LBPO.ET02 · 实验与分子治疗 · Late-Breaking

诱变驱动的基因组不稳定性将ecDNA扩增与前列腺癌的耐药性和免疫调节联系起来

Mutagenesis-driven genome instability links ecDNA amplification to drug resistance and immune modulation in prostate cancer

编号 LB188 展板 10 时间 4/20 02:00–05:00 区域 Section 53 主讲 Xiaoling Li, PhD
分会场 Late-Breaking Research: Experimental and Molecular Therapeutics 2
该海报暂无可下载的资料 AACR 官方页面

作者与单位 Authors & Affiliations

Xiaoling Li

Yale University, New Haven, CT

摘要 Abstract

中文摘要
背景:去势抵抗性前列腺癌(CRPC)在很大程度上因其能够快速适应治疗压力而仍是一种致死性疾病。基因组不稳定性(包括突变过程和结构性基因组改变)日益被认为是肿瘤异质性、耐药性和免疫逃逸的关键驱动因素。APOBEC家族胞苷脱氨酶是癌症相关诱变的重要来源,但APOBEC驱动的基因组不稳定性如何与CRPC中的染色体外DNA(ecDNA)形成和免疫调节相交织,仍知之甚少。 目的:本研究旨在阐明失调的诱变如何促进CRPC中的基因组不稳定性和ecDNA扩增,并探究这些过程如何共同促成耐药性以及抗肿瘤免疫信号的调节。 方法:我们整合了功能基因组学、全基因组和全外显子组测序、单细胞和空间转录组学以及表观基因组分析,涵盖CRPC细胞系、患者来源类器官和基因工程小鼠模型。针对APOBEC活性和基因组维持调控因子的扰动研究,结合ecDNA检测、染色质分析和免疫信号分析,以评估诱变对治疗反应和肿瘤-免疫相互作用的影响。 结果:我们确定失调的APOBEC活性是治疗耐药性CRPC中突变负荷和瘤内异质性的主要驱动因素。APOBEC活性升高与DNA损伤增加、染色体重排以及ecDNA介导的癌基因扩增的出现相关。单细胞分析揭示,诱变驱动的基因组不稳定性促进了在雄激素受体靶向治疗下具有增强生存能力的多样化肿瘤细胞状态。重要的是,具有高突变和高ecDNA负荷的肿瘤表现出固有免疫信号的改变,包括DNA感应通路的扰动,提示基因组不稳定性与免疫调节之间存在机制性联系。 结论:我们的研究结果确立了诱变作为一种统一力量,将CRPC中的基因组不稳定性、ecDNA扩增、耐药性和免疫调节联系起来。这项工作凸显了癌细胞如何利用突变过程不仅适应治疗,还重塑免疫信号。靶向诱变、ecDNA维持和免疫通路之间的相互作用,代表了克服晚期前列腺癌耐药性的一种有前景的治疗策略。
查看英文原文 English abstract
Background: Castration-resistant prostate cancer (CRPC) remains a lethal disease largely due to its ability to rapidly adapt to therapeutic pressure. Genome instability, including mutational processes and structural genome alterations, is increasingly recognized as a key driver of tumor heterogeneity, drug resistance, and immune evasion. APOBEC family cytidine deaminases are prominent sources of cancer-associated mutagenesis, yet how APOBEC-driven genome instability intersects with extrachromosomal DNA (ecDNA) formation and immune regulation in CRPC remains poorly understood. Objective: This study aims to define how dysregulated mutagenesis promotes genome instability and ecDNA amplification in CRPC and to investigate how these processes collectively contribute to drug resistance and modulation of antitumor immune signaling. Methods: We integrated functional genomics, whole-genome and whole-exome sequencing, single-cell and spatial transcriptomics, and epigenomic profiling across CRPC cell lines, patient-derived organoids, and genetically engineered mouse models. Perturbation studies targeting regulators of APOBEC activity and genome maintenance were combined with ecDNA detection, chromatin profiling, and immune signaling analyses to assess the impact of mutagenesis on therapeutic response and tumor-immune interactions. Results: We identify dysregulated APOBEC activity as a major driver of mutational burden and intratumoral heterogeneity in therapy-resistant CRPC. Elevated APOBEC activity is associated with increased DNA damage, chromosomal rearrangements, and the emergence of ecDNA-mediated oncogene amplification. Single-cell analyses reveal that mutagenesis-driven genome instability promotes divergent tumor cell states with enhanced survival under androgen receptor-targeted therapy. Importantly, tumors with high mutational and ecDNA burden exhibit altered innate immune signaling, including perturbations in DNA sensing pathways, suggesting a mechanistic link between genome instability and immune modulation. Conclusion: Our findings establish mutagenesis as a unifying force that connects genome instability, ecDNA amplification, drug resistance, and immune regulation in CRPC. This work highlights how cancer cells exploit mutational processes not only to adapt to therapy but also to reshape immune signaling. Targeting the interplay between mutagenesis, ecDNA maintenance, and immune pathways represents a promising therapeutic strategy for overcoming resistance in advanced prostate cancer.
利益披露 Disclosure
X. Li, None.

← 返回 AACR 2026 检索