凝胶样相释放为液滴以增强癌细胞干性,从而导致NSCLC的放疗耐药。这项研究为克服NSCLC放疗耐药提供了一种潜在的治疗策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Radiotherapy remains one of the principal therapeutic modalities for non-small cell lung cancer (NSCLC), yet its therapeutic efficacy is frequently compromised by tumor recurrence, metastasis, and the development of radioresistance. Accumulating evidence identifies cancer stem cells (CSCs) as a critical driver of radioresistance. Therefore, elucidating the underlying molecular mechanisms and developing therapeutic targets to enhance radiosensitivity are of critical importance. Methods: To identify key mediators of adaptive radioresistance in NSCLC, we established radioresistant NSCLC cell lines through repeated cycles of irradiation and subsequently performed RNA-seq analysis comparing them with their parental counterparts. The effects of SLFN5 on radiosensitivity were evaluated by flow cytometry and colony formation assays, and further validated in vivo using a nude mouse xenograft tumor model. Cancer stem-like properties were assessed by RT-PCR, Western blot, flow cytometry, sphere formation assay, and in vivo limiting dilution tumorigenesis assays. Subsequently, we employed mass spectrometry, co-immunoprecipitation, and proximity ligation assay to identify the interaction between SLFN5 and NOTCH1. Furthermore, phase separation assay, fluorescence recovery after photobleaching, CUT&Tag-seq, and ATAC-seq were used to investigate the role of NOTCH1 phase separation in promoting stemness and radioresistance, and the regulatory effect of SLFN5 on this process. Finally, the methylation status of the SLFN5 promoter was analyzed using bisulfite sequencing PCR. Results: Our results demonstrate that SLFN5 was significantly downregulated in radioresistant NSCLC cell lines. Overexpressing SLFN5 effectively suppressed cancer stemness and epithelial-mesenchymal transition, thereby enhancing radiosensitivity both in vitro and in vivo. Conversely, knockdown of SLFN5 had significantly opposite effects. Mechanistically, liquid-liquid phase separation property is critical for NOTCH1 mediated stemness and radioresistance. Notably, SLFN5 interacts with NOTCH1 and induces the liquid-to-solid phase transition of NOTCH1, thereby impairing NOTCH1 signaling and the subsequent stemness and radioresistance. Finally, we identified DNMT3A and DNMT3B as the epigenetic regulators responsible for promoter hypermethylation and consequent silencing of SLFN5. Conclusion: Our study reveals that DNA methylation downregulated SLFN5 resulting in radioresistance of NSCLC via liberating NOTCH1 from gel-like phase to liquid droplet to potentiating stemness of cancer cells. This research provides a potential therapeutic strategy to overcome radioresistance in NSCLC.
利益披露 Disclosure
M. Tang, None.. L. Zhang, None.. J. Zhao, None.. H. Dai, None.. Z. Yuan, None.. Z. Mi, None.. Z. Wu, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索